Evidence for stronger visuo-motor than visuo-proprioceptive conflict during mirror drawing performed by a deafferented subject and control subjects

It has been proposed that mirror drawing is difficult because of the conflict between visual and proprioceptive signals from the arm. However, even without proprioception, there should be difficulties in planning movements to visual targets observed in a mirror, as the mirror-reversed spatial information must be translated into appropriate hand actions. Mirror drawing tasks suggest these planning conflicts are likely to be most obvious at corners, when encountering sharp changes in direction. We have therefore tested the speed of mirror drawing in a chronically deafferented man and in a control group of normal subjects, and hypothesized that increases in template complexity (number of corners) would result in reduced drawing speeds in all subjects. Indeed, all subjects, including the deafferented man, showed movement durations that increased linearly as the complexity of the drawings increased. However, the deafferented man was significantly faster than the control subjects at tracing curved templates. We suggest that the major difficulty in mirror tracking is in the visuo-motor planning of actions based on mirror-reversed visual information, and is not a conflict between visual and proprioceptive signals about arm motion.

[1]  R. Miall,et al.  The role of proprioception and attention in a visuomotor adaptation task , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  The role of proprioception in action recognition , 2003, Consciousness and Cognition.

[3]  Gordon M. Redding,et al.  Applications of prism adaptation: a tutorial in theory and method , 2005, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[4]  Jonathan Cole,et al.  Living without touch and peripheral information about body position and movement: Studies with deafferented subjects. , 1995 .

[5]  H. Patterson,et al.  The Production of Neon and Helium by the Electrical Discharge , 1914 .

[6]  J. J. Denier van der Gon,et al.  Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information , 1999 .

[7]  Jean-Louis Vercher,et al.  The relative contribution of retinal and extraretinal signals in determining the accuracy of reaching movements in normal subjects and a deafferented patient , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  Daniela Balslev,et al.  Enhanced Accuracy in Novel Mirror Drawing after Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Induced Proprioceptive Deafferentation , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  E. Sedgwick,et al.  The perceptions of force and of movement in a man without large myelinated sensory afferents below the neck. , 1992, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  Daniel M Wolpert,et al.  Bayesian integration in force estimation. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  N. V. Scheidemann.  A five-pointed starpattern for mirror-drawing. , 1950, The American journal of psychology.

[12]  R. Treede,et al.  Evoked potentials in a subject with a large-fibre sensory neuropathy below the neck. , 1995, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[13]  J. Cole,et al.  Evoked potentials in a man with a complete large myelinated fibre sensory neuropathy below the neck. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  J. Cole.  Rehabilitation after Sensory Neuronopathy Syndrome , 1998, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[15]  R. Miall,et al.  Intermittency in human manual tracking tasks. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[16]  Tsao Jc.  Mixed distribution of practice in mirror drawing. , 1950 .

[17]  R. Daroff,et al.  Clinical Neurology for Psychiatrists , 1995, Neurology.

[18]  D. Wolpert,et al.  When Feeling Is More Important Than Seeing in Sensorimotor Adaptation , 2002, Current Biology.

[19]  Lack of conscious knowledge about one's own actions in a haptically deafferented patient , 2002 .

[20]  N Teasdale,et al.  Mirror drawing in a deafferented patient and normal subjects , 1992, Neurology.