The Two Faces of Issue Voting

Both implicit democratic norms and the reconstructions provided by theorists of rational choice suggest that issue voters are more sophisticated–educated, informed, and active in politics–than other voters. But some issues are clearly more difficult than others, and the voters who respond to “hard” and “easy” issues, respectively, are assumed to differ in kind. We propose the hypothesis that “easy-issue” voters are no more sophisticated than non-issue voters, and this is found to be the case. The findings suggest a reevaluation of the import of rising and falling levels of issue voting and suggest a prominent role for “easy” issues in electoral realignments.

[1]  Choices and Echoes in Presidential Elections: Rational Man and Electoral Democracy , 1980 .

[2]  Carl P. Hensler,et al.  Whites' Opposition to “Busing”: Self-interest or Symbolic Politics? , 1979, American Political Science Review.

[3]  O. Young,et al.  A Test of Downsian Voter Rationality: 1964 Presidential Voting , 1978, American Political Science Review.

[4]  Steven J. Rosenstone,et al.  The Effect of Registration Laws on Voter Turnout , 1978, American Political Science Review.

[5]  G. Pomper.  From Confusion to Confusion , 1977, American Political Science Review.

[6]  Michael Margolis.  From Confusion to Confusion: Issues and the American Voter (1956–1972) , 1977, American Political Science Review.

[7]  Norman H. Nie,et al.  The Changing American Voter. , 1976 .

[8]  Frederick T. Steeper,et al.  Comment on “A Majority Party in Disarray” , 1976, American Political Science Review.

[9]  Arthur H. Miller,et al.  A Majority Party in Disarray: Policy Polarization in the 1972 Election , 1976, American Political Science Review.

[10]  Gerald C. Wright.  Linear Models for Evaluating Conditional Relationships , 1976 .

[11]  E. Carr.  The American Party , 1976 .

[12]  John H. Aldrich,et al.  Probing the Bounds of Conventional Wisdom. A Comparison of Regression, Probit, and Discriminant Analysis* , 1975 .

[13]  Fred I. Greenstein,et al.  Handbook of political science , 1975 .

[14]  R. McKelvey,et al.  A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables , 1975 .

[15]  Richard A. Brody,et al.  Policy Voting and the Electoral Process: The Vietnam War Issue , 1972, American Political Science Review.

[16]  John H. Kessel.  Comment: The Issues in Issue Voting , 1972, American Political Science Review.

[17]  Richard A. Brody,et al.  Comment: The Assessment of Policy Voting , 1972, American Political Science Review.

[18]  G. Pomper.  From Confusion to Clarity: Issues and American Voters, 1956–1968 , 1972, American Political Science Review.

[19]  R. W. Boyd.  Popular Control of Public Policy: A Normal Vote Analysis of the 1968 Election , 1972, American Political Science Review.

[20]  N. Nie,et al.  Review Article: Election Studies of the Survey Research Center , 1971, British Journal of Political Science.

[21]  Richard A. Brody,et al.  PARTICIPATION, POLICY PREFERENCES, AND THE WAR IN VIETNAM , 1970 .

[22]  M. Hinich,et al.  An Expository Development of a Mathematical Model of the Electoral Process , 1970, American Political Science Review.

[23]  F. Greenstein.  The American Party System and the American People , 1970 .

[24]  P. Converse,et al.  Continuity and Change in American Politics: Parties and Issues in the 1968 Election , 1969, American Political Science Review.

[25]  V. O. Key,et al.  The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting, 1936-1960. , 1970 .

[26]  Angus Campbell,et al.  The American voter , 1960 .

[27]  A. Downs.  An Economic Theory of Democracy , 1957 .

[28]  David E. RePass.  Issue Salience and Party Choice , 1929, American Political Science Review.