Auditing HIV Testing Rates across Europe: Results from the HIDES 2 Study

European guidelines recommend the routine offer of an HIV test in patients with a number of AIDS-defining and non-AIDS conditions believed to share an association with HIV; so called indicator conditions (IC). Adherence with this guidance across Europe is not known. We audited HIV testing behaviour in patients accessing care for a number of ICs. Participating centres reviewed the case notes of either 100 patients or of all consecutive patients in one year, presenting for each of the following ICs: tuberculosis, non-Hodgkins lymphoma, anal and cervical cancer, hepatitis B and C and oesophageal candidiasis. Observed HIV-positive rates were applied by region and IC to estimate the number of HIV diagnoses potentially missed. Outcomes examined were: HIV test rate (% of total patients with IC), HIV test accepted (% of tests performed/% of tests offered) and new HIV diagnosis rate (%). There were 49 audits from 23 centres, representing 7037 patients. The median test rate across audits was 72% (IQR 32–97), lowest in Northern Europe (median 44%, IQR 22–68%) and highest in Eastern Europe (median 99%, IQR 86–100). Uptake of testing was close to 100% in all regions. The median HIV+ rate was 0.9% (IQR 0.0–4.9), with 29 audits (60.4%) having an HIV+ rate >0.1%. After adjustment, there were no differences between regions of Europe in the proportion with >0.1% testing positive (global p = 0.14). A total of 113 patients tested HIV+. Applying the observed rates of testing HIV+ within individual ICs and regions to all persons presenting with an IC suggested that 105 diagnoses were potentially missed. Testing rates in well-established HIV ICs remained low across Europe, despite high prevalence rates, reflecting missed opportunities for earlier HIV diagnosis and care. Significant numbers may have had an opportunity for HIV diagnosis if all persons included in IC audits had been tested.

[1]  R. Walensky,et al.  Routine HIV Screening in France: Clinical Impact and Cost-Effectiveness , 2010, PloS one.

[2]  Y. Yazdanpanah,et al.  Missed opportunities for HIV testing in newly-HIV-diagnosed patients, a cross sectional study , 2013, BMC Infectious Diseases.

[3]  A. Mocroft,et al.  Late presentation of HIV infection: a consensus definition , 2011, HIV medicine.

[4]  G. Pedersen,et al.  Late presenters, repeated testing, and missed opportunities in a Danish nationwide HIV cohort , 2012, Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases.

[5]  A. Mocroft,et al.  Regional Changes Over Time in Initial Virologic Response Rates to Combination Antiretroviral Therapy Across Europe , 2006, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[6]  M. Leszczyszyn‐Pynka,et al.  [Late AIDS diagnosis in patients hospitalized in Clinic of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology PAM in years 2003-2007]. , 2009, Przeglad epidemiologiczny.

[7]  Anne M Johnson,et al.  Risk Factors and Outcomes for Late Presentation for HIV-Positive Persons in Europe: Results from the Collaboration of Observational HIV Epidemiological Research Europe Study (COHERE) , 2013, PLoS medicine.

[8]  Andrew N. Phillips,et al.  Projected life expectancy of people with HIV according to timing of diagnosis , 2012, AIDS.

[9]  W. Henrich,et al.  Testing for HIV during pregnancy: 5 years after changing German pregnancy guidelines , 2013, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[10]  J. Arnold,et al.  Antenatal screening and prevalence of infection: surveillance in London, 2000-2007. , 2009, Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin.

[11]  Milton C Weinstein,et al.  Expanded screening for HIV in the United States--an analysis of cost-effectiveness. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  J. Casabona,et al.  HIV testing : increasing uptake and effectiveness in the European Union Evidence synthesis for Guidance on HIV testing , 2010 .

[13]  Milton C Weinstein,et al.  Cost-effectiveness implications of the timing of antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected adults. , 2002, Archives of internal medicine.

[14]  E. O. D. Op de Coul,et al.  Antenatal screening for HIV, hepatitis B and syphilis in the Netherlands is effective , 2011, BMC infectious diseases.

[15]  A. Nardone,et al.  HIV Testing in Non-Traditional Settings – The HINTS Study: A Multi-Centre Observational Study of Feasibility and Acceptability , 2012, PloS one.

[16]  Douglas K Owens,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of screening for HIV in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Stefan Esser,et al.  Feasibility and Effectiveness of Indicator Condition-Guided Testing for HIV: Results from HIDES I (HIV Indicator Diseases across Europe Study) , 2013, PloS one.