Information control and the power and politics of marketing

Abstract The key environmental boundary-spanning role of marketing departments in organizations has been recognized descriptively by a number of marketing analysts. However, relatively little has been considered of the implications of this information-processing role for the political structure of the organization, or for the power of the marketing department. Empirical evidence concerned with the relationship between the control of information access and the power of the marketing department is presented in this paper. These empirical data are drawn from a sample of 140 medium- and large-sized manufacturing companies in the United Kingdom. Key findings relate to the restriction of marketing information flow by marketing departments in the sample companies. This phenomenon is related positively to the perceived/participative power of marketing departments and to corporate politicization, but negatively to the access gained by marketing departments to corporate information sources, and also negatively to the positional power of the marketing department. These last relationships suggest a possible substitution effect between formal power and the politics of information restriction by marketing departments. These findings lead to the identification of both a research agenda for the study of information management in marketing and a number of practical implications for marketing management.

[1]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory , 1967 .

[2]  K. Weick The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[3]  G. Zaltman,et al.  Factors Affecting the Use of Market Research Information: A Path Analysis , 1982 .

[4]  Jay R. Galbraith Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[5]  Robert E. Spekman Influence and Information: An Exploratory Investigation of the Boundary Role Person's Basis of Power , 1979 .

[6]  J. Child Organization: A Guide to Problems and Practice , 1977 .

[7]  N. Piercy The role and function of the chief marketing executive and the marketing department: A study of medium‐sized companies in the UK , 1986 .

[8]  P. F. Anderson Marketing, Strategic Planning and the Theory of the Firm , 1982 .

[9]  Robert W. Ruekert,et al.  The Organization of Marketing Activities: A Contingency Theory of Structure and Performance , 1985 .

[10]  Lyman W. Porter,et al.  Organizational Politics , 1979 .

[11]  Gerald Zaltman,et al.  A Comparison of Factors Affecting Researcher and Manager Perceptions of Market Research Use , 1984 .

[12]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  The External Control of Organizations. , 1978 .

[13]  J. Pennings,et al.  A Strategic Contingencies' Theory of Intraorganizational Power , 1971 .

[14]  F. Nicosia,et al.  Marketing management, its environment, and information processing: a problem of organizational design , 1979 .

[15]  A. Pettigrew The politics of organizational decision-making , 1973 .

[16]  M. Deutsch,et al.  Research Methods in Social Relations , 1952 .

[17]  N. Piercy The Marketing Budgeting Process: Marketing Management Implications , 1987 .

[18]  Marketing Organisation: An Analysis of Information Processing, Power and Politics , 1985 .

[19]  L. Cronbach Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[20]  G. John,et al.  Effects of Organizational Structure of Marketing Planning on Credibility and Utilization of Plan Output , 1984 .

[21]  David B. Jemison THE IMPORTANCE OF BOUNDARY SPANNING ROLES IN STRATEGIC DECISION‐MAKING [I] , 1984 .

[22]  Marshall W. Meyer,et al.  Power in Organizations. , 1982 .