A new approach to design an efficient micropost array for enhanced direct-current insulator-based dielectrophoretic trapping

AbstractDirect-current insulator-based dielectrophoresis (DC-iDEP) is a well-known technique that benefits from the electric field gradients generated by an array of insulating posts to separate or trap biological particles. The aim of this study is to provide a first geometrical relationship of the post array that independent of the particles and/or medium, maximizes the trapping. A novel figure of merit is proposed to maximize the particle trapping in the post array while minimizing the required voltage, with a similar footprint and channel thickness. Different post array models with the variation of transversal distance (10 to 60 μm), longitudinal distance (10 to 80 μm), and post radius (10 to 150 μm) were analyzed using COMSOL Multiphysics finite element software. The obtained results indicated that a post radius of 40 μm larger than the transversal distance between posts could enhance the trapping condition between 56 % (for a transversal distance of 10 μm) and 341 % (for a transversal distance of 60 μm). For the validation of the numerical results, several microchannels with embedded post arrays were manufactured in polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and the particle trapping patterns of 6-μm-diameter polystyrene particles were measured experimentally. The experiments confirm the same trends as pointed out by the numerical analysis. The results show that this new figure of merit and geometrical relationship can be used to reduce the required electric field to achieve effective particle trapping and, therefore, avoid the negative effects of Joule heating in cells or viable particles. The main advantage of these results is that they depend only on the geometry of the micropost array and are valid for trapping different particles suspended in different media. Graphical abstractAnalysis to maximize the particle trapping in the post array while minimizing the required voltage. I. Microfluidic channel design and experimental setup II. Numerical and experimental results. III. Maximum trapping value

[1]  J. Shim,et al.  Effect of array and shape of insulating posts on proteins focusing by direct current dielectrophoresis , 2014 .

[2]  Karuna S. Koppula,et al.  Effect of insulating posts geometry on particle manipulation in insulator based dielectrophoretic devices. , 2014, Journal of chromatography. A.

[3]  George Whitesides.  The lab finally comes to the chip! , 2014, Lab on a chip.

[4]  Mehdi Mohammadi,et al.  Electroosmotic micropump for lab‐on‐a‐chip biomedical applications , 2016 .

[5]  S. Kalams,et al.  DC-Dielectrophoretic separation of biological cells by size , 2008, Biomedical microdevices.

[6]  P. Gascoyne,et al.  Particle separation by dielectrophoresis , 2002, Electrophoresis.

[7]  J. Casals-Terré,et al.  Microfluidic point-of-care blood panel based on a novel technique: Reversible electroosmotic flow. , 2015, Biomicrofluidics.

[8]  P. Sajeesh,et al.  Particle separation and sorting in microfluidic devices: a review , 2014 .

[9]  S. J. R. Staton,et al.  Blood cell capture in a sawtooth dielectrophoretic microchannel , 2011, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[10]  Marleen Mescher,et al.  Influence of Conductivity and Dielectric Constant of Water–Dioxane Mixtures on the Electrical Response of SiNW-Based FETs , 2014, Sensors.

[11]  Cullen R Buie,et al.  High sensitivity three-dimensional insulator-based dielectrophoresis. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[12]  Prashanta Dutta,et al.  Dielectrophoretic separation of bioparticles in microdevices: A review , 2014, Electrophoresis.

[13]  A. Ros,et al.  Immunoglobulin G and bovine serum albumin streaming dielectrophoresis in a microfluidic device , 2011, Electrophoresis.

[14]  Soumya K. Srivastava,et al.  A continuous DC-insulator dielectrophoretic sorter of microparticles. , 2011, Journal of chromatography. A.

[15]  Thomas Laurell,et al.  Continuous separation of cells and particles in microfluidic systems. , 2010, Chemical Society reviews.

[16]  D. S. Clague,et al.  Erratum: Dielectrophoretic manipulation of macromolecules: The electric field [Phys. Rev. E64, 026605 (2001)] , 2005 .

[17]  Ralf Eichhorn,et al.  Electrodeless dielectrophoresis for bioanalysis: Theory, devices and applications , 2011, Electrophoresis.

[18]  E. Cummings,et al.  Dielectrophoretic concentration and separation of live and dead bacteria in an array of insulators. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[19]  Myung-Suk Chun,et al.  Improvement of microchannel geometry subject to electrokinesis and dielectrophoresis using numerical simulations , 2008 .

[20]  Soumya K. Srivastava,et al.  Direct current insulator‐based dielectrophoretic characterization of erythrocytes: ABO‐Rh human blood typing , 2011, Electrophoresis.

[21]  Kwan Hyoung Kang,et al.  Effects of dc-dielectrophoretic force on particle trajectories in microchannels , 2006 .

[22]  D S Clague,et al.  Dielectrophoretic manipulation of macromolecules: the electric field. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[23]  Jasmina Casals-Terré,et al.  Hydrodynamic and direct-current insulator-based dielectrophoresis (H-DC-iDEP) microfluidic blood plasma separation , 2015, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[24]  Dongqing Li,et al.  DC-dielectrophoretic separation of microparticles using an oil droplet obstacle. , 2006, Lab on a chip.

[25]  Soumya K. Srivastava,et al.  DC insulator dielectrophoretic applications in microdevice technology: a review , 2011, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[26]  A. Singh,et al.  Dielectrophoresis in microchips containing arrays of insulating posts: theoretical and experimental results. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[27]  S. Martínez-Chapa,et al.  Prediction of trapping zones in an insulator-based dielectrophoretic device. , 2009, Lab on a chip.

[28]  Yuejun Kang,et al.  Continuous particle separation by size via AC‐dielectrophoresis using a lab‐on‐a‐chip device with 3‐D electrodes , 2009, Electrophoresis.

[29]  H. Morgan,et al.  The electrokinetic properties of latex particles: comparison of electrophoresis and dielectrophoresis. , 2005, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[30]  R. Davalos,et al.  An insulator-based (electrodeless) dielectrophoretic concentrator for microbes in water. , 2005, Journal of microbiological methods.

[31]  Yuejun Kang,et al.  Continuous separation of microparticles by size with Direct current‐dielectrophoresis , 2006, Electrophoresis.

[32]  T. Taylor,et al.  Dielectrophoretic mobility determination in DC insulator‐based dielectrophoresis , 2011, Electrophoresis.

[33]  B. Lapizco-Encinas,et al.  Experimental and theoretical study of dielectrophoretic particle trapping in arrays of insulating structures: Effect of particle size and shape , 2015, Electrophoresis.

[34]  Haibo Huang,et al.  Dielectrophoresis for Bioparticle Manipulation , 2014, International journal of molecular sciences.

[35]  Yoon‐Kyoung Cho,et al.  Bacteria concentration using a membrane type insulator‐based dielectrophoresis in a plastic chip , 2009, Electrophoresis.

[36]  Guoqing Hu,et al.  DC dielectrophoretic focusing of particles in a serpentine microchannel , 2009 .