Robot-assisted upper extremity rehabilitation for cervical spinal cord injuries: a systematic scoping review

Abstact Purpose: To provide an overview of the feasibility and outcomes of robotic-assisted upper extremity training for individuals with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI), and to identify gaps in current research and articulate future research directions. Materials and methods: A systematic search was conducted using Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CCTR, CDSR, CINAHL and PubMed on June 7, 2017. Search terms included 3 themes: (1) robotics; (2) SCI; (3) upper extremity. Studies using robots for upper extremity rehabilitation among individuals with cervical SCI were included. Identified articles were independently reviewed by two researchers and compared to pre-specified criteria. Disagreements regarding article inclusion were resolved through discussion. The modified Downs and Black checklist was used to assess article quality. Participant characteristics, study and intervention details, training outcomes, robot features, study limitations and recommendations for future studies were abstracted from included articles. Results: Twelve articles (one randomized clinical trial, six case series, five case studies) met the inclusion criteria. Five robots were exoskeletons and three were end-effectors. Sample sizes ranged from 1 to 17 subjects. Articles had variable quality, with quality scores ranging from 8 to 20. Studies had a low internal validity primarily from lack of blinding or a control group. Individuals with mild-moderate impairments showed the greatest improvements on body structure/function and performance-level measures. This review is limited by the small number of articles, low-sample sizes and the diversity of devices and their associated training protocols, and outcome measures. Conclusions: Preliminary evidence suggests robot-assisted interventions are safe, feasible and can reduce active assistance provided by therapists. Implications for rehabilitation Robot-assisted upper extremity training for individuals with cervical spinal cord injury is safe, feasible and can reduce hands-on assistance provided by therapists. Future research in robotics rehabilitation with individuals with spinal cord injury is needed to determine the optimal device and training protocol as well as effectiveness.

[1]  R. Prentice,et al.  Individually randomized intervention trials for disease prevention and control , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[2]  Bruce H Dobkin,et al.  Motor rehabilitation after stroke, traumatic brain, and spinal cord injury: common denominators within recent clinical trials , 2009, Current opinion in neurology.

[3]  Andrea Cherubini,et al.  The Three Laws of Neurorobotics: A Review on What Neurorehabilitation Robots Should Do for Patients and Clinicians , 2016, Journal of medical and biological engineering.

[4]  Hermano Igo Krebs,et al.  Improved motor performance in chronic spinal cord injury following upper-limb robotic training. , 2013, NeuroRehabilitation.

[5]  V. Dietz,et al.  Neurological aspects of spinal-cord repair: promises and challenges , 2006, The Lancet Neurology.

[6]  D. Chambers,et al.  Not only randomized controlled trials, but also case series should be considered in systematic reviews of rapidly developing technologies. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[7]  P Sandercock,et al.  In-hospital care pathways for stroke. , 2004, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[8]  T. Platz,et al.  Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. , 2015, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[9]  Wensheng Guo,et al.  Prevalence of cervical spinal injury in trauma. , 2008, Neurosurgical focus.

[10]  L J Lesko,et al.  What Is Clinical Utility and Why Should We Care? , 2010, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[11]  Yu-Ping Chen,et al.  Effects of robotic therapy on upper-extremity function in children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review , 2016, Developmental neurorehabilitation.

[12]  V. Edgerton,et al.  Robotic training and spinal cord plasticity , 2009, Brain Research Bulletin.

[13]  Marcia Kilchenman O'Malley,et al.  Effects of Assist-As-Needed Upper Extremity Robotic Therapy after Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: A Parallel-Group Controlled Trial , 2017, Front. Neurorobot..

[14]  S L Stover,et al.  Motor recovery of the upper extremities in traumatic quadriplegia: a multicenter study. , 1992, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  Marcia Kilchenman O'Malley,et al.  A robotic exoskeleton for rehabilitation and assessment of the upper limb following incomplete spinal cord injury , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[16]  A. Foongchomcheay,et al.  Systematic review of published studies on aquatic exercise for balance in patients with multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, and hemiplegia , 2016, Hong Kong physiotherapy journal : official publication of the Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association Limited = Wu li chih liao.

[17]  N. Yozbatiran,et al.  Robotic training and clinical assessment of forearm and wrist movements after incomplete spinal cord injury: A case study , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[18]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation. , 2003, Advances in neurology.

[19]  Corwin Boake,et al.  RiceWrist Robotic Device for Upper Limb Training: Feasibility Study and Case Report of Two Tetraplegic Persons with Spinal Cord Injury , 2012 .

[20]  David Geer,et al.  Patient and staff acceptance of robotic technology in occupational therapy: a pilot study. , 1991, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[21]  R. Waters,et al.  Upper extremity pain in the postrehabilitation spinal cord injured patient. , 1992, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[22]  P. Winchester,et al.  A Prediction Model for Determining Over Ground Walking Speed After Locomotor Training in Persons With Motor Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury , 2009, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[23]  J. Kleijnen,et al.  Using Multiple Types of Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions – A Systematic Review , 2013, PloS one.

[24]  L. Friedman.  Commentary: Why we should report results from clinical trial pilot studies , 2013, Trials.

[25]  T. Platz,et al.  Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving generic activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[26]  R. Pea.  User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction , 1987 .

[27]  H I Krebs,et al.  Rehabilitation robotics. , 2013, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[28]  H. Graham,et al.  Characteristics of Interventions Targeting Multiple Lifestyle Risk Behaviours in Adult Populations: A Systematic Scoping Review , 2015, PloS one.

[29]  R. Schaaf,et al.  Use of robotics in spinal cord injury: a case report. , 2012, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[30]  A. Moseley,et al.  INVITED COMMENTARY: Rating the Quality of Trials in Systematic Reviews of Physical Therapy Interventions , 2010, Cardiopulmonary physical therapy journal.

[31]  Marcia Kilchenman O'Malley,et al.  Design and validation of the RiceWrist-S exoskeleton for robotic rehabilitation after incomplete spinal cord injury , 2014, Robotica.

[32]  Volker Dietz,et al.  Restoration of sensorimotor functions after spinal cord injury. , 2014, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[33]  F. Maynard,et al.  Epidemiology of spasticity following traumatic spinal cord injury. , 1990, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[34]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Survey of the needs of patients with spinal cord injury: impact and priority for improvement in hand function in tetraplegics , 2004, Spinal Cord.

[35]  Ranu Jung,et al.  Activity-dependent plasticity in spinal cord injury. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[36]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2010, International journal of surgery.

[37]  W. Miller,et al.  Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence: Methods of the SCIRE Systematic Review. , 2007, Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

[38]  Christie K. Ferreira,et al.  Effect of epidural stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord on voluntary movement, standing, and assisted stepping after motor complete paraplegia: a case study , 2011, The Lancet.

[39]  Bruce H Dobkin,et al.  Training and exercise to drive poststroke recovery , 2008, Nature Clinical Practice Neurology.

[40]  U. Dirnagl,et al.  Functional neurological recovery after spinal cord injury is impaired in patients with infections. , 2012, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[41]  J. Fung,et al.  Effects of robot-assisted therapy on stroke rehabilitation in upper limbs: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[42]  J. Fawcett,et al.  Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury as developed by the ICCP panel: spontaneous recovery after spinal cord injury and statistical power needed for therapeutic clinical trials , 2007, Spinal Cord.

[43]  A. Sarkin,et al.  A systematic scoping review of yoga intervention components and study quality. , 2014, American journal of preventive medicine.

[44]  P. Dario,et al.  Design strategies to improve patient motivation during robot-aided rehabilitation , 2007, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[45]  M J Mulcahey,et al.  Assessment of upper limb in tetraplegia: considerations in evaluation and outcomes research. , 2007, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[46]  L. Weaver,et al.  The dark side of neuroplasticity , 2012, Experimental Neurology.

[47]  M. Popovic,et al.  Relationship between clinical assessments of function and measurements from an upper-limb robotic rehabilitation device in cervical spinal cord injury , 2022 .

[48]  P. Raina,et al.  Assessing the Methodological Quality of Nonrandomized Intervention Studies , 2003, Western journal of nursing research.

[49]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[50]  K. Anderson,et al.  Functional Recovery Measures for Spinal Cord Injury: An Evidence-Based Review for Clinical Practice and Research , 2008, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[51]  Mark Speechley,et al.  A systematic review of the rehabilitation of moderate to severe acquired brain injuries , 2007, Brain injury.

[52]  Robert Riener,et al.  Rehabilitation Robotics , 2013, Found. Trends Robotics.

[53]  V. Dietz,et al.  Difficulty of elderly SCI subjects to translate motor recovery--"body function"--into daily living activities. , 2009, Journal of neurotrauma.

[54]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[55]  R Willms,et al.  Feasibility and efficacy of upper limb robotic rehabilitation in a subacute cervical spinal cord injury population , 2011, Spinal Cord.

[56]  D. P. Eng,et al.  Robotic training and kinematic analysis of arm and hand after incomplete spinal cord injury: A case study , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[57]  V. Dietz.  Human neuronal control of automatic functional movements: interaction between central programs and afferent input. , 1992, Physiological reviews.

[58]  Corwin Boake,et al.  Robotic training and clinical assessment of upper extremity movements after spinal cord injury: a single case report. , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[59]  Alex Mihailidis,et al.  The development of an upper limb stroke rehabilitation robot: identification of clinical practices and design requirements through a survey of therapists , 2011, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[60]  Wolfram Tetzlaff,et al.  Spinal cord injury and plasticity: Opportunities and challenges , 2011, Brain Research Bulletin.

[61]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction , 1988 .

[62]  Zafer Keser,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the primary motor cortex and robot-assisted arm training in chronic incomplete cervical spinal cord injury: A proof of concept sham-randomized clinical study. , 2016, NeuroRehabilitation.

[63]  Michael G Fehlings,et al.  Global prevalence and incidence of traumatic spinal cord injury , 2014, Clinical epidemiology.

[64]  Tadashi Ogura,et al.  Use of an arm weight-bearing combined with upper-limb reaching apparatus to facilitate motor paralysis recovery in an incomplete spinal cord injury patient: a single case report , 2017, Journal of physical therapy science.

[65]  P. Williamson,et al.  Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. , 2004, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[66]  C. S. Bickel,et al.  Systematic review of the methodological quality and outcome measures utilized in exercise interventions for adults with spinal cord injury , 2012, Spinal Cord.

[67]  Won Hyuk Chang,et al.  Robot-assisted Therapy in Stroke Rehabilitation , 2013, Journal of stroke.

[68]  Rahsaan J. Holley,et al.  Robotic Approaches for Rehabilitation of Hand Function After Stroke , 2012, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[69]  A. Wernig,et al.  Weight-supported treadmill vs over-ground training for walking after acute incomplete SCI , 2006, Neurology.

[70]  D. Sackett,et al.  Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't , 1996, BMJ.

[71]  K. Andrews.  The limitations of randomized controlled trials in rehabilitation research , 1991 .

[72]  J. Kleim,et al.  Neural Plasticity: The Biological Substrate For Neurorehabilitation , 2010, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[73]  B. Alstermark,et al.  Effect of spinal cord lesions on forelimb target-reaching and on visually guided switching of target-reaching in the cat , 1997, Neuroscience Research.

[74]  K. Anderson.  Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. , 2004, Journal of neurotrauma.

[75]  A. Spooren,et al.  Robot-assisted task-oriented upper extremity skill training in cervical spinal cord injury: a feasibility study , 2015, Spinal Cord.

[76]  F. Song,et al.  Methodological difificulties in rehabilitation research , 1993 .

[77]  K. Hammell.  Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation , 2014, Therapy in Practice Series.

[78]  Janne M. Veerbeek,et al.  Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy for the Upper Limb After Stroke , 2017, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.