Household, community, sub-national and country-level predictors of primary cooking fuel switching in nine countries from the PURE study

Introduction. Switching from polluting (e.g. wood, crop waste, coal) to clean (e.g. gas, electricity) cooking fuels can reduce household air pollution exposures and climate-forcing emissions. While studies have evaluated specific interventions and assessed fuel-switching in repeated cross-sectional surveys, the role of different multilevel factors in household fuel switching, outside of interventions and across diverse community settings, is not well understood. Methods. We examined longitudinal survey data from 24 172 households in 177 rural communities across nine countries within the Prospective Urban and Rural Epidemiology study. We assessed household-level primary cooking fuel switching during a median of 10 years of follow up (∼2005–2015). We used hierarchical logistic regression models to examine the relative importance of household, community, sub-national and national-level factors contributing to primary fuel switching. Results. One-half of study households (12 369) reported changing their primary cooking fuels between baseline and follow up surveys. Of these, 61% (7582) switched from polluting (wood, dung, agricultural waste, charcoal, coal, kerosene) to clean (gas, electricity) fuels, 26% (3109) switched between different polluting fuels, 10% (1164) switched from clean to polluting fuels and 3% (522) switched between different clean fuels. Among the 17 830 households using polluting cooking fuels at baseline, household-level factors (e.g. larger household size, higher wealth, higher education level) were most strongly associated with switching from polluting to clean fuels in India; in all other countries, community-level factors (e.g. larger population density in 2010, larger increase in population density between 2005 and 2015) were the strongest predictors of polluting-to-clean fuel switching. Conclusions. The importance of community and sub-national factors relative to household characteristics in determining polluting-to-clean fuel switching varied dramatically across the nine countries examined. This highlights the potential importance of national and other contextual factors in shaping large-scale clean cooking transitions among rural communities in low- and middle-income countries.

[1]  M. Brauer,et al.  Health Effects of Household Solid Fuel Use: Findings from 11 Countries within the Prospective Urban and Rural Epidemiology Study , 2019, Environmental health perspectives.

[2]  J. Ravenscroft,et al.  Country-level analysis of household fuel transitions , 2019, World Development.

[3]  H. Kan,et al.  Solid Fuel Use and Risks of Respiratory Diseases. A Cohort Study of 280,000 Chinese Never-Smokers , 2019, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[4]  Vania Vigolo,et al.  Drivers and Barriers to Clean Cooking: A Systematic Literature Review from a Consumer Behavior Perspective , 2018, Sustainability.

[5]  Jiming Hao,et al.  Change in household fuels dominates the decrease in PM2.5 exposure and premature mortality in China in 2005–2015 , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  M. Brauer,et al.  Global household air pollution database: Kitchen concentrations and personal exposures of particulate matter and carbon monoxide , 2018, Data in brief.

[7]  Katherine L. Dickinson,et al.  An analysis of efforts to scale up clean household energy for cooking around the world. , 2018, Energy for sustainable development : the journal of the International Energy Initiative.

[8]  A. Cohen,et al.  Global Sources of Fine Particulate Matter: Interpretation of PM2.5 Chemical Composition Observed by SPARTAN using a Global Chemical Transport Model. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  H. Zerriffi,et al.  From cookstove acquisition to cooking transition: Framing the behavioural aspects of cookstove interventions , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[10]  Kwaku Poku Asante,et al.  Enhancing LPG adoption in Ghana (ELAG): a factorial cluster-randomized controlled trial to Enhance LPG Adoption & Sustained use , 2018, BMC Public Health.

[11]  Hua Liao,et al.  Household cooking fuel choice and economic poverty: Evidence from a nationwide survey in China , 2018 .

[12]  M. Brauer,et al.  Characterizing exposure to household air pollution within the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study. , 2018, Environment international.

[13]  F. Hu,et al.  Association of Solid Fuel Use With Risk of Cardiovascular and All-Cause Mortality in Rural China , 2018, JAMA.

[14]  Qi Zhang,et al.  Rural Household Energy Use and Its Determinants in China: How Important Are Influences of Payment for Ecosystem Services vs. Other Factors? , 2018 .

[15]  Huijie Yan,et al.  Household Fuel Use in Rural China , 2018 .

[16]  M. Handley,et al.  Designing a behavioral intervention using the COM-B model and the theoretical domains framework to promote gas stove use in rural Guatemala: a formative research study , 2018, BMC Public Health.

[17]  Sotiris Vardoulakis,et al.  Taking Action on Air Pollution Control in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) Region: Progress, Challenges and Opportunities , 2018, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[18]  K. Battle,et al.  A global map of travel time to cities to assess inequalities in accessibility in 2015 , 2018, Nature.

[19]  M. Brauer,et al.  Elevated blood pressure and household solid fuel use in premenopausal women: Analysis of 12 Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) from 10 countries , 2018, Environmental research.

[20]  R. Brownson,et al.  Adoption and sustained use of cleaner cooking fuels in rural India: a case control study protocol to understand household, network, and organizational drivers , 2017, Archives of Public Health.

[21]  Liese C C Pruitt,et al.  Household air pollution and angiogenic factors in pregnant Nigerian women: A randomized controlled ethanol cookstove intervention. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[22]  D. Bennett,et al.  Trans-generational changes and rural-urban inequality in household fuel use and cookstove ventilation in China: A multi-region study of 0.5 million adults. , 2017, International journal of hygiene and environmental health.

[23]  D. Jamison,et al.  Household Energy Interventions and Health and Finances in Haryana, India: An Extended Cost-Effectiveness Analysis , 2017 .

[24]  S. Pachauri,et al.  Environmental payoffs of LPG cooking in India , 2017 .

[25]  M. Ezzati,et al.  Adoption and use of a semi-gasifier cooking and water heating stove and fuel intervention in the Tibetan Plateau, China , 2017 .

[26]  Anindita Dutta,et al.  Randomized Controlled Ethanol Cookstove Intervention and Blood Pressure in Pregnant Nigerian Women , 2017, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[27]  Daven K. Henze,et al.  Transient climate and ambient health impacts due to national solid fuel cookstove emissions , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Jiming Hao,et al.  Impacts of household coal and biomass combustion on indoor and ambient air quality in China: Current status and implication. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[29]  M. Ezzati,et al.  Household energy and health: where next for research and practice? , 2017, The Lancet.

[30]  Gila Neta,et al.  Implementation Science to Accelerate Clean Cooking for Public Health , 2017, Environmental health perspectives.

[31]  Anindita Dutta,et al.  Effect of a clean stove intervention on inflammatory biomarkers in pregnant women in Ibadan, Nigeria: A randomized controlled study. , 2017, Environment international.

[32]  Shu Tao,et al.  Transition of household cookfuels in China from 2010 to 2012 , 2016 .

[33]  Christopher O. Olopade,et al.  Sustained usage of bioethanol cookstoves shown in an urban Nigerian city via new SUMs algorithm , 2016 .

[34]  Qingyang Xiao,et al.  The Regional Impacts of Cooking and Heating Emissions on Ambient Air Quality and Disease Burden in China. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[35]  H. Annegarn,et al.  Domestic LPG interventions in South Africa: Challenges and lessons , 2016 .

[36]  Eva A Rehfuess,et al.  Clean fuels for resource-poor settings: A systematic review of barriers and enablers to adoption and sustained use. , 2016, Environmental research.

[37]  Kwaku Poku Asante,et al.  Association of Carbon Monoxide exposure with blood pressure among pregnant women in rural Ghana: Evidence from GRAPHS. , 2016, International journal of hygiene and environmental health.

[38]  Subhrendu K. Pattanayak,et al.  How much do alternative cookstoves reduce biomass fuel use? Evidence from North India. , 2016 .

[39]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015 , 2016, Lancet.

[40]  D. Rodríguez,et al.  Drivers of household food availability in sub-Saharan Africa based on big data from small farms , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  O. Masera,et al.  Environmental Burden of Traditional Bioenergy Use , 2015 .

[42]  Weiwei Lin,et al.  Factors influencing the adoption and sustainable use of clean fuels and cookstoves in China -a Chinese literature review , 2015 .

[43]  Subhrendu K. Pattanayak,et al.  The Economics of Household Air Pollution , 2015 .

[44]  Jonathan S. Lefcheck,et al.  piecewiseSEM: Piecewise structural equation modelling in r for ecology, evolution, and systematics , 2015, 1509.01845.

[45]  Johannes Urpelainen,et al.  Socio-economic determinants of charcoal expenditures in Tanzania: Evidence from panel data , 2015 .

[46]  R. Hanna,et al.  Moving Up the Energy Ladder: The Effect of an Increase in Economic Well-Being on the Fuel Consumption Choices of the Poor in India , 2015 .

[47]  Sumi Mehta,et al.  Behavior Change Communication: A Key Ingredient for Advancing Clean Cooking , 2015, Journal of health communication.

[48]  Ranyee A. Chiang,et al.  Quantitative Guidance for Stove Usage and Performance to Achieve Health and Environmental Targets , 2015, Environmental health perspectives.

[49]  Omar Masera,et al.  Patterns of Stove Use in the Context of Fuel–Device Stacking: Rationale and Implications , 2015, EcoHealth.

[50]  Guofeng Shen,et al.  Household fuel use for cooking and heating in China: Results from the first Chinese Environmental Exposure-Related Human Activity Patterns Survey (CEERHAPS) , 2014 .

[51]  J. Jaakkola,et al.  Household Air Pollution from Solid Fuel Use and Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Evidence , 2014, PloS one.

[52]  Narendra K. Arora,et al.  Patterns of Stove Usage after Introduction of an Advanced Cookstove: The Long-Term Application of Household Sensors , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[53]  S. Yusuf,et al.  The association between ownership of common household devices and obesity and diabetes in high, middle and low income countries , 2014, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[54]  Elisa Puzzolo,et al.  Factors influencing the large-scale uptake by households of cleaner and more efficient household energy technologies , 2013 .

[55]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study: Baseline characteristics of the household sample and comparative analyses with national data in 17 countries. , 2013, American heart journal.

[56]  S. Nautiyal A transition from wood fuel to LPG and its impact on energy conservation and health in the Central Himalayas, India , 2013, Journal of Mountain Science.

[57]  Nebojsa Nakicenovic,et al.  Pathways to achieve universal household access to modern energy by 2030 , 2013 .

[58]  F. X. Johnson,et al.  Evaluating the relative strength of product-specific factors in fuel switching and stove choice decisions in Ethiopia. A discrete choice model of household preferences for clean cooking alternatives , 2012 .

[59]  W. Wong,et al.  Comparison of methods for estimating the intraclass correlation coefficient for binary responses in cancer prevention cluster randomized trials. , 2012, Contemporary clinical trials.

[60]  Robert Bailis,et al.  Low demand for nontraditional cookstove technologies , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[61]  J. Ayres,et al.  Lung cancer risk and solid fuel smoke exposure: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2012, European Respiratory Journal.

[62]  Subhrendu K. Pattanayak,et al.  Who Adopts Improved Fuels and Cookstoves? A Systematic Review , 2012, Environmental health perspectives.

[63]  Hisham Zerriffi,et al.  Three dimensional energy profile , 2011 .

[64]  Milind Kandlikar,et al.  Health and climate benefits of cookstove replacement options , 2011 .

[65]  Ken R. Smith,et al.  Adoption and sustained use of improved cookstoves , 2011 .

[66]  P. S. Praveen,et al.  Black carbon emissions from biomass and fossil fuels in rural India , 2011 .

[67]  H. Zerriffi,et al.  Three dimensional energy profile : A conceptual framework for assessing household energy use , 2011 .

[68]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Multilevel Analysis , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[69]  Jon G Ayres,et al.  COPD and chronic bronchitis risk of indoor air pollution from solid fuel: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2010, Thorax.

[70]  Nicholas M. Odhiambo,et al.  Electricity consumption and economic growth in South Africa: A trivariate causality test , 2009 .

[71]  Salim Yusuf,et al.  The Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study: examining the impact of societal influences on chronic noncommunicable diseases in low-, middle-, and high-income countries. , 2009, American heart journal.

[72]  G. V. D. Horst,et al.  Reassessing the “energy ladder”: Household energy use in Maun, Botswana , 2008 .

[73]  Daniel Pope,et al.  Indoor air pollution from unprocessed solid fuel use and pneumonia risk in children aged under five years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2008, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[74]  Huapu Lu,et al.  Urban transportation and equity: A case study of Beijing and Karachi , 2008 .

[75]  H. Folmer,et al.  Fuel switching in Harare : An almost ideal demand system approach , 2007 .

[76]  Marrit van den Berg,et al.  Energy consumption in rural China: A household model for three villages in Jiangxi Province , 2006 .

[77]  Gunnar Köhlin,et al.  Preferences for domestic fuel: Analysis with socio-economic factors and rankings in Kolkata, India , 2006 .

[78]  Kerry Krutilla,et al.  The Urban Household Energy Transition: Social and Environmental Impacts in the Developing World , 2005 .

[79]  Amod K Pokhrel,et al.  Case-control study of indoor cooking smoke exposure and cataract in Nepal and India. , 2005, International journal of epidemiology.

[80]  R. Heltberg,et al.  Fuel switching: evidence from eight developing countries , 2004 .

[81]  June,et al.  Household Fuel Use and Fuel Switching in Guatemala , 2003 .

[82]  G. A. Marcoulides,et al.  Multilevel Analysis Techniques and Applications , 2002 .

[83]  Jack E. Houston,et al.  Estimating Housing Quality for Poverty and Development Policy Analysis: CWIQ in Ghana , 2001 .

[84]  Daniel M. Kammen,et al.  From Linear Fuel Switching to Multiple Cooking Strategies: A Critique and Alternative to the Energy Ladder Model , 2000 .

[85]  Gerald Leach,et al.  The energy transition , 1992 .