The social media balancing act: Testing the use of a balanced self-presentation strategy for politicians using twitter

Abstract Politicians' clear separation between their professional and private lives has been challenged by a growing need to be seen as personable, especially on social media where this is the norm. Little, however, is known about the effect on a political party when its politicians reveal aspects of their private lives on social media. The present study addresses this question. Through the lens of self-presentation theory, we are the first to test the effect of a balanced presentation strategy on Twitter (i.e., tweets that involve both professional and private aspects of their lives) as opposed to a strictly professional one. A longitudinal design was adopted with 265 Twitter users as participants. The results showed that a balanced strategy increased both interest in the politician's party and intention to vote for that party, irrespective of a user's political interest, social media usage intensity, or age, or the gender of either the user or the communicating politician. Furthermore, liking the tweets emerged as a crucial mediator. This study contributes valuable knowledge on self-presentation strategies of politicians specifically, and more broadly regarding self-presentation in the face of context collapse. However we call for future research to validate our experimental findings in a real-life setting. Implications are provided for political parties and others.

[1]  A. Schütz,et al.  Assertive, offensive, protective, and defensive styles of self-presentation: a taxonomy. , 1998, The Journal of psychology.

[2]  Charles Edgley,et al.  Death as Theater: A Dramaturgical Analysis of the American Funeral , 2017 .

[3]  Namkee Park,et al.  Online environmental community members' intention to participate in environmental activities: An application of the theory of planned behavior in the Chinese context , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[4]  James N. Druckman,et al.  The Power of Television Images: The First Kennedy-Nixon Debate Revisited , 2003, The Journal of Politics.

[5]  A. Alexandrov.  Characteristics of Single-Item Measures in Likert Scale Format , 2010 .

[6]  Junghyun Kim,et al.  The effect of uniform virtual appearance on conformity intention: Social identity model of deindividuation effects and optimal distinctiveness theory , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[7]  Spencer E. Cahill,et al.  Meanwhile Backstage , 1985 .

[8]  I. Altman,et al.  Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships , 1973 .

[9]  Jagdish N. Sheth,et al.  A framework for managing customer expectations , 1996 .

[10]  M. Leary.  Self-Presentation , 2019 .

[11]  R. Kuhn,et al.  'Vive La Différence'? The Mediation of Politicians' Public Images and Private Lives in France , 2004 .

[12]  Danah Boyd,et al.  I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience , 2011, New Media Soc..

[13]  Zizi Papacharissi.  Without You, I'm Nothing: Performances of the Self on Twitter , 2012 .

[14]  Peter Van Aelst,et al.  The personalization of mediated political communication: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings , 2012 .

[15]  Vincent Miller.  New Media, Networking and Phatic Culture , 2008 .

[16]  Ward van Zoonen,et al.  Social media’s dark side: inducing boundary conflicts , 2016 .

[17]  Isabell M. Welpe,et al.  Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal about Political Sentiment , 2010, ICWSM.

[18]  Eun-Ju Lee,et al.  Are They Talking to Me? Cognitive and Affective Effects of Interactivity in Politicians' Twitter Communication , 2012, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[19]  Ward van Zoonen,et al.  How employees use Twitter to talk about work: A typology of work-related tweets , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[20]  Leonard Reinecke,et al.  The reciprocal effects of social network site use and the disposition for self-disclosure: A longitudinal study , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[21]  John H. Parmelee,et al.  Politics and the Twitter Revolution: How Tweets Influence the Relationship between Political Leaders and the Public , 2011 .

[22]  J. Rossiter,et al.  The Predictive Validity of Multiple-Item versus Single-Item Measures of the Same Constructs , 2007 .

[23]  Young Min Baek,et al.  Political mobilization through social network sites: The mobilizing power of political messages received from SNS friends , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[24]  Soo Youn Oh,et al.  To Personalize or Depersonalize? When and How Politicians' Personalized Tweets Affect the Public's Reactions , 2012 .

[25]  Meindert Fennema,et al.  Some Conceptual Issues and Problems in the Comparison of Anti-Immigrant Parties in Western Europe , 1997 .

[26]  Michael Bourlakis,et al.  Do websites influence the nature of voting intentions? The case of two national elections in Greece , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[27]  Gianpietro Mazzoleni,et al.  The politics of representation : election campaigning and proportional representation , 2004 .

[28]  Rajesh Sethi,et al.  The role of interpersonal liking in building trust in long-term channel relationships , 2001 .

[29]  C. Veloutsou,et al.  Brand relationships through brand reputation and brand tribalism , 2009 .

[30]  A. Langer,et al.  The Politicization of Private Persona: Exceptional Leaders or the New Rule? The Case of the United Kingdom and the Blair Effect , 2010 .

[31]  Ben Wasike,et al.  Persuasion in 140 characters: Testing issue framing, persuasion and credibility via Twitter and online news articles in the gun control debate , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[32]  Victoria A. Farrar-Myers,et al.  Controlling the Message: New Media in American Political Campaigns , 2015 .

[33]  Andrew J. Rohm,et al.  Social Media and Value Creation: The Role of Interaction Satisfaction and Interaction Immersion , 2016 .

[34]  Hayeon Song,et al.  Celebrity’s Self-Disclosure on Twitter and Parasocial Relationships: A Mediating Role of Social Presence , 2016 .

[35]  Patti M. Valkenburg,et al.  Sexual self-presentation on social network sites: Who does it and how is it perceived? , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[36]  Ale Smidts,et al.  Brain Responses to Movie Trailers Predict Individual Preferences for Movies and Their Population-Wide Commercial Success , 2015 .

[37]  Chang Sup Park,et al.  Does Twitter motivate involvement in politics? Tweeting, opinion leadership, and political engagement , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[38]  C. Mirabel-Sarron.  [Social anxiety]. , 2010, La Revue du praticien.

[39]  Theresa M. Senft.  Camgirls: Celebrity and Community in the Age of Social Networks , 2008 .

[40]  Emma L. Slade,et al.  "I like them, but won't 'like' them": An examination of impression management associated with visible political party affiliation on Facebook , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[41]  Nils-Christian Bormann,et al.  Democratic Electoral Systems around the world, 1946–2020 , 2005, Electoral Studies.

[42]  Sameer Patil,et al.  Balancing Audience and Privacy Tensions on Social Network Sites: Strategies of Highly Engaged Users , 2015 .

[43]  Rens Vliegenthart,et al.  Getting closer: The effects of personalized and interactive online political communication , 2013 .

[44]  Hayeon Song,et al.  Celebrity's self-disclosure on Twitter and parasocial relationships: A mediating role of social presence , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[45]  N. Denzin.  The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods , 1977 .

[46]  C. Allen,et al.  The Mature Brand and Brand Interest: An Alternative Consequence of Ad-Evoked Affect , 1993 .

[47]  E. Goffman.  The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[48]  G. Ye,et al.  Brand equity: extending brand awareness and liking with Signal Detection Theory , 2004 .

[49]  Ben L. Marder,et al.  Every Post You Make, Every Pic You Take, I'll Be Watching You: Behind Social Spheres on Facebook , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[50]  Golan Shahar,et al.  Strategic self-presentation on Facebook: Personal motives and audience response to online behavior , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[51]  Sanne Kruikemeier,et al.  How political candidates use Twitter and the impact on votes , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[52]  Andrew Howes,et al.  The problem of conflicting social spheres: effects of network structure on experienced tension in social network sites , 2009, CHI.

[53]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  How and why people Twitter: the role that micro-blogging plays in informal communication at work , 2009, GROUP.

[54]  Eva Lahuerta-Otero,et al.  Looking for the perfect tweet. The use of data mining techniques to find influencers on twitter , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[55]  Rebecca Ping Yu,et al.  The relationship between passive and active non-political social media use and political expression on Facebook and Twitter , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[56]  Scott Appelrouth,et al.  Classical and Contemporary Sociological Theory: Text and Readings , 2007 .

[57]  Jan Kleinnijenhuis,et al.  Issues and Personalities in German and Dutch Television News , 2001 .

[58]  Ben L. Marder,et al.  Strength matters: Self-presentation to the strongest audience rather than lowest common denominator when faced with multiple audiences in social network sites , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[59]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis , 2010 .

[60]  Todd Graham,et al.  New platform, old habits? Candidates’ use of Twitter during the 2010 British and Dutch general election campaigns , 2016, New Media Soc..

[61]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.