The Impact of Health Technology Assessment on Decision-Making Processes in Public Versus Not-for-Profit Private Hospitals

Problem statement: The goal of this study is to extend research on Ev idence-Based Practice (EBP) implementation by examining the decision-making processes for acquiring new health technologies in selected hospitals in Southeast Que ensland, Australia. Both a decision-making model and a mini-Health Technology Assessment (HTA) model guide the approach and analysis in this study. We anticipated that both public and private sector organisations would use HTA as the guideline in decision-making processes to acquire new health technologies. Approach: The data were collected using two methods; document analysis and in-depth, face-to-face interviews. The steps in decision- making processes to acquire new health technologies were identified through content and thematic analysis. The HTA process and mini-HTA checklist were used as a bench mark for decision-making processes. Results: Decision making processes were described as informal in not-for-profit private hospitals and as formal in public hospitals. Decisi ons in not-for-profit private hospitals were driven by business strategy and the cost effectiveness of the technologies. In the public hospital, however, the main factors were safety and clinical effectiveness although budget also has some impact. Decision makers in both types of hospitals were unclear abou t HTA and its agencies. They also were not aware of mini-HTA, even though they were searching for a suitable support tool for decision making. Conclusion : This study identified the impact of HTA and mini-HT A in public and private hospital settings. Findings from this study show that the ev idence from HTA is not fully utilised by decision makers in the hospitals to make informed decisions. Health authorities should play a more active role in educating decision makers at hospital level rega rding health technology assessment. Mini-HTA can be a beneficial tool for decision making processes at hospital level.

[1]  L. Ehlers,et al.  Assessment of the quality of mini-HTA , 2009, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[2]  Gisselle Gallego,et al.  Decision makers' perceptions of health technology decision making and priority setting at the institutional level. , 2008, Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association.

[3]  R. Norman,et al.  A model for best practice HTA , 2008 .

[4]  Becky Skidmore,et al.  Priority setting for health technology assessments: A systematic review of current practical approaches , 2007, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[5]  Finn Børlum Kristensen,et al.  Doing mini–health technology assessments in hospitals: A new concept of decision support in health care? , 2006, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[6]  Maurice McGregor,et al.  What decision-makers want and what they have been getting. , 2006, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[7]  M. Gagnon,et al.  Integration of health technology assessment recommendations into organizational and clinical practice: A case study in Catalonia , 2006, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[8]  S. Leggat,et al.  Tools for priority setting: lessons from South Australia. , 2006, Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association.

[9]  P. Lehoux,et al.  Dissemination of health technology assessments: identifying the visions guiding an evolving policy innovation in Canada. , 2005, Journal of health politics, policy and law.

[10]  J. Denis,et al.  Use of health technology assessment in decision making: Coresponsibility of users and producers? , 2005, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[11]  A. Haines,et al.  Bridging the implementation gap between knowledge and action for health. , 2004, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[12]  Ole Frithjof Norheim,et al.  Criteria for priority-setting in health care in Uganda: exploration of stakeholders' values. , 2004, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[13]  P. Mullen,et al.  Quantifying priorities in healthcare: transparency or illusion? , 2004, Health services management research.

[14]  A. Stevens,et al.  Health technology assessment: history and demand. , 2003, Journal of public health medicine.

[15]  Jill M. Sanders.  CHALLENGES, CHOICES, AND CANADA , 2002, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[16]  W. Oortwijn,et al.  Health technology assessment and health care in the European Union. , 2001, International journal of technology assessment in health care.

[17]  M. Drummond,et al.  How can the impact of health technology assessments be enhanced , 2008 .

[18]  G. Gallego.  Access to High Cost Medicines in Australian Hospitals , 2006 .

[19]  B. Perrott,et al.  Marketing dynamics in the Australian private hospital industry , 2005 .