Positive Mathematical Programming with Multiple Data Points: A Cross-Sectional Estimation Procedure

This paper introduces an approach to the specification of non-linear cost functions in regional programming models. It can be characterised as an application of positive mathematical programming (PMP) to multiple observations. The application of PMP in policy relevant agricultural supply models as a mean for calibration has significantly increased during the last ten years. However, many modellers have not reflected the arbitrary and potentially implausible response behaviour of the resulting models implied by standard applications of the approach. Paris and Howitt (1998) interpret PMP as the estimation of a non-linear cost function and generalize the specification by employing a « Maximum Entropy (ME) » procedure. However, their approach still lacks a sufficient empirical base and involves a parameterisation to enforce correct curvature of the cost function, which induces significant problems in applications. The suggested methodology is designed to exploit information contained in a cross sectional sample to specify — regionally specific — quadratic cost functions with cross effects for crop activities. It also provides a solution to the curvature problem. The approach is applied to regional programming models for 22 regions in France. An ex-post simulation across the 1992 CAP-reform shows plausible results with respect to the simulation behaviour of the resulting models. Paths for extensions and improvements of this methodology are identified.

[1]  George Judge,et al.  Coordinate Based Empirical Likelihood-Like Estimation in Ill-Conditioned Inverse Problems , 2002 .

[2]  Q. Paris,et al.  An integrated multi-phase model for evaluating agricultural policies through positive information. , 2001 .

[3]  Amos Golan,et al.  Maximum entropy econometrics , 1996 .

[4]  P. Preckel.  Least Squares and Entropy: A Penalty Function Perspective , 2001 .

[5]  Richard E. Howitt,et al.  An Analysis of Ill‐Posed Production Problems Using Maximum Entropy , 1998 .

[6]  Richard E. Howitt,et al.  A CALIBRATION METHOD FOR AGRICULTURAL ECONOMIC PRODUCTION MODELS , 1995 .

[7]  Douglas J. Miller,et al.  Estimation of Multi-Output Production Functions with Incomplete Data: A Generalized Maximum Entropy Approach , 1998 .

[8]  Richard E. Howitt,et al.  Positive Mathematical Programming , 1995 .

[9]  John Helming,et al.  Assessing the consequences of environmental policy scenarios in Flemish agriculture , 2001 .

[10]  A. Barkaoui,et al.  Positive mathematical programming and cereals and oilseeds supply within EU under Agenda 2000 , 1999 .

[11]  Alexandre Gohin,et al.  La programmation mathématique positive dans les modèles d'exploitation agricole. Principes et importance du calibrage , 1999, Cahiers d'Economie et sociologie rurales.

[12]  George G. Judge,et al.  Econometric foundations , 2000 .

[13]  Richard Howitt,et al.  The Canadian Regional Agriculture Model Structure, Operation and Development , 1992 .

[14]  Bruno Henry de Frahan,et al.  Analysing the effects of Agenda 2000 using a CES Calibrated model of Belgian agriculture , 2001 .

[15]  Douglas J. Miller,et al.  Recovering Output‐Specific Inputs from Aggregate Input Data: A Generalized Cross‐Entropy Approach , 1998 .

[16]  Xiaobo Zhang,et al.  Estimating Crop‐Specific Production Technologies in Chinese Agriculture: A Generalized Maximum Entropy Approach , 2001 .

[17]  Hervé Guyomard,et al.  Estimating crop supply response in the presence of farm programmes: application to the CAP , 1996 .