Long-term recordings of local field potentials from implanted deep brain stimulation electrodes.

BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus is an effective treatment for Parkinson disease. However, DBS is not responsive to an individual's disease state, and programming parameters, once established, do not change to reflect disease state. Local field potentials (LFPs) recorded from DBS electrodes are being investigated as potential biomarkers for the Parkinson disease state. However, no patient data exist about what happens to LFPs over the lifetime of the implant. OBJECTIVE We investigated whether LFP amplitude and response to limb movement differed between patients implanted acutely with subthalamic nucleus DBS electrodes and patients implanted 2 to 7 years previously. METHODS We recorded LFPs at DBS surgery time (9 subjects), 3 weeks after initial placement (9 subjects), and 2 to 7 years (median: 3.5) later during implanted programmable generator replacement (11 sides). LFP power-frequency spectra for each of 3 bipolar electrode derivations of adjacent contacts were calculated over 5-minute resting and 30-second movement epochs. Monopolar impedance data were used to evaluate trends over time. RESULTS There was no significant difference in β-band LFP amplitude between initial electrode implantation (OR) and 3-week post-OR times (P=.94). However, β-band amplitude was lower at implanted programmable generator replacement times than in OR (P=.008) and post-OR recordings (P=.039). Impedance measurements declined over time (P<.001). CONCLUSION Postoperative LFP activity can be recorded years after DBS implantation and demonstrates a similar profile in response to movement as during acute recordings, although amplitude may decrease. These results support the feasibility of constructing a closed-loop, patient-responsive DBS device based on LFP activity.

[1]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  P. Brown,et al.  Event-related beta desynchronization in human subthalamic nucleus correlates with motor performance. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  Jeffrey D. Schall,et al.  Review of signal distortion through metal microelectrode recording circuits and filters , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[4]  S. Cogan Neural stimulation and recording electrodes. , 2008, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[5]  Christine Haberler,et al.  No tissue damage by chronic deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease , 2000, Annals of neurology.

[6]  P J Kelly,et al.  Microelectrode recording during posteroventral pallidotomy: impact on target selection and complications. , 1999, Neurosurgery.

[7]  Nuri Firat Ince,et al.  Selection of Optimal Programming Contacts Based on Local Field Potential Recordings From Subthalamic Nucleus in Patients With Parkinson's Disease , 2010, Neurosurgery.

[8]  P. Brown,et al.  Synchronous unit activity and local field potentials evoked in the subthalamic nucleus by cortical stimulation. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  J. Trojanowski,et al.  Hypothyroidism and Parkinson's disease and the issue of diagnostic confusion , 2003, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[10]  J. Dostrovsky,et al.  Dependence of subthalamic nucleus oscillations on movement and dopamine in Parkinson's disease. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  Peter Brown,et al.  Intra-operative recordings of local field potentials can help localize the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's disease surgery , 2006, Experimental Neurology.

[12]  J. Dostrovsky,et al.  Increased gamma oscillatory activity in the subthalamic nucleus during tremor in Parkinson's disease patients. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Svjetlana Miocinovic,et al.  Experimental and theoretical characterization of the voltage distribution generated by deep brain stimulation , 2009, Experimental Neurology.

[14]  J. Dostrovsky,et al.  Beta oscillatory activity in the subthalamic nucleus and its relation to dopaminergic response in Parkinson's disease. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  Matthew D. Johnson,et al.  In vivo impedance spectroscopy of deep brain stimulation electrodes , 2009, Journal of neural engineering.

[16]  Guglielmo Foffani,et al.  Time dependent subthalamic local field potential changes after DBS surgery in Parkinson's disease , 2010, Experimental Neurology.

[17]  Y. Agid,et al.  Parkinson's disease, subthalamic stimulation, and selection of candidates: A pathological study , 2003, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[18]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Sources and effects of electrode impedance during deep brain stimulation , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[19]  V. Fung,et al.  Postmortem analysis of bilateral subthalamic electrode implants in Parkinson's disease , 2002, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[20]  J. Haueisen,et al.  Influence of tissue resistivities on neuromagnetic fields and electric potentials studied with a finite element model of the head , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  I. McKeith,et al.  Cerebral atrophy in Parkinson's disease with and without dementia: a comparison with Alzheimer's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies and controls. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  C. Shieff,et al.  Electrical impedance recording for localization in functional neurosurgery of the spinal cord and lower brain stem. , 1987, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplementum.

[23]  C. Bjarkam,et al.  Chronic subthalamic high‐frequency deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease – a histopathological study , 2007, European journal of neurology.