The origin of SFOAE microstructure in the guinea pig

Human stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) evoked by low-level stimuli have previously been shown to have properties consistent with such emissions arising from a linear place-fixed reflection mechanism with SFOAE microstructure thought to be due to a variation in the effective reflectance with position along the cochlea [Zweig and Shera, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98 (1995) 2018-2047]. Here we report SFOAEs in the guinea pig obtained using a nonlinear extraction paradigm from the ear-canal recording that show amplitude and phase microstructure akin to that seen in human SFOAEs. Inverse Fourier analysis of the SFOAE spectrum indicates that SFOAEs in the guinea pig are a stimulus level-dependent mix of OAEs arising from linear-reflection and nonlinear-distortion mechanisms. Although the SFOAEs are dominated by OAE generated by a linear-reflection mechanism at low and moderate stimulus levels, nonlinear distortion can dominate some part of, or all of, the emission spectrum at high levels. Amplitude and phase microstructure in the guinea pig SFOAE is evidently a construct of (i). the complex addition of nonlinear-distortion and linear-reflection components; (ii). variation in the effective reflectance with position along the cochlea; and perhaps (iii). the complex addition of multiple intra-cochlear reflections.

[1]  C. A. Shera,et al.  WAVE INTERFERENCE IN THE GENERATION OF REFLECTION- AND DISTORTION-SOURCE EMISSIONS , 2003 .

[2]  G. Long,et al.  Modeling otoacoustic emission and hearing threshold fine structures. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  D T Kemp,et al.  A Guide to the Effective Use of Otoacoustic Emissions , 1990, Ear and hearing.

[4]  G. Zweig,et al.  The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  G. Zweig,et al.  Noninvasive measurement of the cochlear traveling-wave ratio. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Graeme K. Yates,et al.  Reply to “Comment on ‘Enhancement of the transient-evoked otoacoustic emission produced by the addition of a pure tone in the guinea pig’ ” [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 919–921 (1999)] , 1999 .

[7]  G. Long,et al.  Modeling the combined effects of basilar membrane nonlinearity and roughness on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission fine structure. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  S Dhar,et al.  Experimental confirmation of the two-source interference model for the fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Christopher A Shera,et al.  Stimulus-frequency-emission group delay: a test of coherent reflection filtering and a window on cochlear tuning. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  P. Fahey,et al.  Nonlinear interactions that could explain distortion product interference response areas. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  E Zwicker,et al.  Interrelation of different oto-acoustic emissions. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  M. Souter Stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions from guinea pig and human subjects , 1995, Hearing Research.

[13]  G K Yates,et al.  Enhancement of the transient-evoked otoacoustic emission produced by the addition of a pure tone in the guinea pig. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  G. Long,et al.  Multiple internal reflections in the cochlea and their effect on DPOAE fine structure. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Generation of DPOAEs in the guinea pig , 2003, Hearing Research.

[16]  D. T. Kemp,et al.  Towards a model for the origin of cochlear echoes , 1980, Hearing Research.

[17]  R. Kalluri,et al.  Distortion-product source unmixing: a test of the two-mechanism model for DPOAE generation. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  G K Yates,et al.  Otoacoustic emissions measured with a physically open recording system. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler,et al.  Suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) near 2f1−f2 removes DP-gram fine structure—Evidence for a secondary generator , 1998 .

[20]  D. Kemp,et al.  Time-domain observation of otoacoustic emissions during constant tone stimulation. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  J. Guinan,et al.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  D. Kemp,et al.  Suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  D. T. Kemp,et al.  Properties of the generator of stimulated acoustic emissions , 1980, Hearing Research.