Several threshold estimation (and thus anomaly recognition) procedures are in use of exploration geochemistry. Experiential methods rely on absolute values in graphs or tables and are highly subjective in being dependent of the variable experience of explorationists. Model-based subjective techniques of threshold determination, including the mean plus two standard deviations, are arbitrary and inefficient: thus, they are not suitalbe despite the widespread use they have found in the past. Model-based objective methods include the gap statistic and the probability graph approaches, the latter finding much greater acceptance with the greatly increased ease of a recently available microcomputer software package that can treat many variables easily and rapidly.
Many critical decisions in exploration geochemistry require a comprehensive interpretation of available data, including clear insight into the recognition of anomalous and background samples. Several decisions cannot be made in a vigorous and confident manner unless based on a fundamental approach to threshold selection. Examples include: (1) element zoning in geochemistry: (2) absolute estimation of geochemical contrast: (3) the recognition of the isotropic or anisotropic nature of anomalies: and (4) an estimation of areal extent of anomalies of various elements.
Methods of threshold estimation which incorporate the philosophy that anomalous and background data are each characterized by their own probability density functions will be most successful in deriving a fundamental approach to threshold estimation. In the simplest general case, there are two overlapping populations, the overlapping character leading naturally to the extension of the single threshold concept to the definition of two thresholds that delimit the range of overlap. Such a concept, easily conceived and applied to individual variables, can be extended to the n-dimensional case. Univariate approaches will continue to dominate practical applications in the foreseeable future except in special circumstances.
[1]
W. K. Fletcher,et al.
Analytical Methods in Geochemical Prospecting
,
1981
.
[2]
Robert G. Garnett.
Applications of Probability Graphs in Mineral Exploration
,
1977
.
[3]
Clifford R. Stanley,et al.
Comparison of probability plots and the gap statistic in the selection of thresholds for exploration geochemistry data
,
1989
.
[4]
A. Journel.
Nonparametric estimation of spatial distributions
,
1983
.
[5]
R. P. Chapman,et al.
Exploration geochemistry—Distribution of elements and recognition of anomalies
,
1975
.
[6]
A. Sinclair.
Selection of threshold values in geochemical data using probability graphs
,
1974
.
[7]
A. T. Miesch.
Estimation of the geochemical threshold and its statistical significance
,
1981
.
[8]
Clifford R. Stanley,et al.
Anomaly recognition for multi-element geochemical data — A background characterization approach
,
1987
.
[9]
D. Shaw.
Element distribution laws in geochemistry
,
1961
.
[10]
A. J. Sinclair,et al.
Exploration geochemistry : design and interpretation of soil surveys
,
1986
.