Difference in pulse arrival time at forehead and at finger as a surrogate of pulse transit time

Pulse transit time (PTT) difference (PTTD) to the forehead and finger dynamics are compared to pulse arrival time towards the finger (PATF) dynamics during a tilt table test. Two frequency bands, where different physiological information is expected, are analyzed: low frequency (LF) influenced by both sympathetic and parasympathetic activity, and high frequency (HF) influenced by parasympathetic activity. As PATF, PTTD is influenced by PTT, but in contrast to PATF, PTTD is not influenced by the pre-ejection period (PEP). This is advantaging in certain applications such as arterial stiffness assessment or blood pressure estimation. Results showed higher correlation between PTTD and PATF during rest stages than during tilt stage, when the PEP dynamics have stronger effect in PATF dynamics. This suggests that PTTD variability can potentially be a surrogate of PTT variability that is not influenced by PEP, which is advantaging in the previously mentioned applications. However, further studies must be elaborated in order to evaluate the potential of PTTD in such specific applications.

[1]  Yadong Wang,et al.  Toward a Smartphone Application for Estimation of Pulse Transit Time , 2015, Sensors.

[2]  Eduardo Gil,et al.  Detection of decreases in the amplitude fluctuation of pulse photoplethysmography signal as indication of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in children , 2008, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[3]  C. Julien.  The enigma of Mayer waves: Facts and models. , 2006, Cardiovascular research.

[4]  C. Heneghan,et al.  Pulse transit time-derived respiratory parameters and their variability across sleep stages , 2005, 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference.

[5]  M. Nitzan,et al.  The difference in pulse transit time to the toe and finger measured by photoplethysmography. , 2002, Physiological measurement.

[6]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. , 1996 .

[7]  A. Malliani,et al.  Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use , 1996 .

[8]  Jesús Lázaro,et al.  Pulse Rate Variability Analysis for Discrimination of Sleep-Apnea-Related Decreases in the Amplitude Fluctuations of Pulse Photoplethysmographic Signal in Children , 2014, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[9]  R. Payne,et al.  Pulse transit time measured from the ECG: an unreliable marker of beat-to-beat blood pressure. , 2006, Journal of applied physiology.

[10]  Pablo Laguna,et al.  A wavelet-based ECG delineator: evaluation on standard databases , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Survi Kyal,et al.  Toward Ubiquitous Blood Pressure Monitoring via Pulse Transit Time: Theory and Practice , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  Nigel H. Lovell,et al.  Change in pulse transit time and pre-ejection period during head-up tilt-induced progressive central hypovolaemia , 2007, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.