Design of a salisbury screen absorber using frequency selective surfaces to improve bandwidth and angular stability performance

A new design method that greatly enhances the reflectivity bandwidth and angular stability beyond what is possible with a simple Salisbury screen is described. The performance improvement is obtained from a frequency selective surface (FSS) which is sandwiched between the outermost 377 Ω/square resistive sheet and the ground plane. This is designed to generate additional reflection nulls at two predetermined frequencies by selecting the size of the two unequal length printed dipoles in each unit cell. A multiband Salisbury screen is realised by adjusting the reflection phase of the FSS to position one null above and the other below the inherent absorption band of the structure. Alternatively by incorporating resistive elements midway on the dipoles, it is shown that the three absorption bands can be merged to create a structure with a -10 dB reflectivity bandwidth which is 52% larger and relatively insensitive to incident angle compared to a classical Salisbury screen having the same thickness. CST Microwave Studio was used to optimise the reflectivity performance and simulate the radar backscatter from the structure. The numerical results are shown to be in close agreement with bistatic measurements for incident angles up to 40° over the frequency range 5.4-18 GHz.

[1]  D. Werner,et al.  The design synthesis of multiband artificial magnetic conductors using high impedance frequency selective surfaces , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[2]  V. Fusco,et al.  Thin Radar Absorber Using an Artificial Magnetic Ground Plane , 2005, 2006 European Microwave Conference.

[3]  Alan Tennant,et al.  Design of wideband Jaumann radar absorbers with optimum oblique incidence performance , 1994 .

[4]  B. A. Munk,et al.  On Designing Jaumann and Circuit Analog Absorbers (CA Absorbers) for Oblique Angle of Incidence , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[5]  Hans-Erik Nilsson,et al.  Printed antennas with variable conductive ink layer thickness , 2007 .

[6]  D. Pozar,et al.  Design of millimeter wave microstrip reflectarrays , 1997 .

[7]  Vincent Fusco,et al.  Low profile Salisbury screen radar absorber with high impedance ground plane , 2009 .

[8]  Thin Radar Absorber Using an Artificial Magnetic Ground Plane , 2006 .

[9]  Ahmed A. Kishk,et al.  Artificial magnetic conductors realised by frequency-selective surfaces on a grounded dielectric slab for antenna applications , 2006 .

[10]  Vincent Fusco,et al.  Effect of surface resistor loading on high‐impedance surface radar absorber return loss and bandwidth , 2009 .

[11]  Edward A. Parker,et al.  Fabry-Perot approach to the design of double layer FSS , 1996 .

[12]  R. Cahill,et al.  Ultra-thin tunable microwave absorber using liquid crystals , 2008 .

[13]  Barry Chambers,et al.  Optimum design of a Salisbury screen radar absorber , 1994 .

[14]  R. Cahill,et al.  Salisbury screen with reduced angular sensitivity , 2009 .

[15]  Chun-Gon Kim,et al.  Characteristics of an electromagnetic wave absorbing composite structure with a conducting polymer electromagnetic bandgap (EBG) in the X-band , 2008 .

[17]  John L. Volakis,et al.  Frequency-selective surfaces to enhance performance of broad-band reconfigurable arrays , 2002 .

[18]  F. Costa,et al.  Ultra-thin absorbers by using high impedance surfaces with resistive frequency selective surfaces , 2007, 2007 IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium.

[19]  Eugene F. Knott,et al.  Radar Cross Section: Its Prediction, Measurement and Reduction , 1985 .

[20]  Edward A. Parker,et al.  CONVOLUTED DIPOLE ARRAY ELEMENTS , 1991 .