Agent-based simulations of payoff distribution in economic networks

Simulating the behavior of economic agents fosters the analysis of interconnected markets dynamics. Here, we extend the state of the art by adding realistic details to simulating economic exchange networks. To this end, we use our economic network simulation framework TrEcSim, which is designed to support the following real-life features: complex network topologies, evolution of economic agent roles, dynamic creation of new economic agents, diversity in product types, dynamic evolution of product prices, and investment decisions at agent level. By employing simulation, we determine which topological properties promote meritocracy and fairness. Simulation also allows for analyzing the influence of producers and middlemen distribution in the economic exchange network; similarly, we gain valuable insight regarding the distribution of payoff for each agent role. Moreover, we conclude that economic networks promote fairness throughout their structure, namely that the main determining factor for fairness in payoff distribution is the underlying network topology, not agent role assignment.

[1]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect , 1996 .

[2]  K. Manktelow,et al.  Thinking and Reasoning: An Introduction to the Psychology of Reason, Judgment and Decision Making , 2012 .

[3]  Steven N. Durlauf,et al.  The Economy As an Evolving Complex System III: Current Perspectives and Future Directions , 2005 .

[4]  Duanbing Chen,et al.  Vital nodes identification in complex networks , 2016, ArXiv.

[5]  Giacomo Como,et al.  Opinion Fluctuations and Disagreement in Social Networks , 2010 .

[6]  Mathieu Bastian,et al.  Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks , 2009, ICWSM.

[7]  Mircea Vladutiu,et al.  Simulating Payoff Distribution in Networks of Economic Agents , 2018, 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM).

[8]  Mihai Udrescu,et al.  MuSeNet: Collaboration in the Music Artists Industry , 2014, 2014 European Network Intelligence Conference.

[9]  Massimo Marchiori,et al.  Error and attacktolerance of complex network s , 2004 .

[10]  A. Colman.  The dictionary of psychology. , 2001 .

[11]  Yaneer Bar-Yam,et al.  The limits of phenomenology: From behaviorism to drug testing and engineering design , 2013, Complex..

[12]  J. Kleinberg,et al.  Networks, Crowds, and Markets , 2010 .

[13]  B. Bollobás.  The evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[14]  H. Simon,et al.  Rational choice and the structure of the environment. , 1956, Psychological review.

[15]  K. Arrow,et al.  EXISTENCE OF AN EQUILIBRIUM FOR A COMPETITIVE ECONOMY , 1954 .

[16]  A. Adamou,et al.  An Empirical Test of the Ergodic Hypothesis: Wealth Distributions in the United States , 2017 .

[17]  Alexandru Topirceanu,et al.  A network motif based approach for classifying online social networks , 2014, 2014 IEEE 9th IEEE International Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics (SACI).

[18]  G. Hodgson.  Karl Polanyi on economy and society: a critical analysis of core concepts , 2017 .

[19]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[20]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[21]  Klaus Schittkowski,et al.  EASY-FIT: a software system for data fitting in dynamical systems , 2002 .

[22]  D Kahneman,et al.  On the reality of cognitive illusions. , 1996, Psychological review.

[23]  J. Borondo,et al.  To Each According to its Degree: The Meritocracy and Topocracy of Embedded Markets , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[24]  Bikas K. Chakrabarti,et al.  Econophysics of Markets and Business Networks : Proceedings of the Econophys-Kolkata III , 2007 .

[25]  Asuman E. Ozdaglar,et al.  Opinion Fluctuations and Disagreement in Social Networks , 2010, Math. Oper. Res..

[26]  P. Erdos,et al.  On the evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[27]  H. Simon.  Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations , 1978 .

[28]  Mircea Vladutiu,et al.  Simulating Trade in Economic Networks with TrEcSim , 2017, ENIC.

[29]  A. Adamou,et al.  Wealth Inequality and the Ergodic Hypothesis: Evidence from the United States , 2020, Journal of Income Distribution®.

[30]  P. Walters.  Introduction to Ergodic Theory , 1977 .

[31]  Guanrong Chen,et al.  On the topology of the world exchange arrangements web , 2004, physics/0407046.

[32]  Bharat K. Soni,et al.  Mesh Generation , 2020, Handbook of Computational Geometry.

[33]  Christiaan J. J. Paredis,et al.  The Role and Limitations of Modeling and Simulation in Systems Design , 2004 .

[34]  Li She,et al.  Effectively identifying the influential spreaders in large-scale social networks , 2014, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[35]  Mircea Vladutiu,et al.  Genetically Optimized Realistic Social Network Topology Inspired by Facebook , 2014, Online Social Media Analysis and Visualization.

[36]  M. Small,et al.  Hub nodes inhibit the outbreak of epidemic under voluntary vaccination , 2010 .

[37]  Radu Marculescu,et al.  Tolerance-based interaction: A new model targeting opinion formation and diffusion in social networks , 2015, PeerJ Prepr..