Comparison of various microalgae liquid biofuel production pathways based on energetic, economic and environmental criteria.

In view of the increasing demand for bioenergy, in this study, the techno-economic viabilities for three emerging pathways to microalgal biofuel production have been evaluated. The three processes evaluated are the hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL), oil secretion and alkane secretion. These three routes differ in their lipid extraction procedure and the end-products produced. This analysis showed that these three processes showed various advantages: possibility to convert the defatted microalgae into bio-crude via HTL thus increasing the total biodiesel yield; better energetic and environmental performance for oil secretion and an even increased net energy ratio (NER) for alkane secretion. However, great technological breakthroughs are needed before planning any scale-up strategy such as continuous wet biomass processing and heat exchange optimization for the HTL pathway and effective and sustainable excretion for both secretion pathways.

[1]  Yutaka Dote,et al.  Recovery of liquid fuel from hydrocarbon-rich microalgae by thermochemical liquefaction , 1994 .

[2]  F Delrue,et al.  An economic, sustainability, and energetic model of biodiesel production from microalgae. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[3]  N. Bernet,et al.  Experimental study on a coupled process of production and anaerobic digestion of Chlorella vulgaris. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[4]  Amanda Lea-Langton,et al.  Nutrient recycling of aqueous phase for microalgae cultivation from the hydrothermal liquefaction process , 2012 .

[5]  B. Sturm,et al.  Geographic analysis of the feasibility of collocating algal biomass production with wastewater treatment plants. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  K. Das,et al.  Effect of operating conditions of thermochemical liquefaction on biocrude production from Spirulina platensis. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[7]  A. Schirmer,et al.  Microbial Biosynthesis of Alkanes , 2010, Science.

[8]  Armando G. McDonald,et al.  Concomitant extraction of bio-oil and value added polysaccharides from Chlorella sorokiniana using a unique sequential hydrothermal extraction technology , 2012 .

[9]  Philip Owende,et al.  Biofuels from microalgae—A review of technologies for production, processing, and extractions of biofuels and co-products , 2010 .

[10]  Olivier Bernard,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of microalgae as a necessary step to make microalgal biodiesel sustainable. , 2009, Biotechnology advances.

[11]  P. Biller,et al.  Catalytic hydrothermal processing of microalgae: decomposition and upgrading of lipids. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[12]  R. Bachofen.  The production of hydrocarbons byBotryococcus braunii , 2005, Experientia.

[13]  Amanda Lea-Langton,et al.  Hydrothermal processing of microalgae using alkali and organic acids , 2010 .

[14]  E. Frank,et al.  Life cycle comparison of hydrothermal liquefaction and lipid extraction pathways to renewable diesel from algae , 2012, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[15]  M. Hoppert,et al.  Mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae deficient in acyl‐CoA synthetases secrete fatty acids due to interrupted fatty acid recycling , 2008, The FEBS journal.

[16]  Donald R. Woods,et al.  Evaluation of capital cost data. part 7: Liquid waste disposal with emphasis on physical treatment , 1993 .

[17]  Masato Baba,et al.  Optimization of light for growth, photosynthesis, and hydrocarbon production by the colonial microalga Botryococcus braunii BOT-22. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[18]  Xinyao Liu,et al.  Fatty acid production in genetically modified cyanobacteria , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices , 2002 .

[20]  Brajendra K Sharma,et al.  Thermochemical conversion of raw and defatted algal biomass via hydrothermal liquefaction and slow pyrolysis. , 2012, Bioresource technology.