Resilience of electrical power delivery system in response to natural disasters

The electric power transmission and distribution system is a complex and critical part of the national infrastructure. The transmission lines may span hundreds of miles, may include multiple generators and substations, and many key facilities are unguarded. They may be located in vulnerable geographic location and have been attacked by natural disasters. Because of complex nature of todays power system, fault in any link may propagate to cause cascading failure and ultimately blackout. Thus it is necessary to study impact of natural disaster on electrical power systems for understanding the causes of the blackouts, explore ways to prepare and harden the grid, and increase the resilience of the power grid under such events. This study is conducted in order to assess the resilience of Electrical Power Delivery System (EPDS) of IEEE 14 bus system. The resilience is assessed through different techniques like cascading failure analysis for assessing the hazard, risk quantification and ranking for measuring the hazard, and islanding operation and detection for managing the hazard at the post disaster stage. Cascading failure analysis is performed for standard IEEE 14 bus system to determine the optimum value of system tolerance. Similarly, risk quantification criterion is applied to IEEE 14 bus system to determine the line which is most critical to natural disasters taking probability and severity into account. Finally, islanding operation and detection technique is employed to ensure survivability of IEEE 14 bus system even with limited operation.

[1]  Mohamed Shaaban,et al.  Ranking of power system contingencies based on a risk quantification criterion , 2015, 2015 IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD).

[2]  A. Abur,et al.  Identification of network parameter errors , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  S. M. Mahaei,et al.  Power System State Estimation with Weighted Linear Least Square , 2014 .

[4]  A. G. Expósito,et al.  Power system state estimation : theory and implementation , 2004 .

[5]  A. Abur,et al.  Improvements in Network Parameter Error Identification via Synchronized Phasors , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  M. Shaaban Risk-based security assessment in smart power grids , 2011, 2011 IEEE PES Conference on Innovative Smart Grid Technologies - Middle East.

[7]  Ross Baldick,et al.  Research on Resilience of Power Systems Under Natural Disasters—A Review , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  V. Vittal,et al.  Online Risk-Based Security Assessment , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[9]  Ali Abur Phasor-Only State Estimation , 2014 .

[10]  Massimo Marchiori,et al.  Error and attacktolerance of complex network s , 2004 .

[11]  Jianhui Wang,et al.  Resilient Distribution System by Microgrids Formation After Natural Disasters , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[12]  Wenyuan Li,et al.  Risk Assessment Of Power Systems: Models, Methods, and Applications , 2004 .

[13]  Ying Chen,et al.  Resilience-Oriented Critical Load Restoration Using Microgrids in Distribution Systems , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[14]  Ali Abur,et al.  Post disturbance island identification via state estimation , 2012, 2012 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT).

[15]  Haibo He,et al.  Comparative studies of power grid security with network connectivity and power flow information using unsupervised learning , 2016, 2016 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN).

[16]  Haibo He,et al.  Multi-Contingency Cascading Analysis of Smart Grid Based on Self-Organizing Map , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[17]  Zhen Ni,et al.  Cascading failures and transient stability experiment analysis in power grid security , 2016, 2016 IEEE Power & Energy Society Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT).