The importance of learning for achieving the UK's targets for offshore wind

Using a purpose-built, multi-sectoral energy-economy-environmental model we evaluate the economic and environmental impact of a reduction in the levelized costs of offshore wind energy generation in the UK. Our modelling approach suggests that in order to significantly increase the offshore wind capacity in the UK the required fall in the generation cost should be larger than expected and certainly bigger than that implied by the most recent cost projections developed by the UK Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC). Potential expansion of the offshore wind sector in the UK crucially depends on the price sensitivity of the energy supply sector and on agent's expectations. Only in our more optimistic scenario do we reach DECC's ambitious challenge of 22 GW offshore wind deployment in 2030 through a constant learning rate alone.

[1]  Patrik Söderholm,et al.  Wind power learning rates: A conceptual review and meta-analysis☆ , 2012 .

[2]  Peter Lund,et al.  Energy and climate change , 2018 .

[3]  K. Turner,et al.  The added value from a general equilibrium analysis of increased efficiency in household energy use , 2013 .

[4]  Peter McGregor,et al.  The impact of increased efficiency in the industrial use of energy: A computable general equilibrium analysis for the United Kingdom , 2007 .

[5]  K. Arrow.  The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .

[6]  C. Wene.  Experience Curves for Energy Technology Policy , 2000 .

[7]  K. Arrow.  The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .

[8]  J. Tobin.  A General Equilibrium Approach to Monetary Theory , 1969 .

[9]  Paul Ekins,et al.  The Structure and Use of the UK MARKAL Model , 2009 .

[10]  K. Swales,et al.  An investigation of issues relating to where energy should enter the production function , 2011 .

[11]  Fumio Hayashi,et al.  TOBIN'S MARGINAL q AND AVERAGE q: A NEOCLASSICAL INTERPRETATION , 1982 .

[12]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  MESSAGE-MACRO: Linking an energy supply model with a macroeconomic module and solving it iteratively , 2000 .

[13]  Armington Elasticities in Intermediate Inputs Trade : A Problem in Using Multilateral Trade Data , 2004 .

[14]  S. Price,et al.  The Elasticity of Substitution: Evidence from a Uk Firm-level Data Set * , 2008 .

[15]  Stephen B. Bayne,et al.  Offshore wind energy: A comparative analysis of UK, USA and India , 2015 .

[16]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  Learning rates for energy technologies , 2001 .

[17]  David J. Evans.  The Elasticity of Marginal Utility of Consumption: Estimates for 20 OECD Countries* , 2005 .

[18]  Kalin Nikolov,et al.  The Bank of England Quarterly Model , 2005 .

[19]  D. Stern,et al.  Interfuel Substitution: A Meta‐Analysis , 2012 .

[20]  Jaime R. Marquez,et al.  Trade Elasticities for G-7 Countries , 1998 .

[21]  P. Aghion,et al.  The Environment and Directed Technical Change , 2009, The American economic review.

[22]  Jonathan Köhler,et al.  Technological change in energy systems: Learning curves, logistic curves and input–output coefficients , 2007 .

[23]  R. Harris.  The Growth and Structure of the UK Regional Economy, 1963-85 , 1989 .

[24]  A. Oswald,et al.  Estimating a Wage Curve for Britain 1973-1990 , 1994 .

[25]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  Global experience curves for wind farms , 2005 .

[26]  R. Kannan,et al.  Hybrid modelling of long-term carbon reduction scenarios for the UK , 2008 .

[27]  S. Kahouli-Brahmi.  Technological learning in energy–environment–economy modelling: A survey , 2008 .

[28]  L. Argote,et al.  Learning Curves in Manufacturing , 1990, Science.

[29]  Patrick Schulte,et al.  Substitution between Clean and Dirty Energy Inputs: A Macroeconomic Perspective , 2017, Review of Economics and Statistics.