Learning Curve and Interobserver Agreement of Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy for Detecting Precancerous or Early-Stage Esophageal Squamous Cancer

Background Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) can provide in vivo subcellular resolution images of esophageal lesions. However, the learning curve in interpreting CLE images of precancerous or early-stage esophageal squamous cancer is unknown. The goal of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and inter-observer agreement for differentiating esophageal lesions in CLE images among experienced and inexperienced observers and to assess the learning curve. Method After a short training, 8 experienced and 14 inexperienced endoscopists evaluated in sequence 4 sets of high-quality CLE images. Their diagnoses were corrected and discussed after each set. For each image, the diagnostic results, confidence in diagnosis, quality and time to evaluate were recorded. Results Overall, diagnostic accuracy was greater for the second, third, fourth set of images as compared with the initial set (odds ratio [OR] 2.01, 95% CI 1.22–3.31; 7.95, 3.74–16.87; and 6.45, 3.14–13.27), respectively, with no difference between the third and fourth sets in accuracy (p = 0.67). Previous experience affected the diagnostic accuracy only in the first set of images (OR 3.70, 1.87–7.29, p<0.001). Inter-observer agreement was higher for experienced than inexperienced endoscopists (0.732 vs. 0.666, p<0.01) Conclusion CLE is a promising technology that can be quickly learned after a short training period; previous experience is associated with diagnostic accuracy only at the initial stage of learning.

[1]  Simon K Lo,et al.  The learning curve of in vivo probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for prediction of colorectal neoplasia. , 2009, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[2]  Matthew J Hayat,et al.  Cancer statistics, trends, and multiple primary cancer analyses from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. , 2007, The oncologist.

[3]  C. Koh,et al.  On the road to single-site laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: lessons learned from 60 cases , 2011, Surgical Endoscopy.

[4]  Tao Yu,et al.  Confocal laser endomicroscopy for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. , 2009, Endoscopy.

[5]  D. Rennie,et al.  Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  M. Stolte.  The new Vienna classification of epithelial neoplasia of the gastrointestinal tract: advantages and disadvantages , 2003, Virchows Archiv.

[7]  Khek Yu Ho,et al.  Experienced versus inexperienced confocal endoscopists in the diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma and intestinal metaplasia on confocal images. , 2011, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[8]  Vikas Singh,et al.  Novel Probe-Based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy Criteria and Interobserver Agreement for the Detection of Dysplasia in Barrett's Esophagus , 2011, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[9]  Michael R Hamblin,et al.  CA : A Cancer Journal for Clinicians , 2011 .

[10]  A. Polglase,et al.  Pentax confocal endomicroscope: a novel imaging device for in vivo histology of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract , 2006, Expert review of medical devices.

[11]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global Cancer Statistics , 2011 .

[12]  A. Polglase,et al.  A fluorescence confocal endomicroscope for in vivo microscopy of the upper- and the lower-GI tract. , 2005, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[13]  M. Vieth,et al.  Confocal laser endomicroscopy for in vivo diagnosis of early squamous cell carcinoma in the esophagus. , 2007, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[14]  P. Chen,et al.  Efficacy of confocal laser endomicroscopy for discriminating colorectal neoplasms from non‐neoplasms: a systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2013, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[15]  Paul Fockens,et al.  The learning curve, accuracy, and interobserver agreement of endoscope-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for the differentiation of colorectal lesions. , 2012, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[16]  S. Staibano,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of confocal laser endomicroscopy in diagnosing dysplasia in patients affected by long-standing ulcerative colitis. , 2012, World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[17]  X. Zuo,et al.  Diagnostic value of confocal laser endomicroscopy for gastric superficial cancerous lesions , 2010, Gut.

[18]  A. Jemal,et al.  Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2001, with a special feature regarding survival , 2004, Cancer.

[19]  M. Wallace,et al.  Confocal Endomicroscopy of Colorectal Polyps , 2012, Gastroenterology research and practice.

[20]  Joo Young Cho,et al.  Optical biopsies by confocal endomicroscopy prevent additive endoscopic biopsies before endoscopic submucosal dissection in gastric epithelial neoplasias: a prospective, comparative study. , 2011, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[21]  P. Taylor,et al.  Squamous dysplasia and early esophageal cancer in the Linxian region of China: distinctive endoscopic lesions. , 1993, Gastroenterology.

[22]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[23]  Ahmedin Jemal,et al.  Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975‐2012, featuring the increasing incidence of liver cancer , 2016, Cancer.

[24]  X. Zuo,et al.  Surface maturation scoring for oesophageal squamous intraepithelial neoplasia: a novel diagnostic approach inspired by first endomicroscopic 3-dimensional reconstruction , 2012, Gut.

[25]  M. Wallace,et al.  Accuracy of real-time vs. blinded offline diagnosis of neoplastic colorectal polyps using probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy: a pilot study , 2012, Endoscopy.