Perceptual “Read-Out” of Conjoined Direction and Disparity Maps in Extrastriate Area MT

Cortical neurons are frequently tuned to several stimulus dimensions, and many cortical areas contain intercalated maps of multiple variables. Relatively little is known about how information is “read out” of these multidimensional maps. For example, how does an organism extract information relevant to the task at hand from neurons that are also tuned to other, irrelevant stimulus dimensions? We addressed this question by employing microstimulation techniques to examine the contribution of disparity-tuned neurons in the middle temporal (MT) visual area to performance on a direction discrimination task. Most MT neurons are tuned to both binocular disparity and the direction of stimulus motion, and MT contains topographic maps of both parameters. We assessed the effect of microstimulation on direction judgments after first characterizing the disparity tuning of each stimulation site. Although the disparity of the stimulus was irrelevant to the required task, we found that microstimulation effects were strongly modulated by the disparity tuning of the stimulated neurons. For two of three monkeys, microstimulation of nondisparity-selective sites produced large biases in direction judgments, whereas stimulation of disparity-selective sites had little or no effect. The binocular disparity was optimized for each stimulation site, and our result could not be explained by variations in direction tuning, response strength, or any other tuning property that we examined. When microstimulation of a disparity-tuned site did affect direction judgments, the effects tended to be stronger at the preferred disparity of a stimulation site than at the nonpreferred disparity, indicating that monkeys can selectively monitor direction columns that are best tuned to an appropriate conjunction of parameters. We conclude that the contribution of neurons to behavior can depend strongly upon tuning to stimulus dimensions that appear to be irrelevant to the current task, and we suggest that these findings are best explained in terms of the strategy used by animals to perform the task.

[1]  S. Zeki Functional organization of a visual area in the posterior bank of the superior temporal sulcus of the rhesus monkey , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey. II. Binocular interactions and sensitivity to binocular disparity. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  R. Desimone,et al.  Columnar organization of directionally selective cells in visual area MT of the macaque. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Visual processing in monkey extrastriate cortex. , 1987, Annual review of neuroscience.

[5]  Hidehiko Komatsu,et al.  A grid system and a microsyringe for single cell recording , 1988, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[6]  William T. Newsome,et al.  Cortical microstimulation influences perceptual judgements of motion direction , 1990, Nature.

[7]  W. Newsome,et al.  Microstimulation in visual area MT: effects on direction discrimination performance , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  J. Movshon,et al.  The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  W. Newsome,et al.  Microstimulation in visual area MT: effects of varying pulse amplitude and frequency , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  T D Albright,et al.  Cortical processing of visual motion. , 1993, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[11]  C D Salzman,et al.  Neural mechanisms for forming a perceptual decision. , 1994, Science.

[12]  A Grinvald,et al.  Optical imaging reveals the functional architecture of neurons processing shape and motion in owl monkey area MT , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  J. Movshon,et al.  A computational analysis of the relationship between neuronal and behavioral responses to visual motion , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[14]  K. H. Britten,et al.  A relationship between behavioral choice and the visual responses of neurons in macaque MT , 1996, Visual Neuroscience.

[15]  V. Mountcastle The columnar organization of the neocortex. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  R. Andersen,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Visual Motion Perception in Primates , 1997, Neuron.

[17]  G. DeAngelis,et al.  Cortical area MT and the perception of stereoscopic depth , 1998, Nature.

[18]  G. DeAngelis,et al.  Organization of Disparity-Selective Neurons in Macaque Area MT , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  T. Pasternak,et al.  Microstimulation of cortical area MT affects performance on a visual working memory task. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  William T Newsome,et al.  Middle Temporal Visual Area Microstimulation Influences Veridical Judgments of Motion Direction , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Gregory C DeAngelis,et al.  Coding of horizontal disparity and velocity by MT neurons in the alert macaque. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  N. Turner PLOS Biology , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.