Plant-wide control structure selection methodology based on economics

Abstract An important and challenging problem is the determination of appropriate control structures that minimize the loss of process performance under the effect of uncertainties. This can be achieved by selecting subsets of controlled and manipulated variables and designing their interconnection. In this paper, a systematic optimization methodology for the Control Structure Selection Problem (CSSP) is presented. The proposed formulation (a) improves the accuracy of calculations and (b) reduces computational time and effort necessary. Specifically, the error involved in the approximation of the nonlinear constraint that defines the magnitude of the back-off vector is reduced by the introduction of a more accurate linear approximation. In addition, the methodology is able to handle simultaneously occurring disturbances and estimate their worst impact on process economics. The computational time is significantly reduced by eliminating the state variables from the final formulation. Two case studies are presented to demonstrate the benefits of the proposed algorithm.

[1]  William L. Luyben,et al.  Quantitative comparison of reactive distillation with conventional multiunit reactor/column/recycle systems for different chemical equilibrium constants , 2004 .

[2]  William L. Luyben,et al.  Plantwide Process Control , 1998 .

[3]  J. D. Perkins,et al.  Selection of process control structure based on linear dynamic economics , 1993 .

[4]  William L. Luyben,et al.  Quantitative comparison of dynamic controllability between a reactive distillation column and a conventional multi-unit process , 2008, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[5]  Morten Hovd,et al.  CALCULATING DYNAMIC DISTURBANCE REJECTION MEASURES , 2005 .

[6]  George Stephanopoulos,et al.  Synthesis of control systems for chemical plants A challenge for creativity , 1983 .

[7]  Carlos E. Garcia,et al.  Internal model control. A unifying review and some new results , 1982 .

[8]  Ioannis K. Kookos,et al.  Control Structure Selection of an Ideal Reactive Distillation Column , 2011 .

[9]  C. Floudas,et al.  Structural analysis and synthesis of feasible control systems ― theory and applications , 1989 .

[10]  Ioannis K. Kookos,et al.  An Algorithm for Simultaneous Process Design and Control , 2001 .

[11]  Evanghelos Zafiriou,et al.  Robust process control , 1987 .

[12]  J. D. Perkins,et al.  Process control structure selection based on economics , 2000 .

[13]  Devrim B. Kaymak,et al.  Comparison of two types of two-temperature control structures for reactive distillation columns , 2005 .

[14]  Muhammad A. Al-Arfaj,et al.  Comparison of Alternative Control Structures for an Ideal Two-Product Reactive Distillation Column , 2000 .

[15]  T. McAvoy,et al.  Optimal selection of measurements and manipulated variables for production control , 2010 .

[16]  Efstratios N. Pistikopoulos,et al.  Optimal design of dynamic systems under uncertainty , 1996 .

[17]  Luis A. Ricardez-Sandoval,et al.  Simultaneous Design and Control: A New Approach and Comparisons with Existing Methodologies , 2010 .

[18]  Devrim B. Kaymak,et al.  Evaluation of a two-temperature control structure for a two-reactant/two-product type of reactive distillation column , 2006 .

[19]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  Optimal feed locations and number of trays for distillation columns with multiple feeds , 1993 .

[20]  Charles F. Moore Selection of Controlled and Manipulated Variables , 1992 .

[21]  Sigurd Skogestad,et al.  Optimal measurement combinations as controlled variables , 2009 .