Investigating Risky Choices Over Losses Using Experimental Data

We conduct a battery of experiments in which agents make choices from several pairs of all-loss-lotteries. Using these choices, we estimate a representation of individual preferences over lotteries. We find statistically and economically significant departures from expected utility maximization for many subjects. We also estimate a preference representation based on summary statistics for behavior in the population of subjects, and again find departures from expected utility maximization. Our results suggest that public policies based on an expected utility approach could significantly underestimate preferences and willingness to pay for risk reduction.

[1]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  Neglecting Disaster: Why Don't People Insure Against Large Losses? , 2004 .

[2]  M. Machina Choice under Uncertainty: Problems Solved and Unsolved , 1987 .

[3]  Robert Sugden,et al.  A Microeconometric Test of Alternative Stochastic Theories of Risky Choice , 2002 .

[4]  William S. Neilson,et al.  A Further Examination of Cumulative Prospect Theory Parameterizations , 2002 .

[5]  Colin Camerer Individual Decision Making , 2020, The Handbook of Experimental Economics.

[6]  David W Harless,et al.  Predictions about indifference curves inside the unit triangle: A test of variants of expected utility theory , 1992 .

[7]  C. Starmer Developments in Non-expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice under Risk , 2000 .

[8]  M. Allais Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque : critique des postulats et axiomes de l'ecole americaine , 1953 .

[9]  Thomas D. Crocker,et al.  Risk, Self-Protection, and Ex Ante Economic Value , 1990 .

[10]  G. Chichilnisky Global Environmental Risks , 1993 .

[11]  Joel Huber,et al.  Pricing environmental health risks: survey assessments of risk-risk and risk-dollar trade-offs for chronic bronchitis☆ , 1991 .

[12]  John D. Hey,et al.  Stochastic choice with deterministic preferences: An experimental investigation , 1995 .

[13]  Benefits for Environmental Decisions,et al.  Choice Under Uncertainty: Problems Solved And Unsolved , 1990 .

[14]  David W Harless,et al.  The predictive utility of generalized expected utility theories , 1994 .

[15]  Stanley R. Johnson,et al.  Advanced Econometric Methods , 1984 .

[16]  J. Hey,et al.  INVESTIGATING GENERALIZATIONS OF EXPECTED UTILITY THEORY USING EXPERIMENTAL DATA , 1994, Experiments in Economics.

[17]  V. Smith,et al.  Experimental tests of the endowment effect , 1996 .

[18]  John D. Hey,et al.  Experimental Investigations of Errors in Decision Making under Risk Experimental investigations of errors in decision making under risk , 1995 .

[19]  Mark Dickie,et al.  Willingness to pay for ozone control: Inferences from the demand for medical care , 1991 .

[20]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[21]  D. McFadden,et al.  MIXED MNL MODELS FOR DISCRETE RESPONSE , 2000 .

[22]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Judged frequency of lethal events , 1978 .

[23]  J. Marschak Rational Behavior, Uncertain Prospects, and Measurable Utility (1950) , 1950 .

[24]  Indirect methods for valuing changes in environmental risks with nonexpected utility preferences , 1991 .

[25]  Larry G. Epstein,et al.  MIXTURE SYMMETRY AND QUADRATIC UTILITY , 1991 .

[26]  J. Baron Thinking and Deciding , 2023 .

[27]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Violations of the betweenness axiom and nonlinearity in probability , 1994 .

[28]  K. Train,et al.  Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level , 1998, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[29]  J. Riley,et al.  The analytics of uncertainty and information: Long-run relationships and the credibility of threats and promises , 1992 .

[30]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[31]  Roland Michelitsch,et al.  Experimental tests of the endowment effect , 1996 .

[32]  Reuben G. Gustavson,et al.  Resources for the Future, Annual Report , 1959 .

[33]  K. Train Recreation Demand Models with Taste Differences Over People , 1998 .

[34]  Colin Camerer An experimental test of several generalized utility theories , 1989 .

[35]  M. Machina "Expected Utility" Analysis without the Independence Axiom , 1982 .

[36]  J. Shogren,et al.  Risk and Its Consequences , 1999 .