Metasynthesis: M-Space, M-Interaction, and M-Computing for Open Complex Giant Systems

The studies of complex systems have been recognized as one of the greatest challenges for current and future science and technology. Open complex giant systems (OCGSs) are a family of specially complex systems with system complexities such as openness, human involvement, societal characteristic, and intelligence emergence. They greatly challenge multiple disciplines such as system sciences, system engineering, cognitive sciences, information systems, artificial intelligence, and computer sciences. As a result, traditional problem-solving methodologies can help deal with them but are far from a mature solution methodology. The theory of qualitative-to-quantitative metasynthesis has been proposed as a breakthrough and effective methodology for the understanding and problem solving of OCGSs. In this paper, we propose the concepts of M-Interaction, M-Space, and M-Computing which are three key components for studying OCGS and building problem-solving systems. M-Interaction forms the main problem-solving mechanism of qualitative-to-quantitative metasynthesis; M-Space is the OCGS problem-solving system embedded with M-Interactions, while M-Computing consists of engineering approaches to the analysis, design, and implementation of M-Space and M-Interaction. We discuss the theoretical framework, problem-solving process, social cognitive evolution, intelligence emergence, and pitfalls of certain types of cognitions in developing M-Space and M-Interaction from the perspectives of cognitive sciences and social cognitive interaction. These can help one understand complex systems and develop effective problem-solving methodologies.

[1]  John R. Koza,et al.  Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. , 1995, Artificial Life.

[2]  Peter Wegner,et al.  Why interaction is more powerful than algorithms , 1997, CACM.

[3]  Dai Ruwei,et al.  A new discipline of science — The study of open complex giant system and its methodology , 1993 .

[4]  戴汝为.  《社会智能科学（SCIENCE OF SOCIAL INTELLIGENCE）》 , 2006 .

[5]  J. Urry.  Complexity , 2006, Interpreting Art.

[6]  David H. Gustafson,et al.  Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes , 1976 .

[7]  Longbing Cao,et al.  Metasynthetic Computing for Solving Open Complex Problems , 2008, 2008 32nd Annual IEEE International Computer Software and Applications Conference.

[8]  R. Boumen,et al.  Integration and Test Sequencing for Complex Systems , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[9]  Xia Cui,et al.  Paradigms of Meta-synthetic Computing , 2008, 2008 32nd Annual IEEE International Computer Software and Applications Conference.

[10]  Chengqi Zhang,et al.  Organization-Oriented Analysis of Open Complex Agent Systems , 2005 .

[11]  Thomas R. Hensley,et al.  Victims of Groupthink , 1986 .

[12]  Wenji Mao,et al.  Social Computing: From Social Informatics to Social Intelligence , 2007, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[13]  Anthony Giddens,et al.  Essentials of sociology , 2005 .

[14]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[15]  MengChu Zhou,et al.  Role-Based Multi-Agent Systems , 2008 .

[16]  Chunheng Wang,et al.  Metasynthetic Approach for Handwritten Chinese Character Recognition , 2002, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[17]  John H. Holland,et al.  Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity , 1995 .

[18]  John N. Warfield,et al.  An Introduction to Systems Science , 2006 .

[19]  H. Simon,et al.  The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[20]  Dai Ru,et al.  Open complex giant system , 2001 .

[21]  MengChu Zhou,et al.  Roles in Information Systems: A Survey , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[22]  Jairus Hihn,et al.  Spreadsheets in Team X: Preserving Order in an Inherently Chaotic Environment , 2009 .

[23]  Chengqi Zhang,et al.  The OSOAD Methodology for Open Complex Agent Systems , 2005 .

[24]  MengChu Zhou,et al.  Engineering Open Complex Agent Systems: A Case Study , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[25]  GE Jia-li.  The Determination and Treatment of Divergence Experts in Expert Group Thought , 2007 .

[26]  W. Weaver.  Science and complexity. , 1948, American scientist.

[27]  I. Janis.  Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes , 1982 .

[28]  Cao Long-bing.  Software Architecture of the Hall for Workshop of Metasynthetic Engineering , 2002 .

[29]  John N. Warfield,et al.  Twenty laws of complexity: science applicable in organizations , 1999 .

[30]  G. Miller,et al.  The Cognitive Sciences , 1984 .

[31]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  The Future of Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Application Domains and Research Methods , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[32]  Huaglory Tianfield,et al.  Formalized analysis of structural characteristics of large complex systems , 2001, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[33]  Chengqi Zhang,et al.  Systematic Engineering in Designing Architecture of Telecommunications Business Intelligence System , 2003, HIS.

[34]  John Baer.  Creativity and Divergent Thinking: A Task-Specific Approach , 1993 .