Clinical and economic impact of multipoint left ventricular pacing: A comparative analysis from the Italian registry on multipoint pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy (IRON‐MPP)

Early evidence suggests that multipoint left ventricular pacing (MPP) may improve response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). It is unknown whether this benefit is sustained and cost‐effective. We used real‐world data to evaluate long‐term impact of MPP‐ON clinical status, heart failure hospitalizations (HFH) and costs.

[1]  A. Curnis,et al.  Impact of multipoint pacing on projected battery longevity in cardiac resynchronization therapy. An IRON‐MPP study sub‐analysis , 2019, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[2]  C. Leclercq,et al.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy non-responder to responder conversion rate in the more response to cardiac resynchronization therapy with MultiPoint Pacing (MORE-CRT MPP) study: results from Phase I. , 2019, European heart journal.

[3]  C. Leclercq,et al.  Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of multipoint pacing therapy: MOre REsponse on Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with MultiPoint Pacing (MORE‐CRT MPP–PHASE II) , 2019, American heart journal.

[4]  Jagmeet P. Singh,et al.  Long-term reverse remodeling by cardiac resynchronization therapy with MultiPoint Pacing: A feasibility study of noninvasive hemodynamics-guided device programming. , 2018, Heart rhythm.

[5]  F. Prinzen,et al.  Pressure-Volume Loop Analysis of Multipoint Pacing With a Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. , 2018, JACC. Clinical electrophysiology.

[6]  M. A. Arias,et al.  Estimation of the effects of multipoint pacing on battery longevity in routine clinical practice , 2017, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[7]  J. Baker,et al.  Safety and Efficacy of Multipoint Pacing in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: The MultiPoint Pacing Trial. , 2017, JACC. Clinical electrophysiology.

[8]  L. Di Biase,et al.  Multipoint pacing via a quadripolar left-ventricular lead: preliminary results from the Italian registry on multipoint left-ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy (IRON-MPP) , 2016, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[9]  F. Prinzen,et al.  Optimization of left ventricular pacing site plus multipoint pacing improves remodeling and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy at 1 year. , 2016, Heart rhythm.

[10]  Ó. Cano,et al.  The use of multisite left ventricular pacing via quadripolar lead improves acute haemodynamics and mechanical dyssynchrony assessed by radial strain speckle tracking: initial results. , 2016, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[11]  Reza Razavi,et al.  Mechanistic insights into the benefits of multisite pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy: The importance of electrical substrate and rate of left ventricular activation. , 2015, Heart rhythm.

[12]  L. Tavazzi,et al.  Improving cardiac resynchronization therapy response with multipoint left ventricular pacing: Twelve-month follow-up study. , 2015, Heart rhythm.

[13]  F. Prinzen,et al.  Multipoint pacing by a left ventricular quadripolar lead improves the acute hemodynamic response to CRT compared with conventional biventricular pacing at any site. , 2015, Heart rhythm.

[14]  L. Tavazzi,et al.  Multipoint Left Ventricular Pacing in a Single Coronary Sinus Branch Improves Mid‐Term Echocardiographic and Clinical Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy , 2015, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[15]  Christophe Leclercq,et al.  A review of multisite pacing to achieve cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2015, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[16]  A. Auricchio,et al.  20 years of cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  P. Khairy,et al.  Acute haemodynamic comparison of multisite and biventricular pacing with a quadripolar left ventricular lead. , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[18]  Kawal S. Rhode,et al.  Benefits of Endocardial and Multisite Pacing Are Dependent on the Type of Left Ventricular Electric Activation Pattern and Presence of Ischemic Heart Disease: Insights from Electroanatomic Mapping , 2012, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[19]  Brandon K. Fornwalt,et al.  Agreement Is Poor Among Current Criteria Used to Define Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy , 2010, Circulation.

[20]  R. Grieve,et al.  Non-parametric methods for cost-effectiveness analysis: the central limit theorem and the bootstrap compared. , 2010, Health economics.

[21]  J. Daubert,et al.  The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  S. Thompson,et al.  Analysis of cost data in randomized trials: an application of the non-parametric bootstrap. , 2000, Statistics in medicine.

[23]  Sg Thompson,et al.  Analysis of cost data in randomised controlled trials: An application of the non-parametric bootstrap , 2000 .