Observational Teamwork Assessment for Surgery: Feasibility of Clinical and NonClinical Assessor Calibration With Short-Term Training

Objectives:To assess the feasibility of training clinical and nonclinical novice assessors to rate teamwork behavior in the operating room with short-term structured training using the observational teamwork assessment for surgery (OTAS) tool. Background:Effective teamwork is fundamental to the delivery of optimal patient care in the operating room (OR). OTAS provides a comprehensive and robust measure of teamwork in surgery. To date, assessors with a background in psychology/human factors have been shown to be able to use OTAS reliably after training. However, the feasibility of observer training over a short timescale and accessibility to the wider clinical community (ie, OTAS use by clinicians) are yet to be empirically demonstrated. Methods:Ten general surgery cases were observed and assessed using OTAS in real-time by an expert in rating OTAS behaviors (100+ cases rated) and 4 novices: 2 psychologists and 2 surgeons. Assessors were blinded to each other's scores during observations. After each observation, scores were compared and discussed between expert and novice assessors in a debriefing session. Results:All novices were reliable with the expert to a acceptable degree at rating all OTAS behaviors by the end of training (intraclass correlation coefficients ≥0.68). For 3 of the 5 behaviors (communication, cooperation, and leadership), calibration improved most rapidly across the first 7 observed cases. For monitoring/situational awareness, calibration improved steadily across the 10 observed cases. For coordination, no significant improvement in calibration over time was observed because of high interrater reliability from the outset (ie, a ceiling effect). There was no significant difference between surgeons and psychologists in their calibration with the expert. Conclusions:It is feasible to train both clinicians and nonclinicians to use OTAS to assess teamwork behaviors in ORs over a short structured training period. OTAS is an accessible tool that can be used robustly (ie, reliably) by assessors from both clinical and nonclinical backgrounds.

[1]  Nick Sevdalis,et al.  Observational Teamwork Assessment for Surgery (OTAS): Refinement and Application in Urological Surgery , 2007, World Journal of Surgery.

[2]  Charles Vincent Teams Create Safety , 2010 .

[3]  Nick Sevdalis,et al.  Assessment of stress and teamwork in the operating room: an exploratory study. , 2011, American journal of surgery.

[4]  P. McCulloch,et al.  Teamwork and Error in the Operating Room: Analysis of Skills and Roles , 2008, Annals of surgery.

[5]  Ken R Catchpole,et al.  A Multicenter Trial of Aviation-Style Training for Surgical Teams , 2010, Journal of patient safety.

[6]  M. Antonoff,et al.  A novel critical skills curriculum for surgical interns incorporating simulation training improves readiness for acute inpatient care. , 2009, Journal of surgical education.

[7]  G. Hocking,et al.  Anaesthesia non-technical skills: Can anaesthetists be trained to reliably use this behavioural marker system in 1 day? , 2010, British journal of anaesthesia.

[8]  P. McCulloch,et al.  The influence of non-technical performance on technical outcome in laparoscopic cholecystectomy , 2007, Surgical Endoscopy.

[9]  G. Moneta,et al.  Evaluation of distributed practice schedules on retention of a newly acquired surgical skill: a randomized trial. , 2011, American journal of surgery.

[10]  Nick Sevdalis,et al.  The complexity of measuring interprofessional teamwork in the operating theatre , 2006, Journal of interprofessional care.

[11]  Stuart R. Lipsitz,et al.  Patterns of Communication Breakdowns Resulting in Injury to Surgical Patients , 2007 .

[12]  R. Reznick,et al.  Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects , 2004, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[13]  Nick Sevdalis,et al.  Observational Teamwork Assessment for Surgery: Construct Validation With Expert Versus Novice Raters , 2009, Annals of surgery.

[14]  P. McCulloch,et al.  The effects of aviation-style non-technical skills training on technical performance and outcome in the operating theatre , 2009, Quality & Safety in Health Care.

[15]  Ara Darzi,et al.  Observational Assessment of Surgical Teamwork: A Feasibility Study , 2006, World Journal of Surgery.

[16]  Stuart R Lipsitz,et al.  Patterns of communication breakdowns resulting in injury to surgical patients. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[17]  C. Vincent,et al.  Observing and assessing surgical teams: The observational teamwork assessment for surgery© (OTAS)© , 2009 .

[18]  Charles Vincent,et al.  Systems Approaches to Surgical Quality and Safety: From Concept to Measurement , 2004, Annals of surgery.

[19]  S. Guerlain,et al.  A systems approach to surgical safety , 2002, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[20]  Nick Sevdalis,et al.  Mental Practice Enhances Surgical Technical Skills: A Randomized Controlled Study , 2011, Annals of surgery.

[21]  Lorelei Lingard,et al.  Team Communications in the Operating Room: Talk Patterns, Sites of Tension, and Implications for Novices , 2002, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[22]  J. Steers,et al.  The UK proposals for revalidation of physicians: Implications for the recertification of surgeons. , 2010, Archives of surgery.

[23]  Steven M Downing,et al.  Reliability: on the reproducibility of assessment data , 2004, Medical education.

[24]  Robert M Mentzer,et al.  Risk-adjusted morbidity in teaching hospitals correlates with reported levels of communication and collaboration on surgical teams but not with scale measures of teamwork climate, safety climate, or working conditions. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[25]  Nick Sevdalis,et al.  The impact of stress on surgical performance: a systematic review of the literature. , 2010, Surgery.

[26]  D. C. Howell Statistical Methods for Psychology , 1987 .

[27]  Nick Sevdalis,et al.  Observational teamwork assessment for surgery: content validation and tool refinement. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[28]  Julia Neily,et al.  Teamwork and communication in surgical teams: implications for patient safety. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[29]  Rhona Flin,et al.  Experience matters: comparing novice and expert ratings of non‐technical skills using the NOTSS system , 2009, ANZ journal of surgery.

[30]  G. Hanna,et al.  The Effects of Stress and Coping on Surgical Performance During Simulations , 2010, Annals of surgery.

[31]  A Darzi,et al.  Selection of individuals for training in surgery. , 2005, American journal of surgery.