Extraction of common task signals and spatial maps from group fMRI using a PARAFAC-based tensor decomposition technique

Blind source separation (BSS) using independent component based analysis (e.g., probabilistic ICA and infomax ICA) have been studied in-depth to extract common hemodynamic sources for a group of functional magnetic resonance images (fMRI). The inherent assumption here is that the sources must be non-Gaussian. For most of the real world data, the decomposition is non-unique. Furthermore, there is no quantitative way to determine the component(s) of interest common for the group. This paper shows that using a novel constrained Parallel Factor Analysis (PARAFAC)-based tensor decomposition, one can extract the common task signals and spatial maps from a group of noisy fMRI as rank-1 tensors. The extracted hemodynamic signals have very high correlation with ideal hemodynamic response. A quantitative algorithm to extract common components for a group of subjects is also presented. The modified decomposition preserves the uniqueness under mild conditions which is the most attractive feature for any PARAFAC-based tensor decomposition approach.

[1]  Sabine Van Huffel,et al.  The power of tensor decompositions in biomedical applications , 2016 .

[2]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Advances and Pitfalls in the Analysis and Interpretation of Resting-State FMRI Data , 2010, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[3]  L. Tucker,et al.  Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis , 1966, Psychometrika.

[4]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview , 2013, NeuroImage.

[5]  N. Cliff Orthogonal rotation to congruence , 1966 .

[6]  J. Pekar,et al.  A method for making group inferences from functional MRI data using independent component analysis , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[7]  Charles L. Lawson,et al.  Solving least squares problems , 1976, Classics in applied mathematics.

[8]  Pierre Comon,et al.  Canonical Polyadic Decomposition with a Columnwise Orthonormal Factor Matrix , 2012, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl..

[9]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Group-PCA for very large fMRI datasets , 2014, NeuroImage.

[10]  E. Acar,et al.  Seizure Recognition on Epilepsy Feature Tensor , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[11]  Nikos D. Sidiropoulos,et al.  Tensor Decomposition for Signal Processing and Machine Learning , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[12]  Henk A. L. Kiers,et al.  An efficient algorithm for PARAFAC of three-way data with large numbers of observation units , 1991 .

[13]  André Lima Férrer de Almeida,et al.  Overview of constrained PARAFAC models , 2014, EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing.

[14]  Keshab K. Parhi,et al.  Classification of obsessive-compulsive disorder from resting-state fMRI , 2016, 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[15]  J. Pekar,et al.  fMRI Activation in a Visual-Perception Task: Network of Areas Detected Using the General Linear Model and Independent Components Analysis , 2001, NeuroImage.

[16]  C. F. Beckmann,et al.  Tensorial extensions of independent component analysis for multisubject FMRI analysis , 2005, NeuroImage.

[17]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[18]  William S Rayens,et al.  Structure-seeking multilinear methods for the analysis of fMRI data , 2004, NeuroImage.

[19]  Nikos D. Sidiropoulos,et al.  Kruskal's permutation lemma and the identification of CANDECOMP/PARAFAC and bilinear models with constant modulus constraints , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[20]  R. Bro PARAFAC. Tutorial and applications , 1997 .