Non-parametric directionality analysis – Extension for removal of a single common predictor and application to time series

BACKGROUND The ability to infer network structure from multivariate neuronal signals is central to computational neuroscience. Directed network analyses typically use parametric approaches based on auto-regressive (AR) models, where networks are constructed from estimates of AR model parameters. However, the validity of using low order AR models for neurophysiological signals has been questioned. A recent article introduced a non-parametric approach to estimate directionality in bivariate data, non-parametric approaches are free from concerns over model validity. NEW METHOD We extend the non-parametric framework to include measures of directed conditional independence, using scalar measures that decompose the overall partial correlation coefficient summatively by direction, and a set of functions that decompose the partial coherence summatively by direction. A time domain partial correlation function allows both time and frequency views of the data to be constructed. The conditional independence estimates are conditioned on a single predictor. RESULTS The framework is applied to simulated cortical neuron networks and mixtures of Gaussian time series data with known interactions. It is applied to experimental data consisting of local field potential recordings from bilateral hippocampus in anaesthetised rats. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S) The framework offers a non-parametric approach to estimation of directed interactions in multivariate neuronal recordings, and increased flexibility in dealing with both spike train and time series data. CONCLUSIONS The framework offers a novel alternative non-parametric approach to estimate directed interactions in multivariate neuronal recordings, and is applicable to spike train and time series data.

[1]  D. B. Preston Spectral Analysis and Time Series , 1983 .

[2]  B. Conway,et al.  Detection of weak synaptic interactions between single Ia afferent and motor‐unit spike trains in the decerebrate cat. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  C. Granger Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods , 1969 .

[4]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[5]  Michael Eichler,et al.  Abstract Journal of Neuroscience Methods xxx (2005) xxx–xxx Testing for directed influences among neural signals using partial directed coherence , 2005 .

[6]  Marcus Kaiser,et al.  A tutorial in connectome analysis: Topological and spatial features of brain networks , 2011, NeuroImage.

[7]  D. Chicharro,et al.  On the spectral formulation of Granger causality , 2011, Biological Cybernetics.

[8]  Karl A. Fox,et al.  Methods of Correlation and Regression Analysis. , 1960 .

[9]  A. Destexhe,et al.  The high-conductance state of neocortical neurons in vivo , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[10]  R. Mason,et al.  Inhibition of endocannabinoid metabolism attenuates enhanced hippocampal neuronal activity induced by kainic acid , 2008, Synapse.

[11]  W. Gersch Causality or driving in electrophysiological signal analysis , 1972 .

[12]  David A. Pierce,et al.  Measurement of Linear Dependence and Feedback Between Multiple Time Series: Comment , 1982 .

[13]  Rainer Dahlhaus,et al.  Partial correlation analysis for the identification of synaptic connections , 2003, Biological Cybernetics.

[14]  David M. Halliday Spike-Train Analysis for Neural Systems , 2005 .

[15]  J. Geweke,et al.  Measurement of Linear Dependence and Feedback between Multiple Time Series , 1982 .

[16]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Analyzing information flow in brain networks with nonparametric Granger causality , 2008, NeuroImage.

[17]  Luiz A. Baccalá,et al.  Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[18]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Estimating Granger causality from fourier and wavelet transforms of time series data. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[19]  David R. Brillinger,et al.  Time Series: Data Analysis and Theory. , 1982 .

[20]  D. Brillinger Fourier analysis of stationary processes , 1974 .

[21]  Donald B. Percival,et al.  Spectral Analysis for Physical Applications , 1993 .

[22]  J. R. Rosenberg,et al.  Identification of patterns of neuronal connectivity—partial spectra, partial coherence, and neuronal interactions , 1998, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[23]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Undirected graphs of frequency-dependent functional connectivity in whole brain networks , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  A. T. Walden,et al.  Graphical modelling for brain connectivity via partial coherence , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[25]  D. A. Pierce R 2 Measures for Time Series , 1979 .

[26]  D. Brillinger Time series - data analysis and theory , 1981, Classics in applied mathematics.

[27]  J. R. Rosenberg,et al.  Identification of directed interactions in networks , 2011, Biological Cybernetics.

[28]  J. Geweke,et al.  Measures of Conditional Linear Dependence and Feedback between Time Series , 1984 .

[29]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  MMSE whitening and subspace whitening , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[30]  Alain Destexhe,et al.  High-conductance state , 2007, Scholarpedia.

[31]  D. Brillinger Some Statistical Methods for Random Process Data from Seismology and Neurophysiology , 1988 .

[32]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[33]  David M Halliday,et al.  Nonparametric directionality measures for time series and point process data. , 2015, Journal of integrative neuroscience.

[34]  J. R. Rosenberg,et al.  The Fourier approach to the identification of functional coupling between neuronal spike trains. , 1989, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[35]  Kenneth D. Miller,et al.  Physiological Gain Leads to High ISI Variability in a Simple Model of a Cortical Regular Spiking Cell , 1997, Neural Computation.

[36]  K. Kendrick,et al.  Partial Granger causality—Eliminating exogenous inputs and latent variables , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[37]  C. Granger Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods , 1969 .

[38]  A M Amjad,et al.  A framework for the analysis of mixed time series/point process data--theory and application to the study of physiological tremor, single motor unit discharges and electromyograms. , 1995, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[39]  S. Bressler,et al.  Frequency decomposition of conditional Granger causality and application to multivariate neural field potential data , 2006, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.