Time-varying Analysis of Traffic Conflicts at the Upstream Approach of Toll Plaza.

This study investigates the traffic conflict risks at the upstream approach of toll plaza during the vehicles' diverging period from the time of arrival at the diverging area to that of entering the tollbooths. Based on the vehicle's trajectory data extracted from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) videos using an automated video analysis system, vehicles' collision risk is computed by extended time to collision (TTC). Then, two time-varying mixed logit models including time-varying random effects logistic regression (T-RELR) model and time-varying random parameters logistic regression (T-RPLR) are developed to examine the time varying effects of influencing factors on vehicle collision risk, and four models including the standard random effects logistic regression (S-RELR) model, standard random parameters logistic regression (S-RPLR) model, distance-varying random effects logistic regression (D-RELR) model and distance-varying random parameters logistic regression (D-RPLR) are developed for model performance comparison. The results indicate that the T-RPLR model has the highest prediction accuracy. Eight influencing factors including following vehicle's travel distance, following vehicle's initial lane, following vehicle's toll collection type, leading vehicle's toll collection type, distance between two vehicles' centroids, and following vehicle's speed, are found to have time-varying effects on collision risk. Meanwhile, the first six factors are found to exhibit heterogeneous effects over the travel time. Another important finding is that the vehicle that comes from the innermost lane has an increasing trend to be involved in traffic conflicts, whereas the collision risks of other vehicles decrease as the travel time increases. Moreover, vehicles with higher speed have a decreasing probability to be involved in crashes over the travel time. Interestingly, the results of D-RPLR model are similar with that of T-RPLR model. These findings provide helpful information for accurate assessment of collision risk, which is a key step toward improving safety performance of the toll plazas' diverging areas.

[1]  S. M. Sohel Mahmud,et al.  Application of proximal surrogate indicators for safety evaluation: A review of recent developments and research needs , 2017 .

[2]  C. Hydén,et al.  Evaluation of traffic safety, based on micro-level behavioural data: theoretical framework and first implementation. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  Wei Wang,et al.  Development of a variable speed limit strategy to reduce secondary collision risks during inclement weathers. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Examining traffic conflicts of up stream toll plaza area using vehicles' trajectory data. , 2019, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Ye Li,et al.  Comparison of different models for evaluating vehicle collision risks at upstream diverging area of toll plaza. , 2019, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Aggregate nonparametric safety analysis of traffic zones. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Yao Yu,et al.  Time-dependent drivers’ merging behavior model in work zone merging areas , 2017 .

[8]  Wei Wang,et al.  Reducing the risk of rear-end collisions with infrastructure-to-vehicle (I2V) integration of variable speed limit control and adaptive cruise control system , 2016, Traffic injury prevention.

[9]  Qiang Meng,et al.  Evaluation of rear-end crash risk at work zone using work zone traffic data. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Kali Carroll EVALUATION OF REAL WORLD TOLL PLAZAS USING DRIVING SIMULATION , 2016 .

[11]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Safety Evaluation of Hybrid Main-Line Toll Plazas , 2014 .

[12]  Stuart R Perkins,et al.  Traffic conflict characteristics-accident potential at intersections , 1968 .

[13]  Xiang Li,et al.  Interactive risk analysis on crash injury severity at a mountainous freeway with tunnel groups in China. , 2018, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  A cross-comparison of different techniques for modeling macro-level cyclist crashes. , 2018, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Moatz Saad,et al.  Analysis of driving behavior at expressway toll plazas , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[16]  Muamer Abuzwidah,et al.  Evaluation And Modeling Of The Safety Of Open Road Tolling System , 2011 .

[17]  Qi Shi,et al.  Big Data applications in real-time traffic operation and safety monitoring and improvement on urban expressways , 2015 .

[18]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Safety assessment of the conversion of toll plazas to all-electronic toll collection system. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  Ian A Mckinnon,et al.  Operational and Safety-based Analyses of Varied Toll Lane Configurations , 2013 .

[20]  Qiang Meng,et al.  Effects of environment, vehicle and driver characteristics on risky driving behavior at work zones , 2012 .

[21]  John C Hayward,et al.  NEAR-MISS DETERMINATION THROUGH USE OF A SCALE OF DANGER , 1972 .

[22]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Artificial Neural Networks and Logit Models for Traffic Safety Analysis of Toll Plazas , 2002 .

[23]  Wei Wang,et al.  A Genetic Programming Model for Real-Time Crash Prediction on Freeways , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[24]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Development of Artificial Neural Network Models to Predict Driver Injury Severity in Traffic Accidents at Signalized Intersections , 2001 .

[25]  Helai Huang,et al.  Investigating varying effect of road-level factors on crash frequency across regions: A Bayesian hierarchical random parameter modeling approach , 2018, Analytic Methods in Accident Research.

[26]  Ye Li,et al.  Evaluating the safety impact of adaptive cruise control in traffic oscillations on freeways. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[27]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Developing a Crash Warning System for the Bike Lane Area at Intersections with Connected Vehicle Technology , 2019, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[28]  Helai Huang,et al.  Support vector machine in crash prediction at the level of traffic analysis zones: Assessing the spatial proximity effects. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[29]  Griselda López,et al.  Extracting decision rules from police accident reports through decision trees. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[30]  Gang Du,et al.  Time-varying mixed logit model for vehicle merging behavior in work zone merging areas. , 2018, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[31]  Juneyoung Park,et al.  Developing an algorithm to assess the rear-end collision risk under fog conditions using real-time data , 2018 .

[32]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Real-time prediction of visibility related crashes , 2012 .

[33]  Wei Wang,et al.  Using support vector machine models for crash injury severity analysis. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[34]  Hamid Behbahani,et al.  A Framework for Applying Surrogate Safety Measures for Sideswipe Conflicts , 2015 .

[35]  Li-Yen Chang,et al.  Analysis of driver injury severity in truck-involved accidents using a non-parametric classification tree model , 2013 .

[36]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Automated Safety Diagnosis of Vehicle–Bicycle Interactions Using Computer Vision Analysis , 2013 .

[37]  Juneyoung Park,et al.  Crash modeling for intersections and segments along corridors: a Bayesian multilevel joint model with random parameters , 2017 .

[38]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Bayesian Updating Approach for Real-Time Safety Evaluation with Automatic Vehicle Identification Data , 2012 .

[39]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Safety evaluation of unconventional outside left-turn lane using automated traffic conflict techniques , 2016 .

[40]  Wei Wang,et al.  Safety performance of traffic phases and phase transitions in three phase traffic theory. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[41]  Karim Ismail,et al.  Traffic conflict techniques for road safety analysis: open questions and some insights , 2014 .

[42]  Jaeyoung Lee,et al.  Utilizing bluetooth and adaptive signal control data for real-time safety analysis on urban arterials , 2018, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[43]  Stewart Worrall,et al.  Extending Time to Collision for probabilistic reasoning in general traffic scenarios , 2015 .

[44]  Lu Xing,et al.  Integrated Cooperative Adaptive Cruise and Variable Speed Limit Controls for Reducing Rear-End Collision Risks Near Freeway Bottlenecks Based on Micro-Simulations , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[45]  Yafeng Yin,et al.  Deployment of roadside units to overcome connectivity gap in transportation networks with mixed traffic , 2020, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[46]  Qiang Meng,et al.  Analysis of driver casualty risk for different work zone types. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[47]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  Analysis of vehicle accident-injury severities: A comparison of segment- versus accident-based latent class ordered probit models with class-probability functions , 2018, Analytic Methods in Accident Research.