Convex Optimization-Based Model Predictive Control for the Guidance of Active Debris Removal Transfers

Active debris removal (ADR) missions have garnered significant interest as means of mitigating collision risks in space. This work proposes a convex optimization-based model predictive control (MPC) approach to provide guidance for such missions. While convex optimization can obtain optimal solutions in polynomial time, it relies on the successive convexification of nonconvex dynamics, leading to inaccuracies. Here, the need for successive convexification is eliminated by using near-linear Generalized Equinoctial Orbital Elements (GEqOE) and by updating the reference trajectory through a new split-Edelbaum approach. The solution accuracy is then measured relative to a high-fidelity dynamics model, showing that the MPC-convex method can generate accurate solutions without iterations.

[1]  S. Ulrich,et al.  Fast Model Predictive Control for Spacecraft Rendezvous and Docking with Obstacle Avoidance , 2023, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics.

[2]  C. Damaren,et al.  Equinoctial Lyapunov Control Law for Low-Thrust Rendezvous , 2023, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics.

[3]  C. Bombardelli,et al.  Near-Linear Orbit Uncertainty Propagation Using the Generalized Equinoctial Orbital Elements , 2022, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics.

[4]  R. Armellin,et al.  Design and guidance of a multi-active debris removal mission , 2022, Astrodynamics.

[5]  P. Di Lizia,et al.  Guidance Strategy for Autonomous Inspection of Unknown Non-Cooperative Resident Space Objects , 2021, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics.

[6]  C. Bombardelli,et al.  A generalization of the equinoctial orbital elements , 2021, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy.

[7]  François Chaumette,et al.  The active space debris removal mission RemoveDebris. Part 1: From concept to launch , 2020, Acta Astronautica.

[8]  Surekha Kamath,et al.  Review of Active Space Debris Removal Methods , 2019, Space Policy.

[9]  David J. Gondelach,et al.  Element sets for high-order Poincaré mapping of perturbed Keplerian motion , 2018, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy.

[10]  Mauro Massari,et al.  Differential Algebra software library with automatic code generation for space embedded applications , 2018 .

[11]  R. Russell,et al.  A smooth and robust Harris-Priester atmospheric density model for low Earth orbit applications , 2017 .

[12]  Harry W. Jones,et al.  Estimating the Life Cycle Cost of Space Systems , 2015 .

[13]  A. Morselli,et al.  A high order method for orbital conjunctions analysis: Sensitivity to initial uncertainties , 2014 .

[14]  Adam E. White,et al.  The many futures of active debris removal , 2014 .

[15]  Christophe Bonnal,et al.  Active debris removal: Recent progress and current trends , 2013 .

[16]  J. Liou An active debris removal parametric study for LEO environment remediation , 2011 .

[17]  M. K. Mallick,et al.  Comparative studies of atmospheric density models used for earth satellite orbit estimation , 1984 .

[18]  Theodore N. Edelbaum,et al.  Propulsion Requirements for Controllable Satellites , 1961 .

[19]  N. K. Philip,et al.  Trajectory optimization for Rendezvous and Docking using Nonlinear Model Predictive Control , 2020 .

[20]  Eduardo F. Camacho,et al.  Model Predictive Control for Spacecraft Rendezvous in Elliptical Orbits with On/Off Thrusters , 2015 .

[21]  J. Junkins,et al.  How Nonlinear is It? A Tutorial on Nonlinearity of Orbit and Attitude Dynamics , 2003 .