Annual Reproductive Yield in the Cooperative Pygmy Nuthatch (sitta-Pygmaea)

We studied cooperative-breeding Pygmy Nuthatches (Sitta pygmaea) for 4 yr in northern Arizona. Breeding units contained 2-5 birds. Helpers were found at about 30% of all nests. All helpers that later bred on the study area were male. Helpers were mostly yearlings, and offspring or siblings of the birds that they aided, but often aided at least one unrelated breeder. Breeding units with helpers produced significantly more young than those without helpers. Breeding units in habitats with the greatest floral diversity and structural maturity fledged significantly more young than those in other habitats. Habitat did not influence the effect of helpers. Year effects increased the strength of the relationship between helpers and annual reproductive output. Previous breeding experience and pair-bond duration were not related to reproductive success. Total brood loss, although rare, was responsible for the difference in reproductive output among pairs with and without helpers and between habitats. Breeding birds with helpers benefit by an increase in direct fitness. The advantage to the helpers is not clear but may be an increase in indirect fitness associated with aiding relatives. Helpers may benefit directly, however, by sharing roosting cavities on a group territory thereby enhancing overwinter survival.

[1]  H. Reyer Investment and relatedness: A cost/benefit analysis of breeding and helping in the pied kingfisher (Ceryle rudis) , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  E. R. Brown,et al.  Helpers: Effects of Experimental Removal on Reproductive Success , 1982, Science.

[3]  W. Koenig,et al.  Reproductive Success, Group Size, and the Evolution of Cooperative Breeding in the Acorn Woodpecker , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[4]  J. Ligon,et al.  Communal breeding in green woodhoopoes as a case for reciprocity , 1978, Nature.

[5]  G. E. Woolfenden,et al.  The Inheritance of Territory in Group-Breeding Birds , 1978 .

[6]  R. Balda,et al.  The relationship of habitat quality to group size in Hall's babbler (Pomastostomus halli) , 1977 .

[7]  Glen E. Woolfenden,et al.  Florida Scrub Jay Helpers at the Nest , 1975 .

[8]  Jerram L. Brown Alternate Routes to Sociality in Jays—With a Theory for the Evolution of Altruism and Communal Breeding , 1974 .

[9]  V. Parry The Auxiliary Social System and Its Effect on Territory and Breeding in Kookaburras , 1973 .

[10]  J. M. Smith,et al.  Wife Sharing in the Tasmanian Native Hen, Tribonyx mortierii: A Case of Kin Selection? , 1972, The American Naturalist.

[11]  D. Lack,et al.  Ecological adaptations for breeding in birds , 1969 .

[12]  I. Rowley The life history of the Superb Blue Wren, Malurus cyaneus , 1965 .

[13]  W. Hamilton The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  R. Norris,et al.  Comparative Biosystematics and Life History of the Nuthatches Sitta Pygmaea and Sitta Pusilla. , 1959 .