Evaluation of a pilot of legally assisted and supported family dispute resolution in family violence cases

Evidence of the prevalence of a history of past and/or current family violence among separated parents, and the presence of ongoing safety concerns for themselves and their children as a result of ongoing contact with the other parent, has created an impetus for the family law system to find more effective ways of dealing with families affected by family violence. In July 2009, the Federal Government announced funding for a pilot program to provide assistance, including family dispute resolution (FDR), to such families. Subsequently, Women’s Legal Service Brisbane (and other consultants) were funded by the Attorney- General’s Department (AGD) to develop a model for coordinated family dispute resolution (CFDR). CFDR is a service for separated families who need assistance to resolve parenting disputes where there has been a history of past and/or current family violence. It is being implemented in five sites/lead agencies across Australia: Perth (Legal Aid Western Australia), Brisbane (Telephone Dispute Resolution Service [TDRS], run by Relationships Australia Queensland), Newcastle (Interrelate), Western Sydney (Unifam) and Hobart (Relationships Australia Tasmania). TDRS made adaptions to the model to accommodate its telephone-based service. The pilot commenced operation at most sites in the final quarter of 2010. Implementation in one location (Brisbane) was delayed until mid-2011 to allow time to finalise the composition of the partnership. This report presents the findings of an evaluation of this process.

[1]  M. McDonald,et al.  Part A: What is it, what does it look like, when is it needed and what supports it? , 2011 .

[2]  R. Field,et al.  The Family Dispute Resolution of Parenting Matters in Australia: An Analysis of the Notion of an 'Independent' Practitioner , 2008 .

[3]  M. Gray,et al.  The Australian Institute of Family Studies Evaluation of the 2006 Family Law Reforms: Key findings , 2010 .

[4]  A. Sanson,et al.  Enhancing inter-professional relationships in a changing family law system , 2008 .

[5]  M. Hester The Three Planet Model: Towards an Understanding of Contradictions in Approaches to Women and Children's Safety in Contexts of Domestic Violence , 2011 .

[6]  Jennifer Hannan Child protection in family law services: How much do we choose to know? , 2012 .

[7]  L. Moloney,et al.  Family violence: Towards a holistic approach to screening and risk assessment in family support services , 2010 .

[8]  P. Woodbridge,et al.  Time for Action : the National Council's plan for Australia to reduce violence against women and their children, 2009-2021 , 2009 .

[9]  M. Gray,et al.  Evaluation of the 2006 family law reforms , 2010 .

[10]  Lawrie Moloney,et al.  Child-Responsive Practices in Australian Family Law: Past Problems and Future Directions⋆ , 2004 .

[11]  B. Rodgers Some comments relating to Family Violence: Towards a Holistic Approach to Screening and Risk Assessment in Family Support Services by Elly Robinson and Lawrie Moloney , 2011 .

[12]  A. Chapman,et al.  Risk Assessment With Victims of Intimate Partner Violence , 2011, Violence against women.

[13]  K. James,et al.  'Using it' or 'losing it': Men's constructions of their violence towards female partners , 2002 .

[14]  Jennifer Hannan,et al.  Innovations in practice: A safety assessment approach to child-inclusive family dispute resolution , 2011 .

[15]  Hilary Astor,et al.  Dispute resolution in Australia , 1992 .

[16]  Neil Blacklock Domestic violence: working with perpetrators, the community and its institutions , 2001 .