On the effective measurement frequency of time domain reflectometry in dispersive and nonconductive dielectric materials

[1] Time domain reflectometry (TDR) is one of the most commonly used techniques for water content determination in the subsurface. The measurement results in a single bulk permittivity value that corresponds to a particular, but unknown, “effective” frequency (feff). Estimating feff using TDR is important, as it allows comparisons with other techniques, such as impedance or capacitance probes, or microwave remote sensing devices. Soils, especially those with high clay and organic matter content, show appreciable dielectric dispersion, i.e., the real permittivity changes as a function of frequency. Consequently, comparison of results obtained with different sensor types must account for measurement frequency in assessing sensor accuracy and performance. In this article we use a transmission line model to examine the impact of dielectric dispersion on the TDR signal, considering lossless materials (negligible electrical conductivity). Permittivity is inferred from the standard tangent line fitting procedure (KaTAN) and by a method of using the apex of the derivative of the TDR waveform (KaDER). The permittivity determined using the tangent line method is considered to correspond to a velocity associated with a maximum passable frequency; whereas we consider the permittivity determined from the derivative method to correspond with the frequency associated with the signal group velocity. The effective frequency was determined from the 10–90% risetime of the reflected signal. On the basis of this definition, feff was found to correspond with the permittivity determined from KaDER and not from KaTAN in dispersive dielectrics. The modeling is corroborated by measurements in bentonite, ethanol and 1-propanol/water mixtures, which demonstrate the same result. Interestingly, for most nonconductive TDR measurements, frequencies are expected to lie in a range from 0.7 to 1 GHz, while in dispersive media, feff is expected to fall below 0.6 GHz.

[1]  G. C. Topp,et al.  Comments on ‘Considerations on the use of time‐domain reflectometry (TDR) for measuring soil water content’ by W.R. Whalley , 1994 .

[2]  Johan Alexander Huisman,et al.  Measuring soil water content with ground penetrating radar , 2003 .

[3]  R. Mcfarlane,et al.  The effect of soil electrical conductivity on moisture determination using time-domain reflectometry in sandy soil , 2000 .

[4]  W. R. Whalley.  Considerations on the use of time‐domain reflectometry (TDR) for measuring soil water content , 1993 .

[5]  A. P. Annan,et al.  Measuring Soil Water Content with Ground Penetrating Radar: A Review , 2003 .

[6]  S. Jones,et al.  Considerations for Improving the Accuracy of Permittivity Measurement using Time Domain Reflectometry , 2003 .

[7]  M. A. Hilhorst.  Dielectric characterisation of soil. , 1998 .

[8]  Vincent P. Drnevich,et al.  Theoretical model of a multisection time domain reflectometry measurement system , 1999 .

[9]  J. Starr,et al.  Real-time soil water dynamics using multisensor capacitance probes : Laboratory calibration , 1997 .

[10]  G. C. Topp,et al.  Impacts of the Real and Imaginary Components of Relative Permittivity on Time Domain Reflectometry Measurements in Soils , 2000 .

[11]  M. Schaap,et al.  Measurement and modeling of the TDR signal propagation through layered dielectric media , 2003 .

[12]  Willem Bouten,et al.  Comparison of travel time analysis and inverse modeling for soil water content determination with time domain reflectometry , 2002 .

[13]  Brian C. Wadell,et al.  Transmission Line Design Handbook , 1991 .

[14]  Timo J. Heimovaara,et al.  Frequency domain analysis of time domain reflectometry waveforms: 1. Measurement of the complex dielectric permittivity of soils , 1994 .

[15]  James E. Ayars,et al.  Calibration of Capacitance Probe Sensors using Electric Circuit Theory , 2004 .

[16]  W. R. Hook,et al.  The Effects of Salinity on the Accuracy and Uncertainty of Water Content Measurement , 2004 .

[17]  S. Jones,et al.  A Review of Advances in Dielectric and Electrical Conductivity Measurement in Soils Using Time Domain Reflectometry , 2003 .

[18]  A. Hippel,et al.  Dielectrics and Waves , 1966 .

[19]  T. J. Dean,et al.  SOIL MOISTURE MEASUREMENT BY AN IMPROVED CAPACITANCE TECHNIQUE, PART I. SENSOR DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE , 1987 .

[20]  C. Dirksen,et al.  IMPROVED CALIBRATION OF TIME DOMAIN REFLECTOMETRY SOIL WATER CONTENT MEASUREMENTS , 1993 .

[21]  G. Sposito,et al.  Computer Simulation of Interlayer Molecular Structure in Sodium Montmorillonite Hydrates , 1995 .

[22]  M. Fernando,et al.  A NEW APPROACH TO DETERMINATION OF CATION EXCHANGE CAPACITY , 1977 .

[23]  A. P. Annan,et al.  Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: Measurements in coaxial transmission lines , 1980 .

[24]  W. C. Elmore,et al.  Physics of Waves , 1969 .

[25]  Marcel G. Schaap,et al.  Considerations for Improving the Accuracy of Permittivity Measurement Using TDR: Air/Water Calibration, Effects of Cable Length , 2003 .