Estimation of particle mass concentration in ambient air using a particle counter

Abstract Particle count may have advantage over particle mass concentration for assessing the health effects of airborne particulate matter. However, health effects have mainly been investigated with mass-measuring instruments, so it is important to assess relationships between the variability of particle number, as determined by an optical particle counter, and the variability of particle mass as measured by traditional mass-measuring instruments. We used a light scattering particle counter to monitor the concentration of particulate matter in ambient air in a northern Italian city continuously from August 2005 to July 2006. Six channels were calibrated to count particles in the size range 0.3–10 μm and above. Particles under 0.3 μm cannot be detected by the instrument. The particle counter was placed alongside the mass-measuring instruments of the Environmental Protection Agency of the Region of Piemonte (ARPA). Particle numbers were transformed into masses and compared with PM10 and PM2.5 data obtained from the ARPA instruments. Daily average values were compared. The correlation between the two methods was good for both PM10 (R2 = 0.734) and PM2.5 (R2 = 0.856); differences between means were significant only for PM2.5. These findings suggest that a light scattering particle counter might be suitable for assessing particulate matter variability in epidemiological studies on effects of air pollution, though further investigations are necessary.

[1]  W. Wilson,et al.  Fine particles and coarse particles: concentration relationships relevant to epidemiologic studies. , 1997, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[2]  Cliff I. Davidson,et al.  Pittsburgh air quality study overview , 2004 .

[3]  H. Wichmann,et al.  Variation of particle number and mass concentration in various size ranges of ambient aerosols in Eastern Germany , 1997 .

[4]  B. Gomišček,et al.  Spatial and temporal variations of PM1, PM2.5, PM10 and particle number concentration during the AUPHEP—project , 2004 .

[5]  R. Burnett,et al.  Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. , 2002, JAMA.

[6]  A. Rimm,et al.  Air pollution and emergency department visits for asthma among Ohio Medicaid recipients, 1991-1996. , 2003, Environmental research.

[7]  Phillip L. Williams,et al.  A comparison of two direct-reading aerosol monitors with the federal reference method for PM2.5 in indoor air , 2002 .

[8]  D. Dockery,et al.  An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Hsin-Chung Lu,et al.  Predicting the exceedances of a critical PM10 concentration—a case study in Taiwan , 2003 .

[10]  Ilias G. Kavouras,et al.  Indoor-outdoor relationships of particle number and mass in four European cities , 2008 .

[11]  Zoran Ristovski,et al.  Relation between particle mass and number for submicrometer airborne particles , 1999 .

[12]  Roy M. Harrison,et al.  Measurements of the physical properties of particles in the urban atmosphere , 1999 .

[13]  K. Berhane,et al.  The effect of air pollution on lung development from 10 to 18 years of age. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  F. Dominici,et al.  Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in 20 U.S. cities, 1987-1994. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  Joachim Heinrich,et al.  Comparison of two particle-size spectrometers for ambient aerosol measurements , 2000 .

[16]  J. Morin,et al.  On-road measurements of particle number concentrations and size distributions in urban and tunnel environments , 2004 .

[17]  Jan Willem Erisman,et al.  Variability of particulate matter concentrations along roads and motorways determined by a moving measurement unit , 2004 .

[18]  W G Kreyling,et al.  Daily mortality and fine and ultrafine particles in Erfurt, Germany part I: role of particle number and particle mass. , 2000, Research report.

[19]  Bert Brunekreef,et al.  Concentrations of ultrafine, fine and PM2.5 particles in three European cities , 2001 .

[20]  K. Wittmaack,et al.  Advanced evaluation of size-differential distributions of aerosol particles , 2002 .

[21]  Michael A. Taylor,et al.  Quantitative measures for shape and size of particles , 2002 .