Alternative approaches to include exogenous variables in DEA measures: A comparison using Monte Carlo

The theory for measuring efficiency of producers has developed alternative approaches to correct for the effect of non-discretionary variables in the analysis. A review of different options in the specific literature of Data envelopment analysis (DEA) allows us to identify three main approaches: one-stage, two-stage and multi-stage models. Recently, some of these models have been improved through the development of bootstrap methods making it possible to make inference and to avoid bias in the estimation of efficiency scores. The aim of this paper is to test the performance of these recent models and to compare among them using simulated data from a Monte Carlo experimental design.

[1]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  A Comparison of Regression Analysis and Data Envelopment Analysis as Alternative Methods for Performance Assessments , 1993 .

[2]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes , 2007 .

[3]  G. Hanoch,et al.  CRESH Production Functions , 1971 .

[4]  Ana S. Camanho,et al.  Efficiency analysis accounting for internal and external non-discretionary factors , 2009, Comput. Oper. Res..

[5]  Francisco Pedraja-Chaparro,et al.  On the Role of Weight Restrictions in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1997 .

[6]  G. Battese,et al.  A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data , 1995 .

[7]  Lukas Steinmann,et al.  On the comparability of efficiency scores in nonparametric frontier models , 2003 .

[8]  António Afonso,et al.  Cross-Country Efficiency of Secondary Education Provision: A Semi-Parametric Analysis with Non-Discretionary Inputs , 2005 .

[9]  R. Bartels,et al.  The Effect of Sample Size on the Mean Efficiency in DEA with an Application to Electricity Distribution in Australia, Sweden and New Zealand , 1998 .

[10]  Renato De Leone,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis , 2009, Encyclopedia of Optimization.

[11]  John Ruggiero,et al.  Evaluating alternative DEA models used to control for non-discretionary inputs , 2006, Comput. Oper. Res..

[12]  D. S. Holland,et al.  Impacts of Random Noise and Specification on Estimates of Capacity Derived from Data Envelopment Analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Léopold Simar,et al.  Of Course We Can Bootstrap DEA Scores! But Does It Mean Anything? Logic Trumps Wishful Thinking , 1999 .

[14]  John Ruggiero,et al.  On the measurement of technical efficiency in the public sector , 1996 .

[15]  Mikko J. Syrjänen,et al.  Non-discretionary and discretionary factors and scale in data envelopment analysis , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Harold O. Fried,et al.  Incorporating the Operating Environment Into a Nonparametric Measure of Technical Efficiency , 1999 .

[17]  S. Grosskopf,et al.  Measuring hospital performance. A non-parametric approach. , 1987, Journal of health economics.

[18]  John Ruggiero,et al.  Non-discretionary inputs in data envelopment analysis , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Ayoe Hoff,et al.  Second stage DEA: Comparison of approaches for modelling the DEA score , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  Byeong-Ho Gong,et al.  Finite sample evidence on the performance of stochastic frontiers and data envelopment analysis using panel data , 1992 .

[21]  F Pedraja-Chaparro,et al.  On the quality of the data envelopment analysis model , 1999, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[22]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Some Problems with the Ferrier/Hirschberg Bootstrap Idea , 1997 .

[23]  Subhash C. Ray,et al.  Resource-Use Efficiency in Public Schools: A Study of Connecticut Data , 1991 .

[24]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[25]  Harold O. Fried,et al.  The measurement of productive efficiency : techniques and applications , 1993 .

[26]  M. A. Muñiz,et al.  Separating managerial inefficiency and external conditions in data envelopment analysis , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  R. Banker,et al.  A Monte Carlo comparison of two production frontier estimation methods: Corrected ordinary least squares and data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[28]  James Lambrinos,et al.  Evaluating the performance of professional golfers on the PGA, LPGA and SPGA tours , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  H. O. Fried,et al.  Accounting for Environmental Effects and Statistical Noise in Data Envelopment Analysis , 2002 .

[30]  J. M. Pastor,et al.  An Efficiency Comparison of European Banking Systems Operating under Different Environmental Conditions , 2002 .

[31]  Chunyan Yu,et al.  The effects of exogenous variables in efficiency measurement - A monte carlo study , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[32]  Philippe Vanden Eeckaut,et al.  Evaluating the performance of US credit unions , 1993 .

[33]  António Afonso CROSS-COUNTRY EFFICIENCY OF SECONDARY EDUCATION PROVISION A SEMI-PARAMETRIC ANALYSIS WITH INPUTS , 2006 .

[34]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Data envelopment analysis and regression approaches to efficiency estimation and evaluation , 1984, Ann. Oper. Res..

[35]  Isabel María García Sánchez,et al.  Efficiency evaluation in municipal services: an application to the street lighting service in Spain , 2007 .

[36]  Remo Guidieri Res , 1995, RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics.

[37]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Efficiency Analysis for Exogenously Fixed Inputs and Outputs , 1986, Oper. Res..

[38]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[39]  T. Nunnikhoven,et al.  Technical efficiency of for‐profit and non‐profit nursing homes , 1992 .

[40]  Patrick T. Harker,et al.  Overcoming the Inherent Dependency of DEA Efficiency Scores: A Bootstrap Approach , 1999 .

[41]  José Manuel Cordero-Ferrera,et al.  Measuring efficiency in education: an analysis of different approaches for incorporating non-discretionary inputs , 2008 .

[42]  Joseph C. Paradi,et al.  Cross Firm Bank Branch Benchmarking Using "Handicapped" Data Envelopment Analysis to Adjust for Corporate Strategic Effects , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[43]  Harold O. Fried,et al.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency and Productivity Growth , 2008 .