USING THE SPATIAL AND SPECTRAL PRECISION OF SATELLITE IMAGERY TO PREDICT WILDLIFE OCCURRENCE PATTERNS

We investigated the potential of using unclassified spectral data for predicting the distribution of three bird species over a ¨400,000 ha region of Michigan’s Upper Peninsula using Landsat ETM+ imagery and 433 locations sampled for birds through point count surveys. These species, Black-throated Green Warbler, Nashville Warbler, and Ovenbird, were known to be associated with forest understory features during breeding. We examined the influences of varying two spatially explicit classification parameters on prediction accuracy: 1) the window size used to average spectral values in signature creation and 2) the threshold distance required for bird detections to be counted as present. Two accuracy measurements, proportion correctly classified (PCC) and Kappa, of maps predicting species’ occurrences were calculated with ground data not used during classification. Maps were validated for all three species with Kappa values >0.3 and PCC >0.6. However, PCC provided little information other than a summary of sample plot frequencies used to classify species’ presence and absence. Comparisons with rule-based maps created using the approach of Gap Analysis showed that spectral information predicted the occurrence of these species that use forest subcanopy components better than could be done using known land cover associations (Kappa values 0.1 to 0.3 higher than Gap Analysis maps). Accuracy statistics for each species were affected in different ways by the detection distance of point count surveys used to stratify plots into presence and absence classes. Moderate-to-large detection distances (100 m and 180 m) best classified maps of Blackthroated Green Warbler and Nashville Warbler occurrences, while moderate detection distances (50 m and 100 m), which ignored remote observations, provided the best source of information for classification of Ovenbird occurrence. Window sizes used in signature creation also influenced accuracy statistics but to a lesser extent. Highest Kappa values of majority maps were typically obtained using moderate window sizes of 9 to 13 pixels (0.8 to 1.2 ha), which are representative of the study species territory sizes. The accuracy of wildlife occurrence maps classified from spectral data will therefore differ given the species of interest, the spatial precision of occurrence records used as ground references and the number of pixels included in spectral signatures. For these reasons, a quantitative examination is warranted to determine how subjective decisions made during image classifications affect prediction accuracies.

[1]  Peter T. Wolter,et al.  Improved forest classification in the northern Lake States using multi-temporal Landsat imagery , 1995 .

[2]  Christopher A. Lepczyk,et al.  Assessing Landowner Activities Related to Birds Across Rural-to-Urban Landscapes , 2004, Environmental management.

[3]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[4]  John R. Sauer,et al.  Monitoring Bird Populations by Point Counts , 1997 .

[5]  J. Michael Scott,et al.  Predicting Species Occurrences: Issues of Accuracy and Scale , 2002 .

[6]  T. M. Lillesand,et al.  Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation , 1980 .

[7]  W. Cohen,et al.  Lidar Remote Sensing of the Canopy Structure and Biophysical Properties of Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forests , 1999 .

[8]  Pierre Dutilleul,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity against Heteroscedasticity: An Ecological Paradigm versus a Statistical Concept , 1993 .

[9]  John A. Richards,et al.  Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis: An Introduction , 1999 .

[10]  S. Pearson The spatial extent and relative influence of landscape-level factors on wintering bird populations , 1993, Landscape Ecology.

[11]  John A. Silander,et al.  Delineating forest canopy species in the northeastern united states using multi-temporal TM imagery , 1998 .

[12]  F. Gemmell,et al.  Effects of forest cover, terrain, and scale on timber volume estimation with Thematic Mapper data in a rocky mountain site , 1995 .

[13]  Demonstrating the destruction of the habitat of the Cape Sable seaside sparrow (Ammodramus maritimus mirabilis) , 2003 .

[14]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Habitat Patch Connectivity and Population Survival , 1985 .

[15]  G. H. Rosenfield,et al.  A coefficient of agreement as a measure of thematic classification accuracy. , 1986 .

[16]  A. Cracknell Review article Synergy in remote sensing-what's in a pixel? , 1998 .

[17]  D. Engle,et al.  Vegetation cover type and avian species changes on landscapes within a wildland-urban interface , 1997 .

[18]  F. Thompson,et al.  Postfledging dispersal, habitat use, and home-range size of juvenile wood Thrushes , 1998 .

[19]  E. Zube Perceived land use patterns and landscape values , 1987, Landscape Ecology.

[20]  Jon L. Dunn,et al.  A Field Guide to Warblers of North America , 1997 .

[21]  B. McCune,et al.  Analysis of Ecological Communities , 2002 .

[22]  Philip A. Townsend,et al.  A Quantitative Fuzzy Approach to Assess Mapped Vegetation Classifications for Ecological Applications , 2000 .

[23]  S. Tarantola,et al.  Detecting vegetation leaf water content using reflectance in the optical domain , 2001 .

[24]  D. Albert Regional landscape ecosystems of Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin: a working map and classification. , 1995 .

[25]  N. B. Kotliar,et al.  Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity , 1990 .

[26]  Steven A. Sader,et al.  Using Bayesian statistics, Thematic Mapper satellite imagery, and breeding bird survey data to model bird species probability of occurrence in Maine , 1997 .

[27]  A technique to locate isolated populations using satellite imagery , 2002 .

[28]  J. Liu,et al.  Ecological Degradation in Protected Areas: The Case of Wolong Nature Reserve for Giant Pandas , 2001, Science.

[29]  T. Schoener Sizes of Feeding Territories among Birds , 1968 .

[30]  V. Saab IMPORTANCE OF SPATIAL SCALE TO HABITAT USE BY BREEDING BIRDS IN RIPARIAN FORESTS: A HIERARCHICAL ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[31]  B. Altman,et al.  A habitat-based point-count protocol for terrestrial birds, emphasizing Washington and Oregon. , 2000 .

[32]  R. G. Wright,et al.  GAP ANALYSIS: A GEOGRAPHIC APPROACH TO PROTECTION OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY , 1993 .

[33]  Scott K. Robinson,et al.  Foraging Behavior of Forest Birds: The Relationships Among Search Tactics, Diet, and Habitat Structure , 1982 .

[34]  Philip Lewis,et al.  Investigation of the Utility of Spectral Vegetation Indices for Determining Information on Coniferous Forests , 1998 .

[35]  Bruce T. Milne,et al.  Animal movements and population dynamics in heterogeneous landscapes , 1992, Landscape Ecology.

[36]  Christopher M. U. Neale,et al.  Identifying Sites for Riparian Wetland Restoration: Application of a Model to the Upper Arkansas River Basin , 1997 .

[37]  T. Smith,et al.  Territory size variation in the ovenbird: the role of habitat structure. [Seiurus aurocapillus] , 1987 .

[38]  G. M. Foody The Continuum of Classification Fuzziness in Thematic Mapping , 1999 .

[39]  C. E. Woodcock,et al.  Geostatistical Estimation of Resolution- Dependent Variance in Remotely Sensed Images , 1999 .

[40]  Martin L. Cody,et al.  Habitat selection in birds , 1986 .

[41]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  Ecography 25: 601 -- 615, 2002 , 2022 .

[42]  Marc L. Imhoff,et al.  Remotely sensed indicators of habitat heterogeneity: Use of synthetic aperture radar in mapping vegetation structure and bird habitat , 1997 .

[43]  Michael L. Morrison,et al.  Wildlife-habitat relationships : concepts and applications , 1993 .

[44]  S. Franklin Remote Sensing for Sustainable Forest Management , 2001 .

[45]  V. T. Parker,et al.  Ecological scale : theory and applications , 1999 .

[46]  J. Probst,et al.  Breeding bird communities in regenerating and mature broadleaf forests in the USA Lake States , 1992 .

[47]  J. R. Jensen Remote Sensing of the Environment: An Earth Resource Perspective , 2000 .

[48]  S. Hurlbert Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments , 1984 .

[49]  P. Stouffer,et al.  Use of Amazonian Forest Fragments by Understory Insectivorous Birds , 1995 .

[50]  Jianguo Liu,et al.  Integrating landscape ecology into natural resource management , 2002 .

[51]  R. Colwell Remote sensing of the environment , 1980, Nature.

[52]  D. Lobell,et al.  A Biogeophysical Approach for Automated SWIR Unmixing of Soils and Vegetation , 2000 .

[53]  D. H. Morse VARIABLES AFFECTING THE DENSITY AND TERRITORY SIZE OF BREEDING SPRUCE-WOODS WARBLERS' , 1976 .

[54]  S. Collins Geographic Variation in Habitat Structure of the Black-Throated Green Warbler (Dendroica virens) , 1983 .

[55]  John A. Wiens,et al.  Integrating Landscape Ecology into Natural Resource Management: Integrating landscape structure and scale into natural resource management , 2002 .

[56]  J. Falls,et al.  Foraging and Territoriality of Male Ovenbirds (Aves: Parulidae) in a Heterogeneous Habitat , 1979 .

[57]  K. Pregitzer,et al.  A COMPARISON OF PRESETTLEMENT AND PRESENT-DAY FORESTS IN TWO NORTHERN MICHIGAN DEER YARDS , 1996 .

[58]  S. Emlen The Auk , 1897, Science.

[59]  C. Jenkins,et al.  Why sparrow distributions do not match model predictions , 2003 .

[60]  B. Noon,et al.  Integrating Scientific Methods with Habitat Conservation Planning: Reserve Design for Northern Spotted Owls. , 1992, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[61]  Byron J. T. Morgan,et al.  Estimating Numbers of Terrestrial Birds. , 1981 .

[62]  Nick M. Haddad,et al.  Integrating Landscape Ecology into Natural Resource Management: Incorporating the effects of habitat edges into landscape models: Effective area models for cross-boundary management , 2002 .

[63]  F. Ramsey,et al.  Tests of hearing ability , 1981 .

[64]  Frank R. Thompson,et al.  Landscape And Edge Effects On The Distribution Of Mammalian Predators In Missouri , 2000 .

[65]  G. Polis Age Structure Component of Niche Width and Intraspecific Resource Partitioning: Can Age Groups Function as Ecological Species? , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[66]  E. Gustafson,et al.  Perception of scale in forest management planning: Challenges and implications , 1997 .

[67]  Robert H. Whittaker,et al.  Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains , 1956 .

[68]  Scott L. Collins,et al.  Habitat relationships of wood warblers (Parulidae) in northern central Minnesota , 1982 .

[69]  R. Macarthur,et al.  On Optimal Use of a Patchy Environment , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[70]  Thomas M. Lillesand,et al.  Upper Midwest Gap Analysis Program, Image Processing Protocol , 1998 .

[71]  Mike P. Austin,et al.  Continuum Concept, Ordination Methods, and Niche Theory , 1985 .