Emergent structures and dynamics of cell colonies by contact inhibition of locomotion

Significance The regular distribution of mesenchymal cells, the formation of epithelial monolayers, or their collapse into spheroidal tumors illustrates the broad range of possible organizations of cells in tissues. Unveiling a physical picture of their emergence and dynamics is of critical importance to understand tissue morphogenesis or cancer progression. Although the role of cell–substrate and cell–cell adhesion in the organization of cell colonies has been widely studied, the impact of the cell-type–specific contact inhibition of locomotion (CIL) remains unclear. Here, we include this interaction in simulations of active particles and find a number of structures and collective dynamics that recapitulate existing tissue phenotypes. We give analytical predictions for the epithelial–mesenchymal transition and the formation of 3D aggregates as a function of cell–cell adhesion and CIL strengths. Thus, our findings shed light on the physical mechanisms underlying multicellular organization. Cells in tissues can organize into a broad spectrum of structures according to their function. Drastic changes of organization, such as epithelial–mesenchymal transitions or the formation of spheroidal aggregates, are often associated either to tissue morphogenesis or to cancer progression. Here, we study the organization of cell colonies by means of simulations of self-propelled particles with generic cell-like interactions. The interplay between cell softness, cell–cell adhesion, and contact inhibition of locomotion (CIL) yields structures and collective dynamics observed in several existing tissue phenotypes. These include regular distributions of cells, dynamic cell clusters, gel-like networks, collectively migrating monolayers, and 3D aggregates. We give analytical predictions for transitions between noncohesive, cohesive, and 3D cell arrangements. We explicitly show how CIL yields an effective repulsion that promotes cell dispersal, thereby hindering the formation of cohesive tissues. Yet, in continuous monolayers, CIL leads to collective cell motion, ensures tensile intercellular stresses, and opposes cell extrusion. Thus, our work highlights the prominent role of CIL in determining the emergent structures and dynamics of cell colonies.

[1]  Anh Phuong Le,et al.  Regulation of epithelial cell organization by tuning cell-substrate adhesion. , 2015, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[2]  Françoise Brochard-Wyart,et al.  Spreading dynamics and wetting transition of cellular aggregates , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  G. Wayne Brodland,et al.  Forces driving epithelial wound healing , 2014, Nature Physics.

[4]  W. Rappel,et al.  Alignment of cellular motility forces with tissue flow as a mechanism for efficient wound healing , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Françoise Brochard-Wyart,et al.  Wetting transitions of cellular aggregates induced by substrate rigidity , 2012 .

[6]  Roberto Mayor,et al.  Contact Inhibition of Locomotion in vivo controls neural crest directional migration , 2008, Nature.

[7]  P. Friedl,et al.  Collective cell migration in morphogenesis, regeneration and cancer , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[8]  M. Abercrombie,et al.  Interference microscope studies of cell contacts in tissue culture. , 1958, Experimental cell research.

[9]  Bianca M. Mladek,et al.  Erratum: Formation of Polymorphic Cluster Phases for a Class of Models of Purely Repulsive Soft Spheres [Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 045701 (2006)] , 2006 .

[10]  R. Huang,et al.  Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transitions in Development and Disease , 2009, Cell.

[11]  Françoise Brochard-Wyart,et al.  Soft Matter Models of Developing Tissues and Tumors , 2012, Science.

[12]  F. Brochard-Wyart,et al.  Dewetting of cellular monolayers , 2012, The European physical journal. E, Soft matter.

[13]  Andrew J. Ewald,et al.  A collective route to metastasis: Seeding by tumor cell clusters , 2016, Science.

[14]  M. Nieto Epithelial Plasticity: A Common Theme in Embryonic and Cancer Cells , 2013, Science.

[15]  X. Trepat,et al.  P-cadherin promotes collective cell migration via a Cdc42-mediated increase in mechanical forces , 2016, The Journal of cell biology.

[16]  J. Kohn,et al.  Tissue spreading on implantable substrates is a competitive outcome of cell–cell vs. cell–substratum adhesivity , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  M. Murrell,et al.  How cells flow in the spreading of cellular aggregates , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Ravi A. Desai,et al.  Contact inhibition of locomotion probabilities drive solitary versus collective cell migration , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[19]  Tamás Vicsek,et al.  Collective motion of cells: from experiments to models. , 2014, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[20]  Xavier Trepat,et al.  Active Tensile Modulus of an Epithelial Monolayer. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[21]  Hugues Chaté,et al.  Self-propelled particle model for cell-sorting phenomena. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[22]  Vincent Hakim,et al.  Collective Cell Motion in an Epithelial Sheet Can Be Quantitatively Described by a Stochastic Interacting Particle Model , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[23]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Phase transition in the collective migration of tissue cells: experiment and model. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[24]  M. Miodownik,et al.  Inter-Cellular Forces Orchestrate Contact Inhibition of Locomotion , 2015, Cell.

[25]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Control of cell-cell forces and collective cell dynamics by the intercellular adhesome , 2015, Nature Cell Biology.

[26]  Wouter-Jan Rappel,et al.  Contact inhibition of locomotion determines cell–cell and cell–substrate forces in tissues , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  M. Gardel,et al.  Protrusive activity guides changes in cell-cell tension during epithelial cell scattering. , 2014, Biophysical journal.

[28]  Vincent Hakim,et al.  Modeling the finger instability in an expanding cell monolayer. , 2015, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[29]  M. Abercrombie,et al.  Observations on the social behaviour of cells in tissue culture. II. Monolayering of fibroblasts. , 1954, Experimental cell research.

[30]  John Waldron,et al.  The Langevin Equation , 2004 .

[31]  R. Mayor,et al.  Molecular basis of contact inhibition of locomotion , 2015, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[32]  Iain D. Couzin,et al.  Directional Collective Cell Migration Emerges as a Property of Cell Interactions , 2014, PloS one.

[33]  Michael F Hagan,et al.  Structure and dynamics of a phase-separating active colloidal fluid. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[34]  E. Rosten,et al.  Emergence of embryonic pattern through contact inhibition of locomotion , 2012, Development.

[35]  L. Berthier,et al.  Clustering and heterogeneous dynamics in a kinetic Monte Carlo model of self-propelled hard disks. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[36]  O. Marín,et al.  Contact Repulsion Controls the Dispersion and Final Distribution of Cajal-Retzius Cells , 2013, Neuron.

[37]  Gerhard Kahl,et al.  Formation of polymorphic cluster phases for a class of models of purely repulsive soft spheres. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[38]  Hannah G. Yevick,et al.  Emergence of collective modes and tri-dimensional structures from epithelial confinement , 2014, Nature Communications.

[39]  Silke Henkes,et al.  Active jamming: self-propelled soft particles at high density. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[40]  C. N. Likos,et al.  Diffusion and relaxation dynamics in cluster crystals. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[41]  R. Mayor,et al.  Collective cell migration of epithelial and mesenchymal cells , 2013, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[42]  Michael F Hagan,et al.  Reentrant phase behavior in active colloids with attraction. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[43]  M Cristina Marchetti,et al.  Athermal phase separation of self-propelled particles with no alignment. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[44]  R. Mayor,et al.  Modelling collective cell migration of neural crest. , 2016, Current opinion in cell biology.

[45]  A. Bray Theory of phase-ordering kinetics , 1994, cond-mat/9501089.

[46]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Cell crawling mediates collective cell migration to close undamaged epithelial gaps , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  P. Silberzan,et al.  Border forces and friction control epithelial closure dynamics. , 2014, Biophysical journal.

[48]  J. Joanny,et al.  Physics of active jamming during collective cellular motion in a monolayer , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  Brian A. Camley,et al.  Emergent Collective Chemotaxis without Single-Cell Gradient Sensing. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[50]  P. Friedl,et al.  Tumour-cell invasion and migration: diversity and escape mechanisms , 2003, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[51]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Anomalous segregation dynamics of self-propelled particles , 2014, New journal of physics.

[52]  Silke Henkes,et al.  Freezing and phase separation of self-propelled disks. , 2013, Soft matter.

[53]  Shereen R Kadir,et al.  Microtubule remodelling is required for the front–rear polarity switch during contact inhibition of locomotion , 2011, Journal of Cell Science.

[54]  M. Abercrombie,et al.  Contact inhibition and malignancy , 1979, Nature.