On the molecular genetics of flexibility: The case of task-switching, inhibitory control and genetic variants

The adjustment of behavior to changing goals and environmental constraints requires the flexible switching between different task sets. Cognitive flexibility is an endophenotype of executive functioning and is highly heritable, as indicated by twin studies. Individual differences in global flexibility as assessed by reaction-time measurement in a task-switching paradigm were recently related to a single nucleotide polymorphism in the vicinity of the dopamine d2 receptor gene DRD2. In the present study, we assessed whether the DRD2 gene is related to backward inhibition, a control mechanism that contributes to cognitive flexibility by reducing proactive interference by no longer relevant task sets. We found that carriers of the DRD2 A1+ variant who have a lower striatal dopamine d2 receptor density than A1– carriers show a larger backward inhibition effect. This is in line with previous results demonstrating increased behavioral flexibility in carriers of this genetic variant. The discussion relates the present finding to those of previous studies assessing the neurogenetic foundations of inhibitory control.

[1]  E. Noble,et al.  Association of Seven Polymorphisms of the D2 Dopamine Receptor Gene with Brain Receptor-Binding Characteristics , 2004, Neurochemical Research.

[2]  F. Lhermitte 'Utilization behaviour' and its relation to lesions of the frontal lobes. , 1983, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  S. Tipper Does Negative Priming Reflect Inhibitory Mechanisms? A Review and Integration of Conflicting Views , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[4]  Merja Haaparanta,et al.  The A1 allele of the human D2 dopamine receptor gene is associated with increased activity of striatal L-amino acid decarboxylase in healthy subjects , 2005, Pharmacogenetics and genomics.

[5]  A. Miyake,et al.  Individual differences in executive functions are almost entirely genetic in origin. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  T. Carr,et al.  Inhibitory Processes in Attention, Memory and Language , 1994 .

[7]  G. Logan On the ability to inhibit thought and action , 1984 .

[8]  M. Reuter,et al.  The influence of the dopaminergic system on cognitive functioning: A molecular genetic approach , 2005, Behavioural Brain Research.

[9]  A. Grace,et al.  The Catechol-O-Methyltransferase Polymorphism: Relations to the Tonic–Phasic Dopamine Hypothesis and Neuropsychiatric Phenotypes , 2004, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[10]  J. Kwon,et al.  Neural correlates of cognitive inflexibility during task-switching in obsessive-compulsive disorder. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  K. Lesch,et al.  Influence of SLC6A3 and COMT variation on neural activation during response inhibition , 2009, Biological Psychology.

[12]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Cortical and Subcortical Contributions to Stop Signal Response Inhibition: Role of the Subthalamic Nucleus , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  G. E. Alexander,et al.  Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex. , 1986, Annual review of neuroscience.

[14]  T. Robbins Shifting and stopping: fronto-striatal substrates, neurochemical modulation and clinical implications , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Impulsive Personality Predicts Dopamine-Dependent Changes in Frontostriatal Activity during Component Processes of Working Memory , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  C. Montag,et al.  An epistasis effect of functional variants on the BDNF and DRD2 genes modulates gray matter volume of the anterior cingulate cortex in healthy humans , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Common inhibitory mechanism in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by event-related functional MRI. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[18]  Ulrich Ettinger,et al.  Catechol-O-Methyltransferase (COMT) Val158Met Genotype is Associated with BOLD Response as a Function of Task Characteristic , 2008, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[19]  S. Monsell Task-set reconfiguration processes do not imply a control homunuculus: Reply to Altmann , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  R. Straub,et al.  Effect of COMT Val108/158 Met genotype on frontal lobe function and risk for schizophrenia , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[22]  M. Brass,et al.  Involvement of the inferior frontal junction in cognitive control: Meta‐analyses of switching and Stroop studies , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[23]  L. Hasher,et al.  Directed ignoring: Inhibitory regulation of working memory. , 1994 .

[24]  A Baddeley,et al.  Working memory and the control of action: evidence from task switching. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[25]  Thomas E. Hazy,et al.  Towards an executive without a homunculus: computational models of the prefrontal cortex/basal ganglia system , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  A. Cerasa,et al.  The DRD2 TaqIA polymorphism associated with changed midbrain volumes in healthy individuals , 2009, Genes, brain, and behavior.

[27]  Christian Montag,et al.  The Association between Dopamine DRD2 Polymorphisms and Working Memory Capacity Is Modulated by a Functional Polymorphism on the Nicotinic Receptor Gene CHRNA4 , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  S. Keele,et al.  Changing internal constraints on action: the role of backward inhibition. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[29]  C. Montag,et al.  Frontostriatal Involvement in Task Switching Depends on Genetic Differences in D2 Receptor Density , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  T. Robbins,et al.  Impaired set-shifting and dissociable effects on tests of spatial working memory following the dopamine D2 receptor antagonist sulpiride in human volunteers , 2004, Psychopharmacology.

[31]  S. Hutton,et al.  The antisaccade task as a research tool in psychopathology: a critical review. , 2006, Psychophysiology.

[32]  M. J. Emerson,et al.  The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and Their Contributions to Complex “Frontal Lobe” Tasks: A Latent Variable Analysis , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  J. Cohen,et al.  Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. , 2000, Science.

[34]  T. Klingberg,et al.  Prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia control access to working memory , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  T. Robbins,et al.  l-Dopa medication remediates cognitive inflexibility, but increases impulsivity in patients with Parkinson’s disease , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  D. Alan Allport,et al.  SHIFTING INTENTIONAL SET - EXPLORING THE DYNAMIC CONTROL OF TASKS , 1994 .

[37]  Michael C. Anderson,et al.  Remembering can cause forgetting: retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[38]  C. Montag,et al.  Effects of dopamine‐related gene–gene interactions on working memory component processes , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[39]  T. Robbins,et al.  Dissociating executive mechanisms of task control following frontal lobe damage and Parkinson's disease. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[40]  Leonardo Fazio,et al.  Polymorphisms in human dopamine D2 receptor gene affect gene expression, splicing, and neuronal activity during working memory , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.