Emission-Intensity-Based Carbon Tax and Its Impact on Generation Self-Scheduling

We propose an emission-intensity-based carbon-tax policy for the electric-power industry and investigate the impact of the policy on thermal generation self-scheduling in a deregulated electricity market. The carbon-tax policy is designed to take a variable tax rate that increases stepwise with the increase of generation emission intensity. By introducing a step function to express the variable tax rate, we formulate the generation self-scheduling problem under the proposed carbon-tax policy as a mixed integer nonlinear programming model. The objective function is to maximize total generation profits, which are determined by generation revenue and the levied carbon tax over the scheduling horizon. To solve the problem, a decomposition algorithm is developed where the variable tax rate is transformed into a pure integer linear formulation and the resulting problem is decomposed into multiple generation self-scheduling problems with a constant tax rate and emission-intensity constraints. Numerical results demonstrate that the proposed decomposition algorithm can solve the considered problem in a reasonable time and indicate that the proposed carbon-tax policy can enhance the incentive for generation companies to invest in low-carbon generation capacity.

[1]  N. S. Babu,et al.  Analytical solution for combined economic and emissions dispatch , 2008 .

[2]  Jonathan F. Bard,et al.  Short-Term Scheduling of Thermal-Electric Generators Using Lagrangian Relaxation , 1988, Oper. Res..

[3]  Ruiwei Jiang,et al.  Robust Unit Commitment With Wind Power and Pumped Storage Hydro , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[4]  Qian Wang,et al.  A bibliometric analysis of research on carbon tax from 1989 to 2014 , 2016 .

[5]  Lixin Tang,et al.  Corrective Unit Commitment to an Unforeseen Unit Breakdown , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  He Xu,et al.  A review of China’s carbon trading market , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[7]  Kenneth C. Johnson,et al.  A Decarbonization Strategy for the Electricity Sector: New-Source Subsidies , 2010 .

[8]  S. M. Shahidehpour,et al.  A new approach for GenCos profit based unit commitment in day-ahead competitive electricity markets considering reserve uncertainty , 2007 .

[9]  Xiaoli Zhao,et al.  An Improved Lagrangian Relaxation Algorithm for the Robust Generation Self-Scheduling Problem , 2018 .

[10]  Alireza Soroudi,et al.  Robust optimization based self scheduling of hydro-thermal Genco in smart grids , 2013 .

[11]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Potential impact of (CET) carbon emissions trading on China’s power sector: A perspective from different allowance allocation options , 2010 .

[12]  Risto Lahdelma,et al.  CO2 emissions trading planning in combined heat and power production via multi-period stochastic optimization , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  A. Ellerman,et al.  The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme: Origins, Allocation, and Early Results , 2007, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[14]  Sanna Syri,et al.  The impacts of EU CO2 emissions trading on electricity markets and electricity consumers in Finland , 2008 .

[15]  S. M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Extended neighborhood search algorithm for constrained unit commitment , 1997 .

[16]  P. Ferrao,et al.  Potential of CO2 (carbon dioxide) taxes as a policy measure towards low-carbon Portuguese electricity sector by 2050 , 2014 .

[17]  Lixin Tang,et al.  Generation Scheduling Under a CO2 Emission Reduction Policy in the Deregulated Market , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[18]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Price-based unit commitment: a case of Lagrangian relaxation versus mixed integer programming , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[19]  G. Metcalf Designing a Carbon Tax to Reduce U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions , 2008, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[20]  Channing Arndt,et al.  Introducing carbon taxes in South Africa , 2014 .

[21]  Lixin Tang,et al.  Two-stage minimax stochastic unit commitment , 2017 .

[22]  Donald F. Larson,et al.  Short Term Electric Production Technology Switching Under Carbon Cap and Trade , 2012 .

[23]  J. R. McDonald,et al.  Influence of the Emissions Trading Scheme on generation scheduling , 2009 .

[24]  Sidong Liu,et al.  Self-scheduling of a power generating company: Carbon tax considerations , 2016, Comput. Oper. Res..

[25]  Boqiang Lin,et al.  The effect of carbon tax on per capita CO2 emissions , 2011 .

[26]  T. Gjengedal,et al.  Emission constrained unit-commitment (ECUC) , 1996 .

[27]  Sunhee Suk,et al.  An analysis of company choice preference to carbon tax policy in China , 2015 .

[28]  Shengwei Mei,et al.  Taxing Strategies for Carbon Emissions: A Bilevel Optimization Approach , 2014 .

[29]  Víctor Manuel Fernandes Mendes,et al.  Self-scheduling and bidding strategies of thermal units with stochastic emission constraints , 2015 .

[30]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Stochastic Security-Constrained Unit Commitment , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[31]  Nathaniel O. Keohane,et al.  Cap and Trade, Rehabilitated: Using Tradable Permits to Control U.S. Greenhouse Gases , 2008, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[32]  Alfred Baghramian,et al.  Optimal power scheduling of thermal units considering emission constraint for GENCOs’ profit maximization , 2016 .

[33]  Yakun Li,et al.  Impact of carbon allowance allocation on power industry in China’s carbon trading market: Computable general equilibrium based analysis , 2018, Applied Energy.