Impact of repetitive theta burst stimulation on motor cortex excitability

Theta burst stimulation (TBS) alters cortical excitability in inhibitory or facilitatory directions depending on the pattern of stimulation used. Although continuous TBS (cTBS) decreases motor cortex excitability, intermittent TBS (iTBS) increases excitability by introducing an 8-second stimulation interval after 2 seconds of TBS. The after-effects induced by TBS last from 30 minutes up to 1 hour. Optimization of TBS techniques might be possible through manipulation of a variety of parameters such as number of pulses, stimulus intensity, duration of stimulation, and repetitive stimulation. The aim of this study was to assess the after-effects induced by introducing an interval between two TBS interventions to identify more efficient protocols. The study was divided in two groups, iTBS protocols and cTBS protocols, each of them with four sessions: classical TBS, TBS - 2 minutes - TBS, TBS - 5 minutes - TBS, TBS - 20 minutes - TBS. Our results show that cTBS - 20 minutes - cTBS and iTBS - 2 minutes - iTBS resulted in similar after-effects as those accomplished by a single TBS session, whereas a suppression of after-effects was observed in the other break durations. Repeated TBS with short break durations does not seem to be suitable to prolong the duration of excitability changes accomplished by single TBS. These results might be relevant for clinical applications of TBS, when long-lasting excitability alterations are needed.

[1]  Y. Z. Huang,et al.  Theta‐burst repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation suppresses specific excitatory circuits in the human motor cortex , 2005, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  L. Cohen,et al.  Interhemispheric Asymmetry of Corticomotor Excitability After Chronic Cerebellar Infarcts , 2010, The Cerebellum.

[3]  G. Turrigiano.  The Self-Tuning Neuron: Synaptic Scaling of Excitatory Synapses , 2008, Cell.

[4]  E. Wassermann,et al.  Priming Stimulation Enhances the Depressant Effect of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Preconditioning of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence for Homeostatic Plasticity in the Human Motor Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  W. Paulus,et al.  Training Effects Outweigh Effects of Single-Session Conventional rTMS and Theta Burst Stimulation in PD Patients , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[7]  W. Paulus,et al.  Breaks during 5Hz rTMS are essential for facilitatory after effects , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[8]  H. Siebner.  A primer on priming the human motor cortex , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[9]  P. Rossini,et al.  Magnetic stimulation: motor evoked potentials. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[10]  J. Rothwell,et al.  The physiological basis of the effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex , 2008, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Consensus: Motor cortex plasticity protocols , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[12]  G. Deuschl,et al.  Inducing homeostatic-like plasticity in human motor cortex through converging corticocortical inputs. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  W. Senn,et al.  Extending lifetime of plastic changes in the human brain , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[14]  A. Antal,et al.  Simply longer is not better: reversal of theta burst after-effect with prolonged stimulation , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  Ulf Ziemann,et al.  Homeostatic and Nonhomeostatic Modulation of Learning in Human Motor Cortex , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Daniel Zeller,et al.  Depression of human corticospinal excitability induced by magnetic theta-burst stimulation: evidence of rapid polarity-reversing metaplasticity. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  R. Hanajima,et al.  Bidirectional long‐term motor cortical plasticity and metaplasticity induced by quadripulse transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2008, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  Joseph Classen,et al.  L-Type Voltage-Gated Ca2+ Channels: A Single Molecular Switch for Long-Term Potentiation/Long-Term Depression-Like Plasticity and Activity-Dependent Metaplasticity in Humans , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  J E Lisman,et al.  Three Ca2+ levels affect plasticity differently: the LTP zone, the LTD zone and no man's land , 2001, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  Yoshikazu Ugawa,et al.  High-frequency rTMS over the supplementary motor area improves bradykinesia in Parkinson's disease: Subanalysis of double-blind sham-controlled study , 2009, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[21]  John C Rothwell,et al.  Effect of physiological activity on an NMDA-dependent form of cortical plasticity in human. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Preconditioning with transcranial direct current stimulation sensitizes the motor cortex to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation and controls the direction of after-effects , 2004, Biological Psychiatry.

[23]  M. W. Brown,et al.  An experimental test of the role of postsynaptic calcium levels in determining synaptic strength using perirhinal cortex of rat , 2001, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Theta Burst Stimulation of the Human Motor Cortex , 2005, Neuron.

[25]  Tamer H. Emara,et al.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation at 1Hz and 5Hz produces sustained improvement in motor function and disability after ischaemic stroke , 2010, European journal of neurology.

[26]  Mark Hallett,et al.  Mechanisms of Deafferentation-Induced Plasticity in Human Motor Cortex , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  E. Bienenstock,et al.  Theory for the development of neuron selectivity: orientation specificity and binocular interaction in visual cortex , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[28]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  Hartwig R. Siebner,et al.  Modifying motor learning through gating and homeostatic metaplasticity , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[30]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Shaping the optimal repetition interval for cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.