#Smiling, #venting, or both? Adolescents' social sharing of emotions on social media

Abstract Although social media offer adolescents new possibilities for emotion regulation, little is known about how adolescents use different platforms to this end. This study adds to the emotion regulation literature and affordances-of-technologies perspective by describing whether and how adolescents use different social media platforms (Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Twitter, Tumblr, YouTube, 9Gag, and blogs) for emotion sharing and how technical, social, and contextual factors influence these practices. In-depth interviews with 22 adolescents aged 14 to 18 show that adolescents share emotions on multiple of these platforms. Although the different platforms have similar affordances, their social norms clearly differ and influence adolescents’ online behavior. Facebook statuses, Instagram, and Snapchat are mostly used for sharing positive emotions, if emotions are shared at all. Twitter and Messenger, on the other hand, are also used for sharing negative emotions, albeit for different reasons.

[1]  M. Bradley,et al.  Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential. , 1994, Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry.

[2]  Ian Hutchby,et al.  Conversation and Technology: From the Telephone to the Internet , 2001 .

[3]  Suzanne Wilson,et al.  Continuity, stability, and change in daily emotional experience across adolescence. , 2002, Child development.

[4]  June Abbas,et al.  Relationships and social rules: Teens' social network and other ICT selection practices , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[5]  Catalina L. Toma,et al.  Social sharing through interpersonal media: Patterns and effects on emotional well-being , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  J. Zaki,et al.  Interpersonal emotion regulation. , 2013, Emotion.

[7]  Natalya N. Bazarova Public Intimacy: Disclosure Interpretation and Social Judgments on Facebook , 2012 .

[8]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Alexander P. Schouten,et al.  Personal, editable, and always accessible , 2017 .

[10]  Amanda Sheffield Morris,et al.  Adolescents' emotion regulation in daily life: links to depressive symptoms and problem behavior. , 2003, Child development.

[11]  Stephen A. Rains,et al.  What can we learn about social network sites by studying Facebook? A call and recommendations for research on social network sites , 2015, New Media Soc..

[12]  Anthony M. Townsend,et al.  Late adolescent identity definition and intimate disclosure on Facebook , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[13]  Airi Lampinen,et al.  Social norms and self-presentation on social network sites: Profile work in action , 2016, New Media Soc..

[14]  Kirsten E. Gilbert The neglected role of positive emotion in adolescent psychopathology. , 2012, Clinical psychology review.

[15]  B. Rimé Emotion Elicits the Social Sharing of Emotion: Theory and Empirical Review , 2009 .

[16]  Dan Cosley,et al.  Social Sharing of Emotions on Facebook: Channel Differences, Satisfaction, and Replies , 2015, CSCW.

[17]  Rasmus Helles,et al.  Mobile communication and intermediality , 2013 .

[18]  K. Davis Coming of Age Online: The Developmental Underpinnings of Girls’ Blogs , 2010 .

[19]  S. Utz,et al.  Online Coping After Negative Life Events , 2016 .

[20]  L. Goossens Affect, emotion, and loneliness in adolescence , 2006 .

[21]  danah boyd,et al.  It's Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens , 2014 .

[22]  I. Hutchby Technologies, Texts and Affordances , 2001 .

[23]  M. Thelwall,et al.  Data mining emotion in social network communication: Gender differences in MySpace , 2010 .

[24]  I. Hutchby Communicative affordances and participation frameworks in mediated interaction , 2014 .

[25]  Joseph B. Bayer,et al.  Sharing the small moments: ephemeral social interaction on Snapchat , 2016 .

[26]  Peeter W. J. Verlegh,et al.  The social sharing of emotion (SSE) in online social networks: A case study in Live Journal , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[27]  Azy Barak,et al.  Adolescents' use of Instant Messaging as a means of emotional relief , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  D. Boyd Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications , 2010 .

[29]  Urs Gasser,et al.  Teens, social media, and privacy , 2013 .

[30]  Bernard Rimé,et al.  Interpersonal Emotion Regulation. , 2007 .

[31]  Andrew Schrock,et al.  Communicative Affordances of Mobile Media: Portability, Availability, Locatability, and Multimediality , 2015 .

[32]  Katrien Van Cleemput The everyday use of communication technologies in adolescent peer groups : a social network approach , 2012 .

[33]  A. Lenhart Teens, Social Media & Technology Overview 2015 , 2015 .

[34]  Jessica Gall Myrick,et al.  Emotion regulation, procrastination, and watching cat videos online: Who watches Internet cats, why, and to what effect? , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[35]  Jessica Vitak,et al.  Norm evolution and violation on Facebook , 2012, New Media Soc..

[36]  Bernard Rimé,et al.  Motives for the social sharing of an emotional experience , 2015 .

[37]  Mor Naaman,et al.  Network properties and social sharing of emotions in social awareness streams , 2011, CSCW.