Upper mantle rheology from GRACE and GPS postseismic deformation after the 2004 Sumatra‐Andaman earthquake

Mantle rheology is one of the essential, yet least understood, material properties of our planet, controlling the dynamic processes inside the Earth's mantle and the Earth's response to various forces. With the advent of GRACE satellite gravity, measurements of mass displacements associated with many processes are now available. In the case of mass displacements related to postseismic deformation, these data may provide new constraints on the mantle rheology. We consider the postseismic deformation due to the Mw = 9.2 Sumatra 26 December 2004 and Mw = 8.7 Nias 28 March 2005 earthquakes. Applying wavelet analyses to enhance those local signals in the GRACE time varying geoids up to September 2007, we detect a clear postseismic gravity signal. We supplement these gravity variations with GPS measurements of postseismic crustal displacements to constrain postseismic relaxation processes throughout the upper mantle. The observed GPS displacements and gravity variations are well explained by a model of viscoelastic relaxation plus a small amount of afterslip at the downdip extension of the coseismically ruptured fault planes. Our model uses a 60 km thick elastic layer above a viscoelastic asthenosphere with Burgers body rheology. The mantle below depth 220 km has a Maxwell rheology. Assuming a low transient viscosity in the 60–220 km depth range, the GRACE data are best explained by a constant steady state viscosity throughout the ductile portion of the upper mantle (e.g., 60–660 km). This suggests that the localization of relatively low viscosity in the asthenosphere is chiefly in the transient viscosity rather than the steady state viscosity. We find a 8.1018 Pa s mantle viscosity in the 220–660 km depth range. This may indicate a transient response of the upper mantle to the high amount of stress released by the earthquakes. To fit the remaining misfit to the GRACE data, larger at the smaller spatial scales, cumulative afterslip of about 75 cm at depth should be added over the period spanned by the GRACE models. It produces only small crustal displacements. Our results confirm that satellite gravity data are an essential complement to ground geodetic and geophysical networks in order to understand the seismic cycle and the Earth's inner structure.

[1]  A. Paulson,et al.  On the resolution of radial viscosity structure in modelling long‐wavelength postglacial rebound data , 2009 .

[2]  Frederik J. Simons,et al.  Efficient analysis and representation of geophysical processes using localized spherical basis functions , 2009, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[3]  G. Blewitt,et al.  Geodetic constraints on contemporary deformation in the northern Walker Lane: 3. Central Nevada seismic belt postseismic relaxation , 2009 .

[4]  Richard Biancale,et al.  Separation of coseismic and postseismic gravity changes for the 2004 Sumatra–Andaman earthquake from 4.6 yr of GRACE observations and modelling of the coseismic change by normal-modes summation , 2009 .

[5]  E. Boschi,et al.  Postseismic signature of the 2004 Sumatra earthquake on low-degree gravity harmonics , 2008 .

[6]  Chen Ji,et al.  Partial rupture of a locked patch of the Sumatra megathrust during the 2007 earthquake sequence , 2008, Nature.

[7]  Chen Ji,et al.  Implications of postseismic gravity change following the great 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake from the regional harmonic analysis of GRACE intersatellite tracking data , 2008 .

[8]  M. Camp,et al.  Retrieving earthquake signature in grace gravity solutions , 2008 .

[9]  Georg Dresen,et al.  Rheology of the Lower Crust and Upper Mantle: Evidence from Rock Mechanics, Geodesy, and Field Observations , 2008 .

[10]  F. Pollitz,et al.  Effect of 3-D viscoelastic structure on post-seismic relaxation from the 2004 M= 9.2 Sumatra earthquake , 2008 .

[11]  Frederik J. Simons,et al.  Spatiospectral localization of global geopotential fields from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) reveals the coseismic gravity change owing to the 2004 Sumatra‐Andaman earthquake , 2008 .

[12]  F. Pollitz,et al.  Temporal evolution of continental lithospheric strength in actively deforming regions , 2008 .

[13]  Matthias Holschneider,et al.  Coseismic and post-seismic signatures of the Sumatra 2004 December and 2005 March earthquakes in GRACE satellite gravity , 2007 .

[14]  R. Bilham,et al.  Postseismic deformation of the Andaman Islands following the 26 December, 2004 Great Sumatra–Andaman earthquake , 2007 .

[15]  Z. Martinec,et al.  Glacial-isostatic Adjustment and the Viscosity Structure Underlying the Vatnajökull Ice Cap, Iceland , 2007 .

[16]  K. Heki,et al.  Slow postseismic recovery of geoid depression formed by the 2004 Sumatra‐Andaman Earthquake by mantle water diffusion , 2007 .

[17]  Jean-Charles Marty,et al.  Temporal gravity field models inferred from GRACE data , 2007 .

[18]  Fred F. Pollitz,et al.  Coseismic Slip Distributions of the 26 December 2004 Sumatra–Andaman and 28 March 2005 Nias Earthquakes from gps Static Offsets , 2007 .

[19]  Chen Ji,et al.  Coseismic Slip and Afterslip of the Great Mw 9.15 Sumatra–Andaman Earthquake of 2004 , 2007 .

[20]  R. Bürgmann,et al.  Stress-dependent power-law flow in the upper mantle following the 2002 Denali, Alaska, earthquake , 2006 .

[21]  Scott B. Luthcke,et al.  FAST TRACK PAPER: Tide model errors and GRACE gravimetry: towards a more realistic assessment , 2006 .

[22]  F. Pollitz,et al.  Post-seismic relaxation following the great 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake on a compressible self-gravitating Earth , 2006 .

[23]  M. Holschneider,et al.  New insights on intraplate volcanism in French Polynesia from wavelet analysis of GRACE, CHAMP, and sea surface data , 2006 .

[24]  Pieter Visser,et al.  Accuracy assessment of the monthly GRACE geoids based upon a simulation , 2006 .

[25]  Chen Ji,et al.  Crustal Dilatation Observed by GRACE After the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake , 2006, Science.

[26]  F. Pollitz,et al.  Stress changes along the Sunda trench following the 26 December 2004 Sumatra‐Andaman and 28 March 2005 Nias earthquakes , 2006 .

[27]  Hiroshi Takiguchi,et al.  Crustal deformations associated with the great Sumatra-Andaman earthquake deduced from continuous GPS observation , 2005 .

[28]  Chalermchon Satirapod,et al.  Insight into the 2004 Sumatra–Andaman earthquake from GPS measurements in southeast Asia , 2005, Nature.

[29]  F. Pollitz,et al.  The Size and Duration of the Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake from Far-Field Static Offsets , 2005, Science.

[30]  John McCloskey,et al.  Seismology: Earthquake risk on the Sunda trench , 2005, Nature.

[31]  Chen Ji,et al.  Rupture Process of the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake , 2005, Science.

[32]  H. Kanamori,et al.  The Great Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake of 26 December 2004 , 2005, Science.

[33]  J. Curray,et al.  Tectonics and history of the Andaman Sea region , 2005 .

[34]  J. Tromp,et al.  The Great Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake , 2005 .

[35]  Isabelle Panet,et al.  Can tectonic processes be recovered from new gravity satellite data , 2004 .

[36]  Pierre Henry,et al.  The Sumatra subduction zone: A case for a locked fault zone extending into the mantle , 2004 .

[37]  Roland Bürgmann,et al.  Evidence of power-law flow in the Mojave desert mantle , 2004, Nature.

[38]  Wenke Sun,et al.  Coseismic deformations detectable by satellite gravity missions: A case study of Alaska (1964, 2002) and Hokkaido (2003) earthquakes in the spectral domain , 2004 .

[39]  S. Acinas,et al.  Evidence of power-law flow in the Mojave desert mantle , 2004 .

[40]  F. Pollitz.  Transient Rheology of the uppermost mantle beneath the Mojave Desert , 2003 .

[41]  Mioara Mandea,et al.  From global to regional analysis of the magnetic field on the sphere using wavelet frames , 2003 .

[42]  Zuheir Altamimi,et al.  ITRF2000: A new release of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame for earth science applications , 2002 .

[43]  C. Demets,et al.  Homogeneous vs heterogeneous subduction zone models: Coseismic and postseismic deformation , 2001 .

[44]  F. Pollitz,et al.  Mantle Flow Beneath a Continental Strike-Slip Fault: Postseismic Deformation After the 1999 Hector Mine Earthquake , 2001, Science.

[45]  C. Deplus.  Indian Ocean Actively Deforms , 2001, Science.

[46]  B. Chao,et al.  The Gravitational Signature of Earthquakes , 2001 .

[47]  F. Bryan,et al.  Time variability of the Earth's gravity field: Hydrological and oceanic effects and their possible detection using GRACE , 1998 .

[48]  F. Pollitz,et al.  Viscosity of oceanic asthenosphere inferred from remote triggering of earthquakes , 1998, Science.

[49]  Olafur Gudmundsson,et al.  A regionalized upper mantle (RUM) seismic model , 1998 .

[50]  Jacques Octave Dubois,et al.  Direct evidence of active deformation in the eastern Indian oceanic plate , 1998 .

[51]  Fred F. Pollitz,et al.  Gravitational viscoelastic postseismic relaxation on a layered spherical Earth , 1997 .

[52]  Sinisa Pajevic,et al.  Wavelets: An analysis tool , 1997 .

[53]  Fred F. Pollitz,et al.  Coseismic Deformation From Earthquake Faulting On A Layered Spherical Earth , 1996 .

[54]  Walter H. F. Smith,et al.  New version of the generic mapping tools , 1995 .

[55]  S. King.  The viscosity structure of the mantle , 1995 .

[56]  Patrick Wu,et al.  Rheology of the Upper Mantle: A Synthesis , 1993, Science.

[57]  M. Diament,et al.  Mentawai fault zone off Sumatra: A new key to the geodynamics of western Indonesia , 1992 .

[58]  Bradford H. Hager,et al.  Mantle Viscosity: A Comparison of Models from Postglacial Rebound and from the Geoid, Plate Driving Forces, and Advected Heat Flux , 1991 .

[59]  K. Lambeck,et al.  Late Pleistocene and Holocene sea‐level change in the Australian region and mantle rheology , 1989 .

[60]  K. Lambeck,et al.  Glacial rebound and relative sea-level variations: a new appraisal , 1987 .

[61]  Giorgio Ranalli,et al.  Rheology of the earth , 1987 .

[62]  D. L. Anderson,et al.  Preliminary reference earth model , 1981 .

[63]  D. Anderson,et al.  A model of dislocation-controlled rheology for the mantle , 1981, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[64]  M. F. Ashby,et al.  On the rheology of the upper mantle , 1973 .