Integrated Education of Data Analytics and Information Security through Cross-Curricular Activities

The National Research Council’s report states that cross-sectional studies of multiple courses within a discipline, or all courses in a major, would enhance the understanding of how people learn the concepts, practices, and ways of thinking of science and engineering and the nature and development of expertise in a discipline. In science and engineering, everevolving technology and information make integrative abilities necessary and especially valuable. In this study, we investigated cross-curricular pedagogy, by engaging undergraduate students of two disciplines in collaboration on a common, contextconnected project, so that students are better prepared for solving interdisciplinary problems in career settings. We implemented cross-curricular pedagogy in a network security course and a big data analytics course. The era of big data enables datadriven malicious detection, and big data analytics techniques have been applied to analyzing network logs to reinforce information security and predict abnormal behaviors, so these domains overlap. We investigated two forms of cross-curricular activities: one was integrated instructional units, and the other was crosscurricular knowledge integration projects. The results show significant improvements in students confidence in solving crossdisciplinary problems and a much better understanding of data analytics and information security, as well as the connections between them. This project is the first to study the loose integration of two context-connected courses that are taught in parallel.

[1]  Joseph J. Schwab Problems, Topics, and Issues , 1967 .

[2]  Michelle K. Smith,et al.  Why Peer Discussion Improves Student Performance on In-Class Concept Questions , 2009, Science.

[3]  Greg Pearson,et al.  Understanding Integrated STEM Education: Report on a National Study , 2013 .

[4]  J. Callahan,et al.  Creating a STEM Identity: Investment with Return , 2014 .

[5]  Tamara J. Moore,et al.  Advancing the State of the Art of STEM Integration , 2014 .

[6]  Howard Kimmel,et al.  Advancing the "E" in K-12 STEM Education , 2010 .

[7]  Mary Margaret Capraro,et al.  The Development of a Teacher Observation Instrument for PBL Classroom Instruction , 2012 .

[8]  L. Nadelson,et al.  Course-Integrated Undergraduate Research Experiences Structured at Different Levels of Inquiry , 2010 .

[9]  Susan R. Singer,et al.  Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. , 2012 .

[10]  Astrid Beckmann A Conceptual Framework for Cross-Curricular Teaching , 2009, The Mathematics Enthusiast.

[11]  Ross K. Galloway,et al.  The inverted classroom in a large enrolment introductory physics course: a case study , 2012 .

[12]  Mary Kalantzis,et al.  New Learning: Elements of a Science of Education , 2008 .

[13]  C.O. Malave,et al.  An integrated freshman engineering curriculum for pre-calculus students , 1998, FIE '98. 28th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Moving from 'Teacher-Centered' to 'Learner-Centered' Education. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.98CH36214).

[14]  Chris Rasmussen,et al.  A Method for Using Adjacency Matrices to Analyze the Connections Students Make within and between Concepts: The Case of Linear Algebra. , 2014 .

[15]  L. Fink,et al.  Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses , 2003 .

[16]  P. L. Zenor,et al.  An interdisciplinary approach to the pre-engineering curriculum , 1995, Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1995 25th Annual Conference. Engineering Education for the 21st Century.

[17]  Jay B. Labov,et al.  Integrated Biology and Undergraduate Science Education: A New Biology Education for the Twenty-First Century? , 2010, CBE life sciences education.