Application of the Lugano Classification for Initial Evaluation, Staging, and Response Assessment of Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: The PRoLoG Consensus Initiative (Part 1—Clinical)

Our objective was to provide consensus recommendations from a consortium of academic and industry experts in the field of lymphoma and imaging for consistent application of the Lugano classification. Methods: Consensus was obtained through a series of meetings from July 2019 until September 2021 sponsored by the Pharma Imaging Network for Therapeutics and Diagnostics (PINTaD) as part of the PINTaD Response Criteria in Lymphoma Working Group (PRoLoG) consensus initiative. Results: Consensus recommendations clarified technical considerations for PET/CT and diagnostic CT from the Lugano classification, including updating the FDG avidity of different lymphoma entities, clarifying the response nomenclature, and refining lesion classification and scoring, especially with regard to scores 4 and 5 and the X category of the 5-point scale. Combination of metabolic and anatomic responses is clarified, as well as response assessment in cases of discordant or missing evaluations. Use of clinical data in the classification, especially the requirement for bone marrow assessment, is further updated on the basis of lymphoma entities. Clarification is provided with regard to spleen and liver measurements and evaluation, as well as nodal response. Conclusion: Consensus recommendations are made to comprehensively address areas of inconsistency and ambiguity in the classification encountered during response evaluation by end users, and such guidance should be used as a companion to the 2014 Lugano classification.

[1]  R. Boellaard,et al.  Optimal timing and criteria of interim PET in DLBCL: a comparative study of 1692 patients. , 2021, Blood advances.

[2]  S. Barrington,et al.  The role of PET in first-line treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma. , 2021, The Lancet. Haematology.

[3]  S. Barrington,et al.  The role of PET in the first-line treatment of the most common subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. , 2021, The Lancet. Haematology.

[4]  A. Khwaja,et al.  Utility of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in lymphoblastic lymphoma , 2020, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[5]  L. Ceriani,et al.  Present role and future perspective of PET-CT in marginal zone lymphoma , 2020 .

[6]  J. Friedberg,et al.  Relevance of bone marrow biopsies for response assessment in NCTN follicular lymphoma clinical trials. , 2020 .

[7]  L. Sehn,et al.  Impact of bone marrow biopsy on response assessment in immunochemotherapy-treated lymphoma patients in GALLIUM and GOYA. , 2020, Blood advances.

[8]  J. Armitage,et al.  Surveillance in Patients With Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma. , 2020, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[9]  O. Casasnovas,et al.  Prognostic value of FDG-PET in patients with mantle cell lymphoma: results from the LyMa-PET Project , 2020, Haematologica.

[10]  A. Khwaja,et al.  Utility of FDG-PET/CT in Lymphoblastic Lymphoma , 2019, Blood.

[11]  R. Advani,et al.  NCCN Guidelines Insights: B-Cell Lymphomas, Version 3.2019. , 2019, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[12]  S. Rutherford Surveillance scanning in lymphoma. , 2019, Clinical advances in hematology & oncology : H&O.

[13]  J. Radford,et al.  Positron Emission Tomography Score Has Greater Prognostic Significance Than Pretreatment Risk Stratification in Early-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma in the UK RAPID Study. , 2019, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  Sally F Barrington,et al.  Time to Prepare for Risk Adaptation in Lymphoma by Standardizing Measurement of Metabolic Tumor Burden , 2019, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  S. Horwitz,et al.  Baseline and interim functional imaging with PET effectively risk stratifies patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma. , 2019, Blood advances.

[16]  L. Domachevsky,et al.  FDG PET/CT as a diagnostic and prognostic tool for the evaluation of marginal zone lymphoma , 2018, Hematological oncology.

[17]  W. Hiddemann,et al.  Prognostic value of end-of-induction PET response after first-line immunochemotherapy for follicular lymphoma (GALLIUM): secondary analysis of a randomised, phase 3 trial. , 2018, The Lancet. Oncology.

[18]  A. Drzezga,et al.  Value of bone marrow biopsy in Hodgkin lymphoma patients staged by FDG PET: results from the German Hodgkin Study Group trials HD16, HD17, and HD18 , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[19]  A. Rossi,et al.  Early Chemotherapy Intensification With Escalated BEACOPP in Patients With Advanced-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma With a Positive Interim Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Scan After Two ABVD Cycles: Long-Term Results of the GITIL/FIL HD 0607 Trial. , 2018, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  John O. Prior,et al.  Predictive Value of PET Response Combined with Baseline Metabolic Tumor Volume in Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma Patients , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  S. Leprêtre,et al.  Predictive value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in adults with T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma: post hoc analysis of results from the GRAALL-LYSA LLO3 trial , 2017, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[22]  J. Leonard,et al.  Bone marrow biopsies do not impact response assessment for follicular lymphoma patients treated on clinical trials , 2017, British journal of haematology.

[23]  Sally F Barrington,et al.  FDG PET for therapy monitoring in Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas , 2017, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[24]  W. Wilson,et al.  International Working Group consensus response evaluation criteria in lymphoma (RECIL 2017) , 2017, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[25]  M. Lodge Repeatability of SUV in Oncologic 18F-FDG PET , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[26]  R. Advani,et al.  Refinement of the Lugano Classification lymphoma response criteria in the era of immunomodulatory therapy. , 2016, Blood.

[27]  F. d'Amore,et al.  Adapted Treatment Guided by Interim PET-CT Scan in Advanced Hodgkin's Lymphoma. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  R. Gascoyne,et al.  The value of routine bone marrow biopsy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma staged with PET/CT: a Danish-Canadian study. , 2016, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[29]  P. Gaulard,et al.  Prognostic value of baseline total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV0) measured on FDG-PET/CT in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). , 2016, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[30]  E. Seifried,et al.  Spleen Size Is Significantly Influenced by Body Height and Sex: Establishment of Normal Values for Spleen Size at US with a Cohort of 1200 Healthy Individuals. , 2016, Radiology.

[31]  C. Thompson,et al.  PET-CT in Staging, Response Evaluation, and Surveillance of Lymphoma , 2016, Current Treatment Options in Oncology.

[32]  F. d'Amore,et al.  PET-CT for staging and early response: results from the Response-Adapted Therapy in Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma study. , 2016, Blood.

[33]  J. Pérez-Simón,et al.  Role of 18F‐FDG‐PET/CT in the management of marginal zone B cell lymphoma , 2015, Hematological oncology.

[34]  J. Pérez-Simón,et al.  Role of 18F‐FDG‐PET/CT in the management of Burkitt lymphoma , 2015, European journal of haematology.

[35]  J. Cerhan,et al.  Utility of routine post-therapy surveillance imaging in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[36]  R. Fisher,et al.  Role of imaging in the staging and response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the International Conference on Malignant Lymphomas Imaging Working Group. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[37]  Bruce D Cheson,et al.  Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[38]  M. Federico,et al.  The use of FDG-PET in the initial staging of 142 patients with follicular lymphoma: a retrospective study from the FOLL05 randomized trial of the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi. , 2013, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[39]  R. Hicks,et al.  Limited role for surveillance PET–CT scanning in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in complete metabolic remission following primary therapy , 2013, British Journal of Cancer.

[40]  G. Salles,et al.  Impact of [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Response Evaluation in Patients With High–Tumor Burden Follicular Lymphoma Treated With Immunochemotherapy: A Prospective Study From the Groupe d’Etudes des Lymphomes de l’Adulte and GOELAMS , 2012 .

[41]  G. Salles,et al.  Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) after induction therapy is highly predictive of patient outcome in follicular lymphoma: analysis of PET-CT in a subset of PRIMA trial participants. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[42]  M. Juweid,et al.  Improvement of Early 18F-FDG PET Interpretation in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Importance of the Reference Background , 2010, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[43]  M. Gönen,et al.  Characterization of T-cell lymphomas by FDG PET/CT. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[44]  M. Mohty,et al.  Prognostic impact of 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in untreated mantle cell lymphoma: a retrospective study from the GOELAMS group , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[45]  Ora Israel,et al.  18F-FDG Avidity in Lymphoma Readdressed: A Study of 766 Patients , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[46]  R. Halkar,et al.  Spectrum of FDG PET/CT Findings in Burkitt Lymphoma , 2009, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[47]  Sigrid Stroobants,et al.  Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[48]  P. Zinzani,et al.  Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Assessment After Immunochemotherapy and Irradiation Using the Lugano Classification Criteria in the IELSG-26 Study of Primary Mediastinal B-Cell Lymphoma. , 2017, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.