Cluster Origin of the Triple Star HD 188753 and Its Planet

The recent discovery by M. Konacki of a "hot Jupiter" in the hierarchical triple star system HD 188753 challenges established theories of giant planet formation. If the orbital geometry of the triple has not changed since the birth of the planet, then a disk around the planetary host star would probably have been too compact and too hot for a Jovian planet to form by the core accretion model or gravitational collapse. This paradox is resolved if the star was initially either single or had a much more distant companion. It is suggested here that a close multistar dynamical encounter transformed this initial state into the observed triple, an idea that follows naturally if HD 188753 formed in a moderately dense stellar system—perhaps an open cluster—that has since dissolved. Three distinct types of encounters are investigated. The most robust scenario involves an initially single planetary host star that changes places with the outlying member of a preexisting hierarchical triple.

[1]  Simon Portegies Zwart,et al.  Planets in triple star systems : The case of HD 188753 , 2005 .

[2]  S. Aarseth,et al.  Tidal interactions in star cluster simulations , 2001 .

[3]  R. Webbink,et al.  in Dynamics of Star Clusters , 1985 .

[4]  P. Bodenheimer,et al.  Orbital migration of the planetary companion of 51 Pegasi to its present location , 1996, Nature.

[5]  F. Adams,et al.  The Modification of Planetary Orbits in Dense Open Clusters , 1998 .

[6]  P. Bodenheimer,et al.  Implications of Extrasolar Planets for Understanding Planet Formation , 2002 .

[7]  S. Tremaine,et al.  A Class of Symplectic Integrators with Adaptive Time Step for Separable Hamiltonian Systems , 1999, astro-ph/9906322.

[8]  Maciej Konacki,et al.  An extrasolar giant planet in a close triple-star system , 2005, Nature.

[9]  S. Mikkola,et al.  Algorithmic regularization of the few‐body problem , 1999 .

[10]  Gordon A. H. Walker,et al.  A Planetary Companion to γ Cephei A , 2003 .

[11]  John N. Bahcall,et al.  Binary-single star scattering. I: Numerical experiments for equal masses , 1983 .

[12]  S. Lubow,et al.  Dynamics of binary-disk interaction. 1: Resonances and disk gap sizes , 1994 .

[13]  E. D. Friel,et al.  The Old Open Clusters of the Milky Way , 1995 .

[14]  F. Adams,et al.  Modes of Multiple Star Formation , 2001, astro-ph/0102039.

[15]  D. F. Merriam,et al.  Annual review of earth and planetary sciences v. 7, Editor: F. A. Donath; Associate Editors: F. G. Stehli, and G. W. Wetherill, Annual Reviews, Inc., 4139 El Camino Way, Palo Alto, California, 94036, 1979, 517p., 17 (U.S.), 17.50 elsewhere , 1980 .

[16]  J. Goodman A Local Instability of Tidally Distorted Accretion Disks , 1993 .

[17]  Melvyn B. Davies,et al.  Planetary dynamics in stellar clusters , 2001 .

[18]  Elazar Uchupi,et al.  Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences: Volume 19 (1991), 484p. US $60.00 and Volume 20 (1992), 631 p. US $64.00 , 1993 .

[19]  M. Mugrauer,et al.  Accepted Received , 2005 .

[20]  Michel Mayor,et al.  Multi-order TODCOR: Application to observations taken with the CORALIE echelle spectrograph - II. A planet in the system HD 41004 , 2004 .

[21]  M. Shara,et al.  Free-floating Planets in Stellar Clusters: Not So Surprising , 2002 .

[22]  E. Bica,et al.  Proper motion measurements as indicators of binarity in open clusters , 2005, astro-ph/0502451.

[23]  Circumstellar and circumbinary discs in eccentric stellar binaries , 2005, astro-ph/0501244.