New Control Strategies for Multifunctional Prostheses that Combine Electromyographic and Speech Signals

The control of multifunctional myoelectric prostheses is commonly limited due to the lack of sufficient electromyography (EMG) signals after amputation. With a goal of developing easy-to-use and flexibly controlled multifunctional prostheses, the authors propose two control strategies that fuse EMG and speech signals. In the first, speech signals switch the joint-mode, and EMG signals determine a motion class to actuate the target movement. In the second, speech signals select a motion class directly, and EMG signals actuated the movement. Experimental results showed that the proposed strategies could improve control performance and enhance the operational efficiency significantly, suggesting that signal fusion is a feasible way to effectively strengthen interactions between humans and machines.

[1]  T W Williams,et al.  Practical methods for controlling powered upper-extremity prostheses. , 1990, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[2]  Guanglin Li,et al.  Using speech for mode selection in control of multifunctional myoelectric prostheses , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[3]  Levi J. Hargrove,et al.  A Comparison of Surface and Intramuscular Myoelectric Signal Classification , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  Robert D. Lipschutz,et al.  Targeted muscle reinnervation for real-time myoelectric control of multifunction artificial arms. , 2009, JAMA.

[5]  J. Stastny,et al.  EEG signal classification , 2001, 2001 Conference Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  R. Scott,et al.  Myoelectric control of prostheses. , 1986, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[7]  Chih-Lung Lin,et al.  A speech controlled artificial limb based on DSP chip , 1998, Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Vol.20 Biomedical Engineering Towards the Year 2000 and Beyond (Cat. No.98CH36286).

[8]  Dario Farina,et al.  Myoelectric Control of Artificial Limbs¿Is There a Need to Change Focus? [In the Spotlight] , 2012, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[9]  Kevin Towers,et al.  VOICE RECOGNITION FOR PROSTHETIC CONTROL CASE STUDY , 2005 .

[10]  Adrian D. C. Chan,et al.  A Gaussian mixture model based classification scheme for myoelectric control of powered upper limb prostheses , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  M. Swiontkowski Targeted Muscle Reinnervation for Real-time Myoelectric Control of Multifunction Artificial Arms , 2010 .

[12]  Guanglin Li,et al.  Toward attenuating the impact of arm positions on electromyography pattern-recognition based motion classification in transradial amputees , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[13]  K. Englehart,et al.  Classification of the myoelectric signal using time-frequency based representations. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[14]  E. Mainardi,et al.  Controlling a prosthetic arm with a throat microphone , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[15]  Adrian D. C. Chan,et al.  Continuous myoelectric control for powered prostheses using hidden Markov models , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  Andreas Attenberger,et al.  Prostheses Control with Combined Near-Infrared and Myoelectric Signals , 2011, EUROCAST.

[17]  I. Elamvazuthi,et al.  Voice Recognition Algorithms using Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficient (MFCC) and Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) Techniques , 2010, ArXiv.

[18]  T. Kuiken,et al.  Quantifying Pattern Recognition—Based Myoelectric Control of Multifunctional Transradial Prostheses , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.