The Direction of Stretch-Induced Cell and Stress Fiber Orientation Depends on Collagen Matrix Stress

Cell structure depends on both matrix strain and stiffness, but their interactive effects are poorly understood. We investigated the interactive roles of matrix properties and stretching patterns on cell structure by uniaxially stretching U2OS cells expressing GFP-actin on silicone rubber sheets supporting either a surface-adsorbed coating or thick hydrogel of type-I collagen. Cells and their actin stress fibers oriented perpendicular to the direction of cyclic stretch on collagen-coated sheets, but oriented parallel to the stretch direction on collagen gels. There was significant alignment parallel to the direction of a steady increase in stretch for cells on collagen gels, while cells on collagen-coated sheets did not align in any direction. The extent of alignment was dependent on both strain rate and duration. Stretch-induced alignment on collagen gels was blocked by the myosin light-chain kinase inhibitor ML7, but not by the Rho-kinase inhibitor Y27632. We propose that active orientation of the actin cytoskeleton perpendicular and parallel to direction of stretch on stiff and soft substrates, respectively, are responses that tend to maintain intracellular tension at an optimal level. Further, our results indicate that cells can align along directions of matrix stress without collagen fibril alignment, indicating that matrix stress can directly regulate cell morphology.

[1]  D. Discher,et al.  Optimal matrix rigidity for stress fiber polarization in stem cells. , 2010, Nature physics.

[2]  Shu Chien,et al.  Cooperative effects of Rho and mechanical stretch on stress fiber organization. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Léa Trichet,et al.  Evidence of a large-scale mechanosensing mechanism for cellular adaptation to substrate stiffness , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  K. Kaibuchi,et al.  Stress fiber organization regulated by MLCK and Rho-kinase in cultured human fibroblasts. , 2001, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[5]  Cynthia A Reinhart-King,et al.  Endothelial cell adhesion and migration. , 2008, Methods in enzymology.

[6]  Linhong Deng,et al.  Universal physical responses to stretch in the living cell , 2007, Nature.

[7]  R. Kaunas,et al.  Fluid Shear Stress and Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Activate Calpain to Promote Membrane Type 1 Matrix Metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP) Membrane Translocation and Endothelial Invasion into Three-dimensional Collagen Matrices* , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[8]  Dennis E Discher,et al.  How deeply cells feel: methods for thin gels , 2010, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[9]  Y. C. Fung,et al.  A first course in continuum mechanics : for physical and biological engineers and scientists , 1994 .

[10]  P. Dartsch,et al.  Response of cultured endothelial cells to mechanical stimulation , 1989, Basic Research in Cardiology.

[11]  R. Kaunas,et al.  Cyclic stretch-induced stress fiber dynamics - dependence on strain rate, Rho-kinase and MLCK. , 2010, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[12]  T. Matsuda,et al.  Two-dimensional orientational response of smooth muscle cells to cyclic stretching. , 1992, ASAIO journal.

[13]  Sergey V. Plotnikov,et al.  Force Fluctuations within Focal Adhesions Mediate ECM-Rigidity Sensing to Guide Directed Cell Migration , 2012, Cell.

[14]  Andrew K. Capulli,et al.  Combining Dynamic Stretch and Tunable Stiffness to Probe Cell Mechanobiology In Vitro , 2011, PloS one.

[15]  Mina J Bissell,et al.  Dissecting regional variations in stress fiber mechanics in living cells with laser nanosurgery. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[16]  Ulrich S Schwarz,et al.  Focal adhesions as mechanosensors: the two-spring model. , 2006, Bio Systems.

[17]  D. Stamenović,et al.  Cell prestress. I. Stiffness and prestress are closely associated in adherent contractile cells. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[18]  L. Qin,et al.  Studying Cancer Stem Cell Dynamics on PDMS Surfaces for Microfluidics Device Design , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[19]  J. Fredberg,et al.  Fluidization and Resolidification of the Human Bladder Smooth Muscle Cell in Response to Transient Stretch , 2010, PloS one.

[20]  S. Safran,et al.  Cyclic Stress at mHz Frequencies Aligns Fibroblasts in Direction of Zero Strain , 2011, PloS one.

[21]  H. Greisler,et al.  Dynamic quantitative visualization of single cell alignment and migration and matrix remodeling in 3-D collagen hydrogels under mechanical force. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[22]  Micah Dembo,et al.  Cell-cell mechanical communication through compliant substrates. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[23]  E. Fama,et al.  Migration , 2007 .

[24]  Shamik Sen,et al.  Matrix Strains Induced by Cells: Computing How Far Cells Can Feel , 2009, Cellular and molecular bioengineering.

[25]  Wesley R. Legant,et al.  Physically-Induced Cytoskeleton Remodeling of Cells in Three-Dimensional Culture , 2012, PloS one.

[26]  R. Tranquillo,et al.  Confined compression of a tissue-equivalent: collagen fibril and cell alignment in response to anisotropic strain. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[27]  R. McMeeking,et al.  Cellular contractility and substrate elasticity: a numerical investigation of the actin cytoskeleton and cell adhesion , 2014, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[28]  Susan Q. Vanderzyl,et al.  Stretch-Induced Stress Fiber Remodeling and the Activations of JNK and ERK Depend on Mechanical Strain Rate, but Not FAK , 2010, PloS one.

[29]  H. Hsu Sarcomeric model of stretch-induced stress fiber reorganization , 2010 .

[30]  Marion Ghibaudo,et al.  Rigidity-driven growth and migration of epithelial cells on microstructured anisotropic substrates , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  N. Gavara,et al.  Mapping cell-matrix stresses during stretch reveals inelastic reorganization of the cytoskeleton. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[32]  J. Aubin,et al.  Association between tension and orientation of periodontal ligament fibroblasts and exogenous collagen fibres in collagen gels in vitro. , 1982, Journal of cell science.

[33]  J. Nagatomi,et al.  Effect of Sustained Tension on Bladder Smooth Muscle Cells in Three-Dimensional Culture , 2008, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[34]  Alexandre Kabla,et al.  Strain-Induced Alignment in Collagen Gels , 2009, PloS one.

[35]  R. Kaunas,et al.  Dependence of cyclic stretch-induced stress fiber reorientation on stretch waveform. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[36]  D E Ingber,et al.  Cellular control lies in the balance of forces. , 1998, Current opinion in cell biology.

[37]  R. Kaunas,et al.  A Dynamic Stochastic Model of Frequency-Dependent Stress Fiber Alignment Induced by Cyclic Stretch , 2009, PloS one.

[38]  Anthony G. Evans,et al.  A bio-chemo-mechanical model for cell contractility , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  D. E. Discher,et al.  Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage — Soluble factors that limit osteogenesis , 2009 .

[40]  Jeffrey J. Fredberg,et al.  Reinforcement versus Fluidization in Cytoskeletal Mechanoresponsiveness , 2009, PloS one.

[41]  F. Guilak,et al.  Control of stem cell fate by physical interactions with the extracellular matrix. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[42]  Huajian Gao,et al.  Two characteristic regimes in frequency-dependent dynamic reorientation of fibroblasts on cyclically stretched substrates. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[43]  Feng Xu,et al.  Automated and adaptable quantification of cellular alignment from microscopic images for tissue engineering applications. , 2011, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[44]  P. Janmey,et al.  Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. , 2005, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[45]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.