Investigating the clinical advantages of a robotic linac equipped with a multileaf collimator in the treatment of brain and prostate cancer patients

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of a commercially available CyberKnife system with a multileaf collimator (CK‐MLC) for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and standard fractionated intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) applications. Ten prostate and ten intracranial cases were planned for the CK‐MLC. Half of these cases were compared with clinically approved SBRT plans generated for the CyberKnife with circular collimators, and the other half were compared with clinically approved standard fractionated IMRT plans generated for conventional linacs. The plans were compared on target coverage, conformity, homogeneity, dose to organs at risk (OAR), low dose to the surrounding tissue, total monitor units (MU), and treatment time. CK‐MLC plans generated for the SBRT cases achieved more homogeneous dose to the target than the CK plans with the circular collimators, for equivalent coverage, conformity, and dose to OARs. Total monitor units were reduced by 40% to 70% and treatment time was reduced by half. The CK‐MLC plans generated for the standard fractionated cases achieved prescription isodose lines between 86% and 93%, which was 2%–3% below the plans generated for conventional linacs. Compared to standard IMRT plans, the total MU were up to three times greater for the prostate (whole pelvis) plans and up to 1.4 times greater for the intracranial plans. Average treatment time was 25 min for the whole pelvis plans and 19 min for the intracranial cases. The CK‐MLC system provides significant improvements in treatment time and target homogeneity compared to the CK system with circular collimators, while maintaining high conformity and dose sparing to critical organs. Standard fractionated plans for large target volumes (>100 cm3) were generated that achieved high prescription isodose levels. The CK‐MLC system provides more efficient SRS and SBRT treatments and, in select clinical cases, might be a potential alternative for standard fractionated treatments. PACS numbers: 87.56.nk, 87.56.bd

[1]  Steven D Chang,et al.  A STUDY OF THE ACCURACY OF CYBERKNIFE SPINAL RADIOSURGERY USING SKELETAL STRUCTURE TRACKING , 2007, Neurosurgery.

[2]  J. Pouliot,et al.  Improving plan quality and consistency by standardization of dose constraints in prostate cancer patients treated with CyberKnife , 2013, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[3]  A. Muacevic,et al.  Advances in fiducial‐free image‐guidance for spinal radiosurgery with CyberKnife – a phantom study , 2010, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[4]  M. Hoogeman,et al.  Variable circular collimator in robotic radiosurgery: a time-efficient alternative to a mini-multileaf collimator? , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  A. Schlaefer,et al.  Stepwise multi-criteria optimization for robotic radiosurgery. , 2008, Medical physics.

[6]  M. McDermott,et al.  Dose conformity of gamma knife radiosurgery and risk factors for complications. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  Alexander Muacevic,et al.  Patient motion and targeting accuracy in robotic spinal radiosurgery: 260 single-fraction fiducial-free cases. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  R K Ten Haken,et al.  Dose, volume, and function relationships in parotid salivary glands following conformal and intensity-modulated irradiation of head and neck cancer. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  W Schlegel,et al.  The design, physical properties and clinical utility of an iris collimator for robotic radiosurgery , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  S. Dieterich,et al.  The CyberKnife in clinical use: current roles, future expectations. , 2011, Frontiers of radiation therapy and oncology.

[11]  Martin J Murphy,et al.  Intrafraction geometric uncertainties in frameless image-guided radiosurgery. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  I. Paddick.  A simple scoring ratio to index the conformity of radiosurgical treatment plans. Technical note. , 2000, Journal of neurosurgery.

[13]  C. Maurer,et al.  The CyberKnife® Robotic Radiosurgery System in 2010 , 2010, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[14]  M. Moerland,et al.  A conformation number to quantify the degree of conformality in brachytherapy and external beam irradiation: application to the prostate. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  Ping Xia,et al.  Dose gradient near target-normal structure interface for nonisocentric CyberKnife and isocentric intensity-modulated body radiotherapy for prostate cancer. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  Ben J M Heijmen,et al.  Shortening treatment time in robotic radiosurgery using a novel node reduction technique. , 2011, Medical physics.

[17]  Martin J Murphy,et al.  Fiducial-based targeting accuracy for external-beam radiotherapy. , 2002, Medical physics.

[18]  J Fairfoul,et al.  Image-guided radiotherapy of the prostate using daily CBCT: the feasibility and likely benefit of implementing a margin reduction. , 2014, The British journal of radiology.

[19]  J. Krayenbuehl,et al.  Dynamic intensity-modulated non-coplanar arc radiotherapy (INCA) for head and neck cancer. , 2006, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[20]  A. Niemierko.  Reporting and analyzing dose distributions: a concept of equivalent uniform dose. , 1997, Medical physics.

[21]  I. Paddick,et al.  A simple scoring ratio to index the conformity of radiosurgical treatment plans , 2001 .

[22]  M Alber,et al.  A finite size pencil beam for IMRT dose optimization , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  Avid,et al.  INTRAFRACTIONAL MOTION OF THE PROSTATE DURING HYPOFRACTIONATED RADIOTHERAPY , 2009 .

[24]  G. Kuduvalli,et al.  A fast, accurate, and automatic 2D-3D image registration for image-guided cranial radiosurgery. , 2008, Medical physics.

[25]  M. Hoogeman,et al.  Reducing monitor units for robotic radiosurgery by optimized use of multiple collimators. , 2008, Medical physics.

[26]  Achim Schweikard,et al.  Respiration tracking in radiosurgery. , 2004, Medical physics.

[27]  J Fan,et al.  SU-GG-T-143: MLC-Based CyberKnife Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer , 2010 .

[28]  F Foppiano,et al.  Fitting late rectal bleeding data using different NTCP models: results from an Italian multi-centric study (AIROPROS0101). , 2004, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[29]  A. Quinn.  CyberKnife: a robotic radiosurgery system. , 2002, Clinical journal of oncology nursing.

[30]  Paul J Keall,et al.  A new formula for normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) as a function of equivalent uniform dose (EUD) , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.