Trust in Automated Vehicles

Abstract Increasing degrees of automation in on-road vehicles bear great potential for heightened driver safety and traffic efficiency in both the near and far future. The more the driver delegates control to the vehicle, the more salient the issue of trust in automated technology becomes. Misaligned trust can lead to mishandling of automation controls in individual instances and decreases the general acceptance of on-road automation on a broader scale. In this paper, we apply insights from trust research for dynamic web service interaction to the novel automated driving domain, in order to scope the problem space regarding trust in automated vehicles. We conclude that the appropriate communication of trustworthiness, the necessity to calibrate trust, the importance of intervention capabilities by the driver, and the unambiguous transparency of locus of control are all important aspects when in comes to understanding trust in automated vehicles.

[1]  Mike McDonald,et al.  Advanced Driver Assistance Systems from Autonomous to Cooperative Approach , 2008 .

[2]  Bryan Reimer,et al.  Driver Assistance Systems and the Transition to Automated Vehicles: A Path to Increase Older Adult Safety and Mobility? , 2014 .

[3]  Susan Wiedenbeck,et al.  On-line trust: concepts, evolving themes, a model , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[4]  Hermann Winner,et al.  Three Decades of Driver Assistance Systems: Review and Future Perspectives , 2014, IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine.

[5]  Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles , 2022 .

[6]  R. Gurrea,et al.  The role played by perceived usability, satisfaction and consumer trust on website loyalty , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[7]  J. Rotter.  A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. , 1967, Journal of personality.

[8]  Alexander G. Mirnig,et al.  A Framework for Analyzing and Calibrating Trust in Automated Vehicles , 2016, AutomotiveUI.

[9]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  Trust in Automation as a Matter of Media Influence and Experi-ence of Automated Vehicles , 2016 .

[10]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  Privacy in e-commerce: examining user scenarios and privacy preferences , 1999, EC '99.

[11]  Achim D. Brucker,et al.  The Aniketos Platform , 2014, Secure and Trustworthy Service Composition.

[12]  Fred D. Davis.  A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems : theory and results , 1985 .

[13]  Masooda Bashir,et al.  Trust in Automation , 2015, Hum. Factors.

[14]  J. Parker.  To trust or not to trust. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  Kim,et al.  Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement , 1986 .

[16]  Regina A. Pomranky,et al.  The role of trust in automation reliance , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[17]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  Trust in Automation – Before and After the Experience of Take-over Scenarios in a Highly Automated Vehicle☆ , 2015 .

[18]  Jens Riegelsberger,et al.  The mechanics of trust: A framework for research and design , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[19]  John D. Lee,et al.  Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance , 2004 .

[20]  Jens Riegelsberger,et al.  The researcher's dilemma: evaluating trust in computer-mediated communication , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[21]  S. Diller,et al.  The evolving role of security, privacy, and trust in a digitized world , 2002 .

[22]  Andrina Granic,et al.  Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013 , 2014, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[23]  Achim D. Brucker,et al.  The Aniketos Service Composition Framework - Analysing and Ranking of Secure Services , 2014, Secure and Trustworthy Service Composition.

[24]  Rohan Chauhan,et al.  Advanced Driver Assistance Systems , 2016 .