Spatial and temporal RF electromagnetic field exposure of children and adults in indoor micro environments in Belgium and Greece.

Personal radio frequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure, or exposimetry, is gaining importance in the bioelectromagnetics community but only limited data on personal exposure is available in indoor areas, namely schools, crèches, homes, and offices. Most studies are focused on adult exposure, whereas indoor microenvironments, where children are exposed, are usually not considered. A method to assess spatial and temporal indoor exposure of children and adults is proposed without involving the subjects themselves. Moreover, maximal possible daily exposure is estimated by combining instantaneous spatial and temporal exposure. In Belgium and Greece, the exposure is measured at 153 positions spread over 55 indoor microenvironments with spectral equipment. In addition, personal exposimeters (measuring EMFs of people during their daily activities) captured the temporal exposure variations during several days up to one week at 98 positions. The data were analyzed using the robust regression on order statistics (ROS) method to account for data below the detection limit. All instantaneous and maximal exposures satisfied international exposure limits and were of the same order of magnitude in Greece and Belgium. Mobile telecommunications and radio broadcasting (FM) were most present. In Belgium, digital cordless phone (DECT) exposure was present for at least 75% in the indoor microenvironments except for schools. Temporal variations of the exposure were mainly due to variations of mobile telecommunication signals. The exposure was higher during daytime than at night due to the increased voice and data traffic on the networks. Total exposure varied the most in Belgian crèches (39.3%) and Greek homes (58.2%).

[1]  Wout Joseph,et al.  INFLUENCE OF MOBILE PHONE TRAFFIC ON BASE STATION EXPOSURE OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC , 2010, Health physics.

[2]  Joe Wiart,et al.  Influence of traffic variations on exposure to wireless signals in realistic environments. , 2012, Bioelectromagnetics.

[3]  I. Cosic,et al.  Factors influencing uncertainty in measurement of electric fields close to the body in personal RF dosimetry. , 2010, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[4]  W. Soichi,et al.  Guidelines for limiting exposure to electric fields induced by movement of the human body in a static magnetic field and by time-varying magnetic fields below 1 Hz. , 2014, Health physics.

[5]  M. Egger,et al.  Statistical analysis of personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field measurements with nondetects , 2008, Bioelectromagnetics.

[6]  Elisabeth Cardis,et al.  Radiofrequency exposure in the French general population: band, time, location and activity variability. , 2009, Environment international.

[7]  William C. Y. Lee,et al.  Mobile Communications Design Fundamentals: Lee/Mobile , 1993 .

[8]  Simon Mann,et al.  Assessing personal exposures to environmental radiofrequency electromagnetic fields , 2010 .

[9]  Luc Martens,et al.  In-Situ Measurement Procedures for Temporal RF Electromagnetic Field Exposure of the General Public , 2009, Health physics.

[10]  Georg Neubauer,et al.  A model for radiofrequency electromagnetic field predictions at outdoor and indoor locations in the context of epidemiological research , 2009, Bioelectromagnetics.

[11]  Achilles Boursianis,et al.  Continuous electromagnetic radiation monitoring in the environment: analysis of the results in Greece. , 2012, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[12]  Luc Martens,et al.  Conduct of a personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field measurement study: proposed study protocol , 2010, Environmental health : a global access science source.

[13]  Johannes Tomitsch,et al.  Survey of electromagnetic field exposure in bedrooms of residences in lower Austria. , 2010, Bioelectromagnetics.

[14]  William C. Y. Lee,et al.  Mobile Communications Design Fundamentals , 1986 .

[15]  Luc Martens,et al.  Assessment of RF Exposures from Emerging Wireless Communication Technologies in Different Environments , 2012, Health physics.

[16]  Gábor Jánossy,et al.  RF personal exposimetry on employees of elementary schools, kindergartens and day nurseries as a proxy for child exposures. , 2011, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[17]  Thomas R. Gatliffe,et al.  Nondetects and Data Analysis , 2006, Technometrics.

[18]  Georg Neubauer,et al.  Temporal and spatial variability of personal exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields. , 2009, Environmental research.

[19]  Györgyi Kubinyi,et al.  Personal RF exposimetry in urban area , 2008, Ann. des Télécommunications.

[20]  G. Thuróczy,et al.  Comparison of personal radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure in different urban areas across Europe. , 2010, Environmental research.

[21]  Luc Martens,et al.  CHARACTERIZATION OF PERSONAL RF ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EXPOSURE AND ACTUAL ABSORPTION FOR THE GENERAL PUBLIC , 2008, Health physics.

[22]  Sam Agneessens,et al.  Personal distributed exposimeter for radio frequency exposure assessment in real environments , 2013, Bioelectromagnetics.

[23]  S Mann,et al.  Exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields from wireless computer networks: duty factors of Wi-Fi devices operating in schools. , 2011, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[24]  A. Ahlbom.  Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz) , 1998 .